Numerical simulation framework of bird-inspired ornithopter in forward flight

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Fluids and Structures Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2024.104263
Hyeon-Ho Yang, Sang-Gil Lee, Eun-Hyuck Lee, Jae-Hung Han
{"title":"Numerical simulation framework of bird-inspired ornithopter in forward flight","authors":"Hyeon-Ho Yang,&nbsp;Sang-Gil Lee,&nbsp;Eun-Hyuck Lee,&nbsp;Jae-Hung Han","doi":"10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2024.104263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents an efficient numerical simulation framework for analyzing the flight dynamics of bird-inspired ornithopters in forward flight. The framework integrates a modified Unsteady Vortex Lattice Method (UVLM) with a Multi-Flexible-Body Dynamics (MFBD) model to simulate the Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) that occurs during the flapping flight. The UVLM is enhanced with a Pseudo-Leading-Edge Vortex (PLEV) model and an Adaptive Wake-Shedding (AWS) scheme to address limitations related to the leading edge vortex and spanwise wake-shedding. Additionally, the structural model of the ornithopter's flexible main wing is modeled using a modal-based reduced-order model generated through component mode synthesis. The framework is validated through wind tunnel tests on rigid and flexible wing models, demonstrating errors of &lt;10 % in predicting mean lift and thrust forces. The ORNithopter Integrated Simulation Program (ORNISP), developed as a MATLAB App, is utilized to perform a flight dynamic simulation under free-flight conditions. The trim conditions for a forward flight of an ornithopter prototype named KRoFalcon (KAIST Robotic Falcon) are estimated. The simulation results show errors within 7 % for flight speed and angle of attack compared to flight test data. Additionally, the simulation results under free-flight and restricted degrees of freedom conditions are compared, and it shows that the flight simulation with restricted heaving and pitching can overestimate the aerodynamic forces. The proposed FSI simulation framework shows more efficient computational time than the FSI simulation using computational fluid dynamics and structural dynamics solvers, ensuring sufficient fidelity in aerodynamic force estimation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fluids and Structures","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104263"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fluids and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088997462400197X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents an efficient numerical simulation framework for analyzing the flight dynamics of bird-inspired ornithopters in forward flight. The framework integrates a modified Unsteady Vortex Lattice Method (UVLM) with a Multi-Flexible-Body Dynamics (MFBD) model to simulate the Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) that occurs during the flapping flight. The UVLM is enhanced with a Pseudo-Leading-Edge Vortex (PLEV) model and an Adaptive Wake-Shedding (AWS) scheme to address limitations related to the leading edge vortex and spanwise wake-shedding. Additionally, the structural model of the ornithopter's flexible main wing is modeled using a modal-based reduced-order model generated through component mode synthesis. The framework is validated through wind tunnel tests on rigid and flexible wing models, demonstrating errors of <10 % in predicting mean lift and thrust forces. The ORNithopter Integrated Simulation Program (ORNISP), developed as a MATLAB App, is utilized to perform a flight dynamic simulation under free-flight conditions. The trim conditions for a forward flight of an ornithopter prototype named KRoFalcon (KAIST Robotic Falcon) are estimated. The simulation results show errors within 7 % for flight speed and angle of attack compared to flight test data. Additionally, the simulation results under free-flight and restricted degrees of freedom conditions are compared, and it shows that the flight simulation with restricted heaving and pitching can overestimate the aerodynamic forces. The proposed FSI simulation framework shows more efficient computational time than the FSI simulation using computational fluid dynamics and structural dynamics solvers, ensuring sufficient fidelity in aerodynamic force estimation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fluids and Structures
Journal of Fluids and Structures 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
173
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Fluids and Structures serves as a focal point and a forum for the exchange of ideas, for the many kinds of specialists and practitioners concerned with fluid–structure interactions and the dynamics of systems related thereto, in any field. One of its aims is to foster the cross–fertilization of ideas, methods and techniques in the various disciplines involved. The journal publishes papers that present original and significant contributions on all aspects of the mechanical interactions between fluids and solids, regardless of scale.
期刊最新文献
Scattering of oblique incident waves by a rigid floating structure in the presence of two surface-piercing thick porous breakwaters: Pattern of reflection, dissipation and wave forces Visualization and measurement of shock movement during transonic limit-cycle oscillation Data assimilation for turbulence-merged channel branches with the simultaneous enhancement of hydrodynamics and aeroacoustics Editorial Board Experimental investigation in nonlinear aerodynamic characteristics of a double-layer truss girder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1