Nature–based nutrient management through returning agricultural organic waste enhances soil aggregate organic carbon stability

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2024.109467
Yini Wang , Yanzhong Yao , Bingbing Han , Simon Willcock , Jonathan Storkey , Xunzhuo Dong , Yunyao Zhong , Xiaozhong Wang , Yan Deng , Wei Zhang , Qirui Li , Xinping Chen , Zhaolei Li
{"title":"Nature–based nutrient management through returning agricultural organic waste enhances soil aggregate organic carbon stability","authors":"Yini Wang ,&nbsp;Yanzhong Yao ,&nbsp;Bingbing Han ,&nbsp;Simon Willcock ,&nbsp;Jonathan Storkey ,&nbsp;Xunzhuo Dong ,&nbsp;Yunyao Zhong ,&nbsp;Xiaozhong Wang ,&nbsp;Yan Deng ,&nbsp;Wei Zhang ,&nbsp;Qirui Li ,&nbsp;Xinping Chen ,&nbsp;Zhaolei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agricultural organic waste can enhance aggregate organic carbon stability, which is crucial for soil carbon sequestration in croplands. However, it is unclear how aggregate organic carbon stability changes with different nature–based nutrient management practices, especially with partial organic substitution. This study aimed to elucidate how different organic wastes (chicken manure, biochar, straw, and carbon–based materials from kitchen waste) influence aggregate organic carbon stability, including aggregate stability, the content of physically protected organic carbon, and the decomposability of aggregate carbon. The improvement of aggregate organic carbon stability was trialed in a 4–year field experiment with equivalent nitrogen and organic carbon input under nature–based nutrient management. The results showed that all nature–based nutrient management practices improved aggregate organic carbon stability compared to no nutrient addition. Biochar application dramatically improved aggregate organic carbon stability by 5.8–11.4 % in aggregate stability, 83.9–152.4 % in aggregate organic carbon, and 36.6–75.0 % in aggregate recalcitrant carbon content. By comparison, straw returning showed the lowest improvement in aggregate organic carbon stability, owing to substantial increases of microbial respiration and enzyme activities involved in carbon degradation. Organic carbon merely increased by 32.3 %, 33.6 %, and 29.5 % in large macroaggregates, small macroaggregates, and microaggregates, respectively. This study dissected the different efficiencies of nature–based nutrient management in improving aggregate organic carbon stability in vegetable fields. The findings highlight that appropriate nature–based nutrient management with organic waste could better implement the carbon neutrality in agroecosystems from the perspective of aggregate organic carbon stability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"381 ","pages":"Article 109467"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924005863","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural organic waste can enhance aggregate organic carbon stability, which is crucial for soil carbon sequestration in croplands. However, it is unclear how aggregate organic carbon stability changes with different nature–based nutrient management practices, especially with partial organic substitution. This study aimed to elucidate how different organic wastes (chicken manure, biochar, straw, and carbon–based materials from kitchen waste) influence aggregate organic carbon stability, including aggregate stability, the content of physically protected organic carbon, and the decomposability of aggregate carbon. The improvement of aggregate organic carbon stability was trialed in a 4–year field experiment with equivalent nitrogen and organic carbon input under nature–based nutrient management. The results showed that all nature–based nutrient management practices improved aggregate organic carbon stability compared to no nutrient addition. Biochar application dramatically improved aggregate organic carbon stability by 5.8–11.4 % in aggregate stability, 83.9–152.4 % in aggregate organic carbon, and 36.6–75.0 % in aggregate recalcitrant carbon content. By comparison, straw returning showed the lowest improvement in aggregate organic carbon stability, owing to substantial increases of microbial respiration and enzyme activities involved in carbon degradation. Organic carbon merely increased by 32.3 %, 33.6 %, and 29.5 % in large macroaggregates, small macroaggregates, and microaggregates, respectively. This study dissected the different efficiencies of nature–based nutrient management in improving aggregate organic carbon stability in vegetable fields. The findings highlight that appropriate nature–based nutrient management with organic waste could better implement the carbon neutrality in agroecosystems from the perspective of aggregate organic carbon stability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
“Biocontrol of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) in organic crops: Spatial and seasonal dynamics” Agricultural diversification across spatial levels – A contribution to resilience and sustainability? Does Intercropping improve soil aggregation and organic carbon protection? A case-study in the Semi-Arid Mediterranean Integrated anaerobic soil disinfestation and bio-organic fertilizers to alleviate continuous cropping obstacles: Improving soil health and changing bacterial communities Green infrastructure impacts in winegrowing: A systematic map
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1