Dynamic high resolution US as primary tool in comparison to MRI in evaluation of TMJ disk anterior displacement

Ahmed Y. Ashour , Abdalwhab M.A. Zwiri , Ahmed H. Ali , Ahmed M. Mostafa , Bahaa-Eldin A. Moustafa , Husseini F. EL boraey , Alshimaa Y. Ashour , Elsayed M. Abd El-Hamid
{"title":"Dynamic high resolution US as primary tool in comparison to MRI in evaluation of TMJ disk anterior displacement","authors":"Ahmed Y. Ashour ,&nbsp;Abdalwhab M.A. Zwiri ,&nbsp;Ahmed H. Ali ,&nbsp;Ahmed M. Mostafa ,&nbsp;Bahaa-Eldin A. Moustafa ,&nbsp;Husseini F. EL boraey ,&nbsp;Alshimaa Y. Ashour ,&nbsp;Elsayed M. Abd El-Hamid","doi":"10.1016/j.tria.2025.100385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Many adults are affected by temporo-mandibular joint dysfunction (TMD). Several imaging modalities as Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and traditional radiography were used to diagnose TMD. Among these modalities, dynamic high-resolution ultrasound (US) emerges as a potential non-invasive, radiation-free method.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to compare the efficacy of US versus MRI in the assessment of TMJ displacement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study included forty patients with a clinical diagnosis of anterior disk displacement (ADD). The TMJ was imaged bilaterally using a 1.5 T MRI using a 2-mm slice width, in the sagittal and coronal planes 1–7 days after performing US. The diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasound was evaluated for disc displacement in contrast to MRI. For US the following metrics: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were used to compare the measurements versus MRI.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients were 14 male and 26 female patients (mean age 29.36 ± 7.09 years) with a duration of ADD of 3.2 ± 1.7 months. The most common clinical indications were TMJ stiffness and discomfort (85 %), followed by limited mouth opening (75 %), and TMJ sounds (crepitus/clicking) (80 %). Most patients had mild TMJ dysfunction (44.0 ± 16.42). The MRI was better in identifying TMJ abnormalities than the US. However, no significant differences were observed. Compared to MRI, US showed superior diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for TMJ disc displacements.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>According to the study's findings, US can be suggested as a very precise imaging method for identifying internal TMJ abnormalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37913,"journal":{"name":"Translational Research in Anatomy","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100385"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Research in Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214854X25000044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Many adults are affected by temporo-mandibular joint dysfunction (TMD). Several imaging modalities as Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and traditional radiography were used to diagnose TMD. Among these modalities, dynamic high-resolution ultrasound (US) emerges as a potential non-invasive, radiation-free method.

Objective

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of US versus MRI in the assessment of TMJ displacement.

Methods

This study included forty patients with a clinical diagnosis of anterior disk displacement (ADD). The TMJ was imaged bilaterally using a 1.5 T MRI using a 2-mm slice width, in the sagittal and coronal planes 1–7 days after performing US. The diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasound was evaluated for disc displacement in contrast to MRI. For US the following metrics: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were used to compare the measurements versus MRI.

Results

Patients were 14 male and 26 female patients (mean age 29.36 ± 7.09 years) with a duration of ADD of 3.2 ± 1.7 months. The most common clinical indications were TMJ stiffness and discomfort (85 %), followed by limited mouth opening (75 %), and TMJ sounds (crepitus/clicking) (80 %). Most patients had mild TMJ dysfunction (44.0 ± 16.42). The MRI was better in identifying TMJ abnormalities than the US. However, no significant differences were observed. Compared to MRI, US showed superior diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for TMJ disc displacements.

Conclusions

According to the study's findings, US can be suggested as a very precise imaging method for identifying internal TMJ abnormalities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Translational Research in Anatomy is an international peer-reviewed and open access journal that publishes high-quality original papers. Focusing on translational research, the journal aims to disseminate the knowledge that is gained in the basic science of anatomy and to apply it to the diagnosis and treatment of human pathology in order to improve individual patient well-being. Topics published in Translational Research in Anatomy include anatomy in all of its aspects, especially those that have application to other scientific disciplines including the health sciences: • gross anatomy • neuroanatomy • histology • immunohistochemistry • comparative anatomy • embryology • molecular biology • microscopic anatomy • forensics • imaging/radiology • medical education Priority will be given to studies that clearly articulate their relevance to the broader aspects of anatomy and how they can impact patient care.Strengthening the ties between morphological research and medicine will foster collaboration between anatomists and physicians. Therefore, Translational Research in Anatomy will serve as a platform for communication and understanding between the disciplines of anatomy and medicine and will aid in the dissemination of anatomical research. The journal accepts the following article types: 1. Review articles 2. Original research papers 3. New state-of-the-art methods of research in the field of anatomy including imaging, dissection methods, medical devices and quantitation 4. Education papers (teaching technologies/methods in medical education in anatomy) 5. Commentaries 6. Letters to the Editor 7. Selected conference papers 8. Case Reports
期刊最新文献
Dynamic high resolution US as primary tool in comparison to MRI in evaluation of TMJ disk anterior displacement Stature estimation and sex determination from contemporary Northeastern Thai clavicles using discriminant function and linear regression analyses Variation of lung fissure completeness and sex-based differences in lung anatomy using cadaveric lungs Laterally positioned external carotid arteries: Two cadaveric case reports Clinical implications of the hepatomesenteric trunk–case report and literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1