Cooperate with aggregation platform or not? Optimal decision for the on-demand ride service platform

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS Research in Transportation Business and Management Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101251
Lina Ma , Zhijie Tao , Qiang Wei , Baofeng Huo
{"title":"Cooperate with aggregation platform or not? Optimal decision for the on-demand ride service platform","authors":"Lina Ma ,&nbsp;Zhijie Tao ,&nbsp;Qiang Wei ,&nbsp;Baofeng Huo","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, the emergence of aggregation mode has enabled consumers to access multiple ride service platforms through a single app, including small and medium-sized platforms. This relatively inclusive and equitable traffic distribution model not only presents new opportunities for these platforms but also heightens competitiveness among them. In this context, this paper establishes models to analyze the optimal cooperation strategies of ride service platforms and the impact of various factors on these strategies under different market conditions. The findings suggest that it is optimal for ride service platforms to cooperate with the aggregation platform. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the optimal pricing and profit of a ride service platform increase with its additional network externality. In a highly competitive market, the optimal pricing and profit will decrease with the rival platform's additional network externality and increase with the congestion level of both sides. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that while the aggregation platform has the right to choose cooperation, it will only collaborate with one ride service platform if the profit distribution from this cooperation exceeds that from partnering with both platforms. For the platform without cooperation, the outcome is not always worse than before, and the conditions for this scenario are provided. Finally, based on these conclusions, corresponding managerial implications are proposed for each stakeholder.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 101251"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539524001536","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the emergence of aggregation mode has enabled consumers to access multiple ride service platforms through a single app, including small and medium-sized platforms. This relatively inclusive and equitable traffic distribution model not only presents new opportunities for these platforms but also heightens competitiveness among them. In this context, this paper establishes models to analyze the optimal cooperation strategies of ride service platforms and the impact of various factors on these strategies under different market conditions. The findings suggest that it is optimal for ride service platforms to cooperate with the aggregation platform. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the optimal pricing and profit of a ride service platform increase with its additional network externality. In a highly competitive market, the optimal pricing and profit will decrease with the rival platform's additional network externality and increase with the congestion level of both sides. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that while the aggregation platform has the right to choose cooperation, it will only collaborate with one ride service platform if the profit distribution from this cooperation exceeds that from partnering with both platforms. For the platform without cooperation, the outcome is not always worse than before, and the conditions for this scenario are provided. Finally, based on these conclusions, corresponding managerial implications are proposed for each stakeholder.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是否与聚合平台合作?为按需出行服务平台提供最优决策
近年来,聚合模式的出现使消费者可以通过一个应用程序访问多个打车服务平台,包括中小型平台。这种相对包容和公平的流量分配模式不仅为这些平台提供了新的机遇,也提高了它们之间的竞争力。在此背景下,本文通过建立模型,分析了不同市场条件下拼车服务平台的最优合作策略以及各种因素对这些策略的影响。研究结果表明,拼车服务平台与聚合平台合作是最优选择。敏感性分析表明,网约车服务平台的最优定价和利润随其网络外部性的增加而增加。在高度竞争的市场中,最优定价和利润将随着竞争对手平台的额外网络外部性而降低,随着双方的拥塞程度而增加。进一步分析发现,虽然聚合平台有选择合作的权利,但只有在合作的利润分配超过与两个平台合作的利润分配时,聚合平台才会与其中一个拼车服务平台合作。对于没有合作的平台,结果并不总是比以前差,并提供了这种情况的条件。最后,根据这些结论,对每个利益相关者提出相应的管理启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
期刊最新文献
Dry port development and hinterland air quality: Evidence from dry port developments in China Multi-scale spatiotemporal analysis of shared bike-metro interactions in Shanghai: Implications for sustainable urban mobility Commuting of teaching and administrative staff as a driver of sustainable transport policy at the university Does travel captivity affect the MaaS plan uptake? Flexible tickets and strategic revenue management in high-speed rail market competition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1