Immigration from a terror-prone nation: Destination nation's optimal immigration and counterterrorism policies

IF 4.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Modelling Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106972
Subhayu Bandyopadhyay , Khusrav Gaibulloev , Todd Sandler
{"title":"Immigration from a terror-prone nation: Destination nation's optimal immigration and counterterrorism policies","authors":"Subhayu Bandyopadhyay ,&nbsp;Khusrav Gaibulloev ,&nbsp;Todd Sandler","doi":"10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The article presents a two-country model in which a destination country chooses its immigration quota and proactive counterterrorism measures in response to immigration from a terror-plagued country. A novel feature is to tie the optimizing quota and proactive choice to the consequences on the labor market. After the destination country fixes its two policies, immigrants decide between supplying labor or conducting terrorist attacks, which helps to determine equilibrium labor supply and wages. The analysis accounts for the marginal disutility of lost rights/freedoms stemming from stricter counterterror measures as well as the inherent radicalization of migrants. Comparative statics involve changes to those two parameters. For example, an enhanced importance attached to lost rights is shown to limit immigration quotas and counterterrorism actions. In contrast, increased source-country radicalization reduces immigration quotas but has an ambiguous effect on optimal proactive measures. Extensions involve defensive policies and destination-country citizens’ radicalization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48419,"journal":{"name":"Economic Modelling","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 106972"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999324003298","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents a two-country model in which a destination country chooses its immigration quota and proactive counterterrorism measures in response to immigration from a terror-plagued country. A novel feature is to tie the optimizing quota and proactive choice to the consequences on the labor market. After the destination country fixes its two policies, immigrants decide between supplying labor or conducting terrorist attacks, which helps to determine equilibrium labor supply and wages. The analysis accounts for the marginal disutility of lost rights/freedoms stemming from stricter counterterror measures as well as the inherent radicalization of migrants. Comparative statics involve changes to those two parameters. For example, an enhanced importance attached to lost rights is shown to limit immigration quotas and counterterrorism actions. In contrast, increased source-country radicalization reduces immigration quotas but has an ambiguous effect on optimal proactive measures. Extensions involve defensive policies and destination-country citizens’ radicalization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自恐怖主义易发国家的移民:目的国的最佳移民与反恐政策
本文提出了一个两国模型,在该模型中,目的国选择其移民配额和积极的反恐措施来应对来自恐怖主义困扰国家的移民。一个新颖的特点是将优化配额和主动选择与劳动力市场的后果联系起来。在目的国确定两项政策后,移民决定是提供劳动力还是进行恐怖袭击,这有助于确定均衡劳动力供给和工资。该分析解释了由于更严格的反恐措施以及移民固有的激进化而导致的权利/自由丧失的边际负效用。比较静力学涉及这两个参数的变化。例如,加强对丧失权利的重视可以限制移民配额和反恐行动。相比之下,来源国激进化的增加减少了移民配额,但对最优主动措施的影响并不明确。延伸涉及防御性政策和目的国公民的激进化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Modelling
Economic Modelling ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
10.60%
发文量
295
期刊介绍: Economic Modelling fills a major gap in the economics literature, providing a single source of both theoretical and applied papers on economic modelling. The journal prime objective is to provide an international review of the state-of-the-art in economic modelling. Economic Modelling publishes the complete versions of many large-scale models of industrially advanced economies which have been developed for policy analysis. Examples are the Bank of England Model and the US Federal Reserve Board Model which had hitherto been unpublished. As individual models are revised and updated, the journal publishes subsequent papers dealing with these revisions, so keeping its readers as up to date as possible.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Volatility regimes and jumps in crude oil futures: Uncovering how market shocks trigger extreme comovements The two sides of inflation: How price increases and price cuts shape inflation Climate policy uncertainty and macroeconomic dynamics: Financial amplification and state-dependent effects How poverty alleviation improved girls’ school completion in rural China? The role of health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1