Hyeon-Ho Yang, Sang-Gil Lee, Eun-Hyuck Lee, Jae-Hung Han
{"title":"Numerical simulation framework of bird-inspired ornithopter in forward flight","authors":"Hyeon-Ho Yang, Sang-Gil Lee, Eun-Hyuck Lee, Jae-Hung Han","doi":"10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2024.104263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents an efficient numerical simulation framework for analyzing the flight dynamics of bird-inspired ornithopters in forward flight. The framework integrates a modified Unsteady Vortex Lattice Method (UVLM) with a Multi-Flexible-Body Dynamics (MFBD) model to simulate the Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) that occurs during the flapping flight. The UVLM is enhanced with a Pseudo-Leading-Edge Vortex (PLEV) model and an Adaptive Wake-Shedding (AWS) scheme to address limitations related to the leading edge vortex and spanwise wake-shedding. Additionally, the structural model of the ornithopter's flexible main wing is modeled using a modal-based reduced-order model generated through component mode synthesis. The framework is validated through wind tunnel tests on rigid and flexible wing models, demonstrating errors of <10 % in predicting mean lift and thrust forces. The ORNithopter Integrated Simulation Program (ORNISP), developed as a MATLAB App, is utilized to perform a flight dynamic simulation under free-flight conditions. The trim conditions for a forward flight of an ornithopter prototype named KRoFalcon (KAIST Robotic Falcon) are estimated. The simulation results show errors within 7 % for flight speed and angle of attack compared to flight test data. Additionally, the simulation results under free-flight and restricted degrees of freedom conditions are compared, and it shows that the flight simulation with restricted heaving and pitching can overestimate the aerodynamic forces. The proposed FSI simulation framework shows more efficient computational time than the FSI simulation using computational fluid dynamics and structural dynamics solvers, ensuring sufficient fidelity in aerodynamic force estimation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fluids and Structures","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104263"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fluids and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088997462400197X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents an efficient numerical simulation framework for analyzing the flight dynamics of bird-inspired ornithopters in forward flight. The framework integrates a modified Unsteady Vortex Lattice Method (UVLM) with a Multi-Flexible-Body Dynamics (MFBD) model to simulate the Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) that occurs during the flapping flight. The UVLM is enhanced with a Pseudo-Leading-Edge Vortex (PLEV) model and an Adaptive Wake-Shedding (AWS) scheme to address limitations related to the leading edge vortex and spanwise wake-shedding. Additionally, the structural model of the ornithopter's flexible main wing is modeled using a modal-based reduced-order model generated through component mode synthesis. The framework is validated through wind tunnel tests on rigid and flexible wing models, demonstrating errors of <10 % in predicting mean lift and thrust forces. The ORNithopter Integrated Simulation Program (ORNISP), developed as a MATLAB App, is utilized to perform a flight dynamic simulation under free-flight conditions. The trim conditions for a forward flight of an ornithopter prototype named KRoFalcon (KAIST Robotic Falcon) are estimated. The simulation results show errors within 7 % for flight speed and angle of attack compared to flight test data. Additionally, the simulation results under free-flight and restricted degrees of freedom conditions are compared, and it shows that the flight simulation with restricted heaving and pitching can overestimate the aerodynamic forces. The proposed FSI simulation framework shows more efficient computational time than the FSI simulation using computational fluid dynamics and structural dynamics solvers, ensuring sufficient fidelity in aerodynamic force estimation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Fluids and Structures serves as a focal point and a forum for the exchange of ideas, for the many kinds of specialists and practitioners concerned with fluid–structure interactions and the dynamics of systems related thereto, in any field. One of its aims is to foster the cross–fertilization of ideas, methods and techniques in the various disciplines involved.
The journal publishes papers that present original and significant contributions on all aspects of the mechanical interactions between fluids and solids, regardless of scale.