Policy implications of the transit metropolis project: A quasi-natural experiment from China

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.12.005
Chunqin Zhang , Yi Huang , Ao Ji , Han Liu , Jinpei Li , Anning Ni , Weite Lu
{"title":"Policy implications of the transit metropolis project: A quasi-natural experiment from China","authors":"Chunqin Zhang ,&nbsp;Yi Huang ,&nbsp;Ao Ji ,&nbsp;Han Liu ,&nbsp;Jinpei Li ,&nbsp;Anning Ni ,&nbsp;Weite Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Chinese government has initiated the Transit Metropolis project, aimed at developing a transit-oriented urban transportation system that progressively enhances the utilization of public transit and encourages private car users to shift towards public transit. Using panel data from 221 cities from 2009 to 2018, we employed a multi-period propensity score matching-differences in differences approach to examine the effects of this project on public transit usage and private car ownership. We utilized the status of a city as a coastal city as an instrumental variable for the Transit Metropolis project to conduct an endogeneity test, ultimately finding no evidence of endogeneity. Even when accounting for competitive policies such as the low-carbon city policy, the results remained consistent, confirming the robustness. The findings suggest that the project has effectively increased public transit use without significantly decreasing private car ownership. However, these impacts vary geographically. Specifically, in Eastern region of China, the project significantly enhanced public transit usage, whereas no comparable significant effect was observed in the Central &amp; Western regions. Regarding private car ownership, the project did not have significant effects in either the Eastern, or the Central &amp; Western regions. These insights provide a reference for further implementing Public Transit Priority policies, help enhance the competitiveness of public transit, and promote the development of transit-oriented urban transportation structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Pages 155-170"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X24003792","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Chinese government has initiated the Transit Metropolis project, aimed at developing a transit-oriented urban transportation system that progressively enhances the utilization of public transit and encourages private car users to shift towards public transit. Using panel data from 221 cities from 2009 to 2018, we employed a multi-period propensity score matching-differences in differences approach to examine the effects of this project on public transit usage and private car ownership. We utilized the status of a city as a coastal city as an instrumental variable for the Transit Metropolis project to conduct an endogeneity test, ultimately finding no evidence of endogeneity. Even when accounting for competitive policies such as the low-carbon city policy, the results remained consistent, confirming the robustness. The findings suggest that the project has effectively increased public transit use without significantly decreasing private car ownership. However, these impacts vary geographically. Specifically, in Eastern region of China, the project significantly enhanced public transit usage, whereas no comparable significant effect was observed in the Central & Western regions. Regarding private car ownership, the project did not have significant effects in either the Eastern, or the Central & Western regions. These insights provide a reference for further implementing Public Transit Priority policies, help enhance the competitiveness of public transit, and promote the development of transit-oriented urban transportation structures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Who Gets What? A user perspective on initial credit allocation in Tradable Mobility Credit Schemes Optimal deposit-return strategies for the recycling of spent electric automobile battery: Manufacturer, retailer, or consumer The influence mechanisms of transport infrastructure on China’s domestic trade: Evidence from trade weight data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1