“Here comes the sun”: Determinants of solar farm planning at local authority level in England

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103916
Muhammad Mohsin Hussain, Costanza Concetti, David Toke, Kathrin Thomas, Paula Duffy, Jo Vergunst
{"title":"“Here comes the sun”: Determinants of solar farm planning at local authority level in England","authors":"Muhammad Mohsin Hussain,&nbsp;Costanza Concetti,&nbsp;David Toke,&nbsp;Kathrin Thomas,&nbsp;Paula Duffy,&nbsp;Jo Vergunst","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article aims to better understand the factors influencing whether solar farm applications at local authority level in England are approved or rejected, defined as planning success. Previous research has focused on the micro-dynamics of renewable energy acceptance, but systematic research exploring the factors of renewable deployment with large N data is outstanding. We study the meso-level investigating the impact of actors and context on the approval of ground-mounted solar photovoltaic applications. The analyses rely on the Renewable Energy Planning Database provided by the United Kingdom's Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, and planning officer reports. Logistic regressions allow us to predict under what circumstances solar farm proposals in England are successful by local authorities. Our results suggest that only some actors matter: solar farm planning success seems to rely on recommendations of actors with institutional power and members of the public rather than advocacy groups. However, context also plays an important role, in particular, surrounding landscapes and planning guidelines. Robustness checks using Coarsened Exact Matching lend further confidence in our results. This implies that policymakers should address definitional and pragmatic issues that hinder the decision-making process in solar planning. This may encourage all stakeholders to employ different communication strategies in the future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103916"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624005073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to better understand the factors influencing whether solar farm applications at local authority level in England are approved or rejected, defined as planning success. Previous research has focused on the micro-dynamics of renewable energy acceptance, but systematic research exploring the factors of renewable deployment with large N data is outstanding. We study the meso-level investigating the impact of actors and context on the approval of ground-mounted solar photovoltaic applications. The analyses rely on the Renewable Energy Planning Database provided by the United Kingdom's Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, and planning officer reports. Logistic regressions allow us to predict under what circumstances solar farm proposals in England are successful by local authorities. Our results suggest that only some actors matter: solar farm planning success seems to rely on recommendations of actors with institutional power and members of the public rather than advocacy groups. However, context also plays an important role, in particular, surrounding landscapes and planning guidelines. Robustness checks using Coarsened Exact Matching lend further confidence in our results. This implies that policymakers should address definitional and pragmatic issues that hinder the decision-making process in solar planning. This may encourage all stakeholders to employ different communication strategies in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“太阳来了”:英国地方政府层面太阳能农场规划的决定因素
本文旨在更好地了解影响英国地方当局批准或拒绝太阳能发电场申请的因素,并将其定义为规划成功。以往的研究主要集中在可再生能源接受度的微观动力学方面,但利用大N数据系统探索可再生能源部署因素的研究较为突出。我们研究了中观水平调查参与者和环境对地面安装太阳能光伏应用批准的影响。这些分析依赖于英国能源安全和净零部提供的可再生能源规划数据库以及规划官员报告。逻辑回归使我们能够预测在什么情况下英国的太阳能发电场提案会被地方当局成功。我们的研究结果表明,只有一些参与者起作用:太阳能发电场规划的成功似乎依赖于有机构权力的参与者和公众成员的建议,而不是倡导团体。然而,文脉也起着重要的作用,特别是周围的景观和规划指南。使用粗化精确匹配的鲁棒性检查为我们的结果提供了进一步的信心。这意味着决策者应该解决阻碍太阳能规划决策过程的定义和实际问题。这可能会鼓励所有利益相关者在未来采用不同的沟通策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Addressing “the ones behind”: Public responses to technologies and the role of responsibility Private sector agency in low-carbon transitions: Rethinking energy security through hybrid governance in the Global South Infrastructure failures and aging populations: Quantifying the spatial overlap of power outages and older adult vulnerability The efficiency divide: Housing constraints on energy-saving practices in Darwin, Australia From anti-reflexive politicization to anti-reflexive policies: The emergence of renewable exclusion zones in United States environmental policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1