Exploring printing methods for continuous natural fiber-reinforced thermoplastic biocomposites: A comparative study

IF 9.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Sustainable Materials and Technologies Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.susmat.2025.e01253
Natália V. dos Santos , Alberto Giubilini , Daniel Carlos T. Cardoso , Paolo Minetola
{"title":"Exploring printing methods for continuous natural fiber-reinforced thermoplastic biocomposites: A comparative study","authors":"Natália V. dos Santos ,&nbsp;Alberto Giubilini ,&nbsp;Daniel Carlos T. Cardoso ,&nbsp;Paolo Minetola","doi":"10.1016/j.susmat.2025.e01253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites (CFRTPCs) are revolutionizing various industry sectors by enabling a combination of design, optimization, and high performance. The use of continuous natural fiber reinforcement integrates these factors with the potential for developing a sustainable product with a lower ecological footprint compared to tradition composites. However, challenges such as optimizing fiber-matrix impregnation and the identification of the most suitable manufacturing process for structural components remain significant. The objective of this study is to address these challenges by comparing the two main continuous printing methodologies - <em>in-situ</em> impregnation and semi-finished filament fabrication -in their application to natural fiber-reinforced composites. To achieve this, a method for manufacturing semi-finished filaments was developed and compared with the in-nozzle impregnation process by modifying a commercially available 3D printer. Image analysis, surface roughness measurements, deposition rates, and mechanical tests revealed that the semi-finished filament method resulted in better fiber-matrix impregnation, significantly improving tensile strength and elastic modulus by up to 18.4 % compared to the in-nozzle method. Additionally, the semi-finished filament process demonstrated a higher deposition rate, reaching 400 mm/s, compared to 300 mm/s for the in-nozzle process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22097,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Materials and Technologies","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article e01253"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Materials and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214993725000211","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites (CFRTPCs) are revolutionizing various industry sectors by enabling a combination of design, optimization, and high performance. The use of continuous natural fiber reinforcement integrates these factors with the potential for developing a sustainable product with a lower ecological footprint compared to tradition composites. However, challenges such as optimizing fiber-matrix impregnation and the identification of the most suitable manufacturing process for structural components remain significant. The objective of this study is to address these challenges by comparing the two main continuous printing methodologies - in-situ impregnation and semi-finished filament fabrication -in their application to natural fiber-reinforced composites. To achieve this, a method for manufacturing semi-finished filaments was developed and compared with the in-nozzle impregnation process by modifying a commercially available 3D printer. Image analysis, surface roughness measurements, deposition rates, and mechanical tests revealed that the semi-finished filament method resulted in better fiber-matrix impregnation, significantly improving tensile strength and elastic modulus by up to 18.4 % compared to the in-nozzle method. Additionally, the semi-finished filament process demonstrated a higher deposition rate, reaching 400 mm/s, compared to 300 mm/s for the in-nozzle process.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索连续天然纤维增强热塑性生物复合材料的打印方法:比较研究
连续纤维增强热塑性复合材料(cfrtpc)通过实现设计、优化和高性能的结合,正在革新各个行业。与传统复合材料相比,连续天然纤维增强的使用将这些因素与开发具有更低生态足迹的可持续产品的潜力相结合。然而,诸如优化纤维基质浸渍和确定最适合结构部件的制造工艺等挑战仍然很重要。本研究的目的是通过比较两种主要的连续打印方法——原位浸渍和半成品长丝制造——在天然纤维增强复合材料中的应用来解决这些挑战。为了实现这一目标,开发了一种制造半成品长丝的方法,并通过修改市售3D打印机与喷嘴内浸渍工艺进行了比较。图像分析、表面粗糙度测量、沉积速率和力学测试表明,与喷嘴内方法相比,半成品长丝方法具有更好的纤维基质浸渍效果,显著提高了拉伸强度和弹性模量,最高可达18.4%。此外,半成品长丝工艺的沉积速率更高,达到400 mm/s,而喷嘴内工艺的沉积速率为300 mm/s。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Materials and Technologies
Sustainable Materials and Technologies Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
158
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Materials and Technologies (SM&T), an international, cross-disciplinary, fully open access journal published by Elsevier, focuses on original full-length research articles and reviews. It covers applied or fundamental science of nano-, micro-, meso-, and macro-scale aspects of materials and technologies for sustainable development. SM&T gives special attention to contributions that bridge the knowledge gap between materials and system designs.
期刊最新文献
Dehybridisation of fibre-metal laminates via blowing agents in the thermosetting adhesive layer Sabatier-guided atomic-density engineering of Fe single-atom catalysts for high-performance oxygen reduction reaction Life-cycle assessment of wind turbine blade recycling strategies: Co-processing vs. incineration and landfilling A high-performance cobalt-free cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells via multi-element doping in Sr2Fe2O6 Temperature-regulated freezing pretreatment for enhancing the organic dye adsorption performance of chitosan-based materials prepared by vacuum freeze drying
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1