Creating an operational evaluation model for catering delivery platforms using an expanded BOCR theory

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS Research in Transportation Business and Management Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101267
Pei-Hsuan Tsai, Jia-Wei Tang
{"title":"Creating an operational evaluation model for catering delivery platforms using an expanded BOCR theory","authors":"Pei-Hsuan Tsai,&nbsp;Jia-Wei Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A comprehensive understanding of the operational evaluation model for catering delivery service platforms (CDSPs) is essential for generating revenue, gaining competitive advantages, and achieving sustainable development in the transportation industry and management, both during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study developed an operational evaluation model for CDSPs by expanding upon the benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR) theory to include a governmental perspective. The effectiveness of the model was assessed using multiple-attribute decision-making (MADM) methods. Key factors in the development of the model were identified through a literature review and survey questionnaire, resulting in five evaluation dimensions and 23 criteria. Fifteen industry experts participated in the survey. To validate causal relationships and construct an influential network relations map (INRM) for each criterion, the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method was utilised for analysis. The deterministic DEMATEL-based analytic network process (DANP) technique was utilised to calculate influential weights. The results from the INRM indicated that the most influential factors for improving CDSPs were risks, government, costs, opportunities, and benefits. Furthermore, the influential weights determined through the DANP analysis identified benefits as the most significant dimension, followed by costs, opportunities, risks, and government. This study contributes theoretically to the existing literature by incorporating the government's perspective into the BOCR framework and utilizing advanced MADM methods for model evaluation. These findings provide valuable insights for decision- makers in CDSPs, emphasising the importance of addressing risks and government-related factors while prioritising benefits to enhance performance and sustainability in the post-pandemic landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 101267"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221053952400169X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A comprehensive understanding of the operational evaluation model for catering delivery service platforms (CDSPs) is essential for generating revenue, gaining competitive advantages, and achieving sustainable development in the transportation industry and management, both during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study developed an operational evaluation model for CDSPs by expanding upon the benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR) theory to include a governmental perspective. The effectiveness of the model was assessed using multiple-attribute decision-making (MADM) methods. Key factors in the development of the model were identified through a literature review and survey questionnaire, resulting in five evaluation dimensions and 23 criteria. Fifteen industry experts participated in the survey. To validate causal relationships and construct an influential network relations map (INRM) for each criterion, the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method was utilised for analysis. The deterministic DEMATEL-based analytic network process (DANP) technique was utilised to calculate influential weights. The results from the INRM indicated that the most influential factors for improving CDSPs were risks, government, costs, opportunities, and benefits. Furthermore, the influential weights determined through the DANP analysis identified benefits as the most significant dimension, followed by costs, opportunities, risks, and government. This study contributes theoretically to the existing literature by incorporating the government's perspective into the BOCR framework and utilizing advanced MADM methods for model evaluation. These findings provide valuable insights for decision- makers in CDSPs, emphasising the importance of addressing risks and government-related factors while prioritising benefits to enhance performance and sustainability in the post-pandemic landscape.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用扩展的BOCR理论建立了外卖平台的运营评价模型
全面了解外卖服务平台(cdsp)的运营评估模型,对于在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间和之后的运输行业和管理中创造收入、获得竞争优势和实现可持续发展至关重要。本研究在效益、机会、成本和风险(BOCR)理论的基础上,引入政府视角,建立了cdsp的运营评估模型。采用多属性决策(MADM)方法对模型的有效性进行了评价。通过文献综述和调查问卷,确定了模型发展的关键因素,得出了5个评估维度和23个标准。15位行业专家参与了这项调查。为了验证因果关系并构建每个标准的影响网络关系图(INRM),采用决策试验和评估实验室(DEMATEL)方法进行分析。采用基于确定性dematel的分析网络过程(DANP)技术计算影响权重。INRM的结果表明,改善cdsp最具影响力的因素是风险、政府、成本、机会和收益。此外,通过DANP分析确定的影响力权重将收益确定为最重要的维度,其次是成本、机会、风险和政府。本研究将政府视角纳入BOCR框架,并利用先进的MADM方法对模型进行评价,为现有文献提供了理论补充。这些发现为cdsp的决策者提供了有价值的见解,强调了解决风险和政府相关因素的重要性,同时优先考虑效益,以提高大流行后的绩效和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
期刊最新文献
Public pricing policies and multidimensional efficiency in urban public transport: Evidence from French operators How passenger satisfaction affects the sustainable development of integrated passenger and freight transport based on public traffic: An evolutionary game approach Enhancing cross-border rail connectivity: A quasi-natural experiment on boosting regional innovation performance through the China-Laos railway A fuzzy decision support process for railway sleeper maintenance and renewal management Optimization approach for planning urban on-street parking considering car and truck users
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1