Evaluation of transport carbon efficiency, reduction potential, and influencing factors in Africa

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.11.021
Rockson Sai , Hongping Yuan , Ebenezer Kwabena Takyi , Hermas Abudu , Stephen Agyeman
{"title":"Evaluation of transport carbon efficiency, reduction potential, and influencing factors in Africa","authors":"Rockson Sai ,&nbsp;Hongping Yuan ,&nbsp;Ebenezer Kwabena Takyi ,&nbsp;Hermas Abudu ,&nbsp;Stephen Agyeman","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.11.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Africa aims to promote low emission development pathways. As the second-highest CO<sub>2</sub> emitting sector and contributing to an annual average pollution cost of 6.14% of GDP, the transport sector poses a major barrier to sustainable growth. Enhancing transport carbon emission efficiency is essential for achieving both sustainable growth and emission reduction; however, empirical insights regarding Africa remain limited. Therefore, this study employs non-parametric metafrontier technique to asses transport carbon efficiency, reduction potentials, and sources of emission reduction potentials across forty African countries from 2000 to 2020. Panel regression is employed to identify external factors influencing regional carbon efficiency. The findings reveal that transport carbon efficiency (TCE) in Africa averages 0.372<strong>,</strong> indicating low performance. Central Africa leads the continent's optimal green production technology based on the technology gap ratio, closely followed by Southern Africa. Moreover, the potential for CO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction is estimated at 74.479 % of total TCE, averaging 5583.649 kt annually. Over two-thirds of the emission reduction potential is attributed to addressing management inefficiencies. External influencing factors on TCE exhibit regional heterogeneity. Transport value-added per capita improves TCE in all regions, while energy intensity and renewable energy diminishes it. Sulphur content in diesel, urbanization, institutional quality, business relations, structural change, and FDI have mixed effects. The findings underscore the need for targeted policies to boost carbon efficiency and align transport planning with regional priorities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Pages 65-83"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X24003585","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Africa aims to promote low emission development pathways. As the second-highest CO2 emitting sector and contributing to an annual average pollution cost of 6.14% of GDP, the transport sector poses a major barrier to sustainable growth. Enhancing transport carbon emission efficiency is essential for achieving both sustainable growth and emission reduction; however, empirical insights regarding Africa remain limited. Therefore, this study employs non-parametric metafrontier technique to asses transport carbon efficiency, reduction potentials, and sources of emission reduction potentials across forty African countries from 2000 to 2020. Panel regression is employed to identify external factors influencing regional carbon efficiency. The findings reveal that transport carbon efficiency (TCE) in Africa averages 0.372, indicating low performance. Central Africa leads the continent's optimal green production technology based on the technology gap ratio, closely followed by Southern Africa. Moreover, the potential for CO2 emission reduction is estimated at 74.479 % of total TCE, averaging 5583.649 kt annually. Over two-thirds of the emission reduction potential is attributed to addressing management inefficiencies. External influencing factors on TCE exhibit regional heterogeneity. Transport value-added per capita improves TCE in all regions, while energy intensity and renewable energy diminishes it. Sulphur content in diesel, urbanization, institutional quality, business relations, structural change, and FDI have mixed effects. The findings underscore the need for targeted policies to boost carbon efficiency and align transport planning with regional priorities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲运输碳效率、减排潜力和影响因素的评估
非洲旨在推动低排放发展道路。作为二氧化碳排放量第二高的行业,交通运输行业的年平均污染成本占GDP的6.14%,是可持续增长的主要障碍。提高交通运输碳排放效率对实现可持续增长和减排至关重要;然而,关于非洲的经验见解仍然有限。因此,本研究采用非参数元前沿技术对2000 - 2020年40个非洲国家的运输碳效率、减排潜力和减排潜力来源进行了评估。采用面板回归方法识别影响区域碳效率的外部因素。研究结果表明,非洲交通运输碳效率(TCE)平均为0.372,表现不佳。根据技术差距比,中非在非洲大陆最优绿色生产技术方面处于领先地位,南部非洲紧随其后。此外,二氧化碳减排潜力估计为总总碳排放的74.479%,平均每年5583.649万吨。超过三分之二的减排潜力归因于解决管理效率低下的问题。外部影响因素表现出区域异质性。人均运输增加值提高了所有区域的TCE,而能源强度和可再生能源则降低了TCE。柴油含硫量、城市化、制度质量、商业关系、结构变化和外国直接投资的影响是混合的。研究结果强调,需要制定有针对性的政策来提高碳效率,并使交通规划与区域优先事项保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
Delivering accessible school transportation services in Canada's Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area: A study of education professionals' perspectives Differences in future car-purchase intentions between undergraduates from car-owning households and non-car households Rethinking corporate mobility management: Enhancing employee loyalty through corporate mobility and transportation offerings Port group integration and regional high-quality economic development: Mechanisms and spatial effects Rethinking cost–benefit analysis for transformative cycling policies: Integrating behavioral change and the logsum method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1