Effects of conservation tillage practices on rice yields and greenhouse gas emissions: Results from a 10-year in situ experiment

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2025.109474
Cong Wang , Huifeng Sun , Xianxian Zhang , Jining Zhang , Zheng Jiang , Sheng Zhou
{"title":"Effects of conservation tillage practices on rice yields and greenhouse gas emissions: Results from a 10-year in situ experiment","authors":"Cong Wang ,&nbsp;Huifeng Sun ,&nbsp;Xianxian Zhang ,&nbsp;Jining Zhang ,&nbsp;Zheng Jiang ,&nbsp;Sheng Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A long-term continuous in situ field experiment was conducted in the Yangtze River Delta region of China to quantify the effects of different rice-based conservation tillage (CT) practices on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and rice yields, compared to a conventional rice-wheat rotation system (RW). Four representative rice-based CT practices were evaluated: no-tillage rice-wheat rotation (RT), rice-winter fallow (RF), and rice-green manure rotation with low (RM-LN) and high nitrogen (N) fertilizer inputs (RM-HN). The RW, RT, and RF treatments were implemented continuously from 2012 to 2021. The RM-LN treatment was implemented from 2012 to 2016, followed by the RM-HN treatment in the same plots from 2017 to 2021. The results indicated that, compared to the RW treatment, the RT, RF, RM-LN, and RM-HN treatments resulted in decreases in total GHG emissions during the rice-growing season by 11.5 %, 40.2 % (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), 41.0 % (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), and 35.2 % (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), respectively, within the corresponding years of implementation. When compared to the RW treatment, the RT and RM-LN treatments significantly reduced rice yields by 6.7 % (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) and 8.7 % (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), respectively. In contrast, the RF and RM-HN treatments had no significant impact on rice yields relative to RW across the corresponding years. Consequently, relative to the RW treatment, the RF and RM-HN treatments achieved reductions in rice yield-scaled greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) of 31.3 % (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) and 34.0 % (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), respectively, across the corresponding years, while maintaining rice yields. These findings suggest that RF and RM-HN are effective CT practices for mitigating GHG emissions from rice paddies in the Yangtze River Delta region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"381 ","pages":"Article 109474"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925000064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A long-term continuous in situ field experiment was conducted in the Yangtze River Delta region of China to quantify the effects of different rice-based conservation tillage (CT) practices on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and rice yields, compared to a conventional rice-wheat rotation system (RW). Four representative rice-based CT practices were evaluated: no-tillage rice-wheat rotation (RT), rice-winter fallow (RF), and rice-green manure rotation with low (RM-LN) and high nitrogen (N) fertilizer inputs (RM-HN). The RW, RT, and RF treatments were implemented continuously from 2012 to 2021. The RM-LN treatment was implemented from 2012 to 2016, followed by the RM-HN treatment in the same plots from 2017 to 2021. The results indicated that, compared to the RW treatment, the RT, RF, RM-LN, and RM-HN treatments resulted in decreases in total GHG emissions during the rice-growing season by 11.5 %, 40.2 % (P < 0.01), 41.0 % (P < 0.05), and 35.2 % (P < 0.05), respectively, within the corresponding years of implementation. When compared to the RW treatment, the RT and RM-LN treatments significantly reduced rice yields by 6.7 % (P < 0.01) and 8.7 % (P < 0.01), respectively. In contrast, the RF and RM-HN treatments had no significant impact on rice yields relative to RW across the corresponding years. Consequently, relative to the RW treatment, the RF and RM-HN treatments achieved reductions in rice yield-scaled greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) of 31.3 % (P < 0.05) and 34.0 % (P < 0.05), respectively, across the corresponding years, while maintaining rice yields. These findings suggest that RF and RM-HN are effective CT practices for mitigating GHG emissions from rice paddies in the Yangtze River Delta region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保护性耕作对水稻产量和温室气体排放的影响:10年原位试验结果
在中国长三角地区进行了一项长期连续的原位田间试验,以量化不同水稻保护性耕作(CT)做法对温室气体(GHG)排放和水稻产量的影响,并与传统的稻麦轮作制度(RW)进行比较。评估了四种具有代表性的水稻CT做法:免耕稻-小麦轮作(RT)、水稻-冬休(RF)和低(RM-LN)和高氮(N)肥料投入(RM-HN)的水稻-绿肥轮作。RW、RT和RF处理从2012年到2021年连续实施。2012 - 2016年实施RM-LN处理,2017 - 2021年在同一地块实施RM-HN处理。结果表明,RW治疗相比,RT,射频,RM-LN,和RM-HN治疗导致的减少温室气体排放总量在水稻种植季节 % 11.5,40.2 % (P & lt; 0.01)41.0 % (P & lt; 0.05),和35.2 % (P & lt; 0.05),分别对应的年内实现。与RW处理相比,RT和RM-LN处理的水稻产量分别显著降低6.7 % (P <; 0.01)和8.7 % (P <; 0.01)。相比之下,相对于RW, RF和RM-HN处理在相应年份对水稻产量没有显著影响。因此,相对于RW处理,RF和RM-HN处理在保持水稻产量的情况下,相应年份的水稻产量比例温室气体强度(GHGI)分别降低了31.3 % (P <; 0.05)和34.0 % (P <; 0.05)。这些结果表明,RF和RM-HN是减少长三角地区稻田温室气体排放的有效CT做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
Arable soil microbial communities are affected by plant community and agricultural management Soil layer depth–driven microbial metabolic division reveals the relationship between aggregate carbon sequestration and carbon source utilization under organic amendments Grazing by livestock modifies the response of soil microbes to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide Crop diversification drives microbial-mediated nitrogen accumulation via fungal necromass stabilization Effects of nitrogen fertilization on forage production, animal performance, and greenhouse gas emissions in tropical pastures: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1