Analytical and numerical approaches to the analysis of progress curves: A methodological comparison

IF 4 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Process Biochemistry Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.procbio.2025.01.029
Thomas Waluga, Francesca von Ziegner, Mirko Skiborowski
{"title":"Analytical and numerical approaches to the analysis of progress curves: A methodological comparison","authors":"Thomas Waluga,&nbsp;Francesca von Ziegner,&nbsp;Mirko Skiborowski","doi":"10.1016/j.procbio.2025.01.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate models of the reaction kinetics of enzymatic reactions are essential for the design of biocatalytic processes. While many experimental studies still build on initial slope analysis, progress curve analysis offers the potential for modelling enzymatic reactions with a significantly lower experimental effort in terms of time and costs, but requires the solution of a dynamic nonlinear optimization problem. There are many different approaches for solving this problem for parameter regression, building on the experimental progress curve data. In order to provide some guidance for selecting an appropriate approach, this study presents a detailed comparison of two analytical and two numerical approaches analysing their strengths and weaknesses on the basis of three case studies. The analytical approaches build on the implicit and explicit integrals of the respective reaction rate equations, while the numerical approaches consider the direct numerical integration of the differential mass balance equations as well as the transformation of the dynamic problem to an algebraic problem by means of spline interpolation of the reaction data. In particular, the dependence of the results on the initial parameter estimates is evaluated, showcasing that the numerical solution with spline interpolation shows a lower dependence on the initial values providing parameter estimates comparable to the analytical approaches, which are however limited in applicability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20811,"journal":{"name":"Process Biochemistry","volume":"151 ","pages":"Pages 1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359511325000376","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate models of the reaction kinetics of enzymatic reactions are essential for the design of biocatalytic processes. While many experimental studies still build on initial slope analysis, progress curve analysis offers the potential for modelling enzymatic reactions with a significantly lower experimental effort in terms of time and costs, but requires the solution of a dynamic nonlinear optimization problem. There are many different approaches for solving this problem for parameter regression, building on the experimental progress curve data. In order to provide some guidance for selecting an appropriate approach, this study presents a detailed comparison of two analytical and two numerical approaches analysing their strengths and weaknesses on the basis of three case studies. The analytical approaches build on the implicit and explicit integrals of the respective reaction rate equations, while the numerical approaches consider the direct numerical integration of the differential mass balance equations as well as the transformation of the dynamic problem to an algebraic problem by means of spline interpolation of the reaction data. In particular, the dependence of the results on the initial parameter estimates is evaluated, showcasing that the numerical solution with spline interpolation shows a lower dependence on the initial values providing parameter estimates comparable to the analytical approaches, which are however limited in applicability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
进度曲线分析的解析和数值方法:方法比较
准确的酶促反应动力学模型对于设计生物催化过程至关重要。虽然许多实验研究仍然建立在初始斜率分析的基础上,但进度曲线分析提供了在时间和成本方面显著降低实验努力的酶促反应建模的潜力,但需要解决动态非线性优化问题。有许多不同的方法来解决这个问题的参数回归,建立在实验进展曲线数据。为了为选择合适的方法提供一些指导,本研究在三个案例研究的基础上,对两种分析方法和两种数值方法进行了详细的比较,分析了它们的优缺点。解析方法建立在各自反应速率方程的隐式和显式积分的基础上,而数值方法则考虑微分质量平衡方程的直接数值积分以及通过反应数据的样条插值将动力学问题转化为代数问题。特别是,评估了结果对初始参数估计的依赖性,表明与解析方法相比,样条插值的数值解对提供参数估计的初始值的依赖性较低,但其适用性有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Process Biochemistry
Process Biochemistry 生物-工程:化工
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
374
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Process Biochemistry is an application-orientated research journal devoted to reporting advances with originality and novelty, in the science and technology of the processes involving bioactive molecules and living organisms. These processes concern the production of useful metabolites or materials, or the removal of toxic compounds using tools and methods of current biology and engineering. Its main areas of interest include novel bioprocesses and enabling technologies (such as nanobiotechnology, tissue engineering, directed evolution, metabolic engineering, systems biology, and synthetic biology) applicable in food (nutraceutical), healthcare (medical, pharmaceutical, cosmetic), energy (biofuels), environmental, and biorefinery industries and their underlying biological and engineering principles.
期刊最新文献
Isolation, Characterization, and Nitrogen Removal Performance of a Novel Heterotrophic Nitrifying-Aerobic Denitrifying Enterobacter asburiae WZCH from Aquaculture Wastewater Synthesis and bioactivity evaluation of chalcone tethered triazolo[3,4-a]isoquinoline and 1-phenyl-3-(thiophen-2-yl)-1H-pyrazole scaffolds as potential anticancer agents on triple-negative breast cancer cells Sophoridine derivatives: Synthesis, anti–Spodoptera litura activity, and plant growth–promoting effects Optimizing anaerobic co-digestion for pulp and paper sludge for enhancing methane yield and sludge reduction through substrate synergy Environmentally friendly extraction of chitosan from Litopenaeus vannamei shell waste using organic acids: Process optimization and characterization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1