Nature–based nutrient management through returning agricultural organic waste enhances soil aggregate organic carbon stability

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2024.109467
Yini Wang , Yanzhong Yao , Bingbing Han , Simon Willcock , Jonathan Storkey , Xunzhuo Dong , Yunyao Zhong , Xiaozhong Wang , Yan Deng , Wei Zhang , Qirui Li , Xinping Chen , Zhaolei Li
{"title":"Nature–based nutrient management through returning agricultural organic waste enhances soil aggregate organic carbon stability","authors":"Yini Wang ,&nbsp;Yanzhong Yao ,&nbsp;Bingbing Han ,&nbsp;Simon Willcock ,&nbsp;Jonathan Storkey ,&nbsp;Xunzhuo Dong ,&nbsp;Yunyao Zhong ,&nbsp;Xiaozhong Wang ,&nbsp;Yan Deng ,&nbsp;Wei Zhang ,&nbsp;Qirui Li ,&nbsp;Xinping Chen ,&nbsp;Zhaolei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agricultural organic waste can enhance aggregate organic carbon stability, which is crucial for soil carbon sequestration in croplands. However, it is unclear how aggregate organic carbon stability changes with different nature–based nutrient management practices, especially with partial organic substitution. This study aimed to elucidate how different organic wastes (chicken manure, biochar, straw, and carbon–based materials from kitchen waste) influence aggregate organic carbon stability, including aggregate stability, the content of physically protected organic carbon, and the decomposability of aggregate carbon. The improvement of aggregate organic carbon stability was trialed in a 4–year field experiment with equivalent nitrogen and organic carbon input under nature–based nutrient management. The results showed that all nature–based nutrient management practices improved aggregate organic carbon stability compared to no nutrient addition. Biochar application dramatically improved aggregate organic carbon stability by 5.8–11.4 % in aggregate stability, 83.9–152.4 % in aggregate organic carbon, and 36.6–75.0 % in aggregate recalcitrant carbon content. By comparison, straw returning showed the lowest improvement in aggregate organic carbon stability, owing to substantial increases of microbial respiration and enzyme activities involved in carbon degradation. Organic carbon merely increased by 32.3 %, 33.6 %, and 29.5 % in large macroaggregates, small macroaggregates, and microaggregates, respectively. This study dissected the different efficiencies of nature–based nutrient management in improving aggregate organic carbon stability in vegetable fields. The findings highlight that appropriate nature–based nutrient management with organic waste could better implement the carbon neutrality in agroecosystems from the perspective of aggregate organic carbon stability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"381 ","pages":"Article 109467"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924005863","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural organic waste can enhance aggregate organic carbon stability, which is crucial for soil carbon sequestration in croplands. However, it is unclear how aggregate organic carbon stability changes with different nature–based nutrient management practices, especially with partial organic substitution. This study aimed to elucidate how different organic wastes (chicken manure, biochar, straw, and carbon–based materials from kitchen waste) influence aggregate organic carbon stability, including aggregate stability, the content of physically protected organic carbon, and the decomposability of aggregate carbon. The improvement of aggregate organic carbon stability was trialed in a 4–year field experiment with equivalent nitrogen and organic carbon input under nature–based nutrient management. The results showed that all nature–based nutrient management practices improved aggregate organic carbon stability compared to no nutrient addition. Biochar application dramatically improved aggregate organic carbon stability by 5.8–11.4 % in aggregate stability, 83.9–152.4 % in aggregate organic carbon, and 36.6–75.0 % in aggregate recalcitrant carbon content. By comparison, straw returning showed the lowest improvement in aggregate organic carbon stability, owing to substantial increases of microbial respiration and enzyme activities involved in carbon degradation. Organic carbon merely increased by 32.3 %, 33.6 %, and 29.5 % in large macroaggregates, small macroaggregates, and microaggregates, respectively. This study dissected the different efficiencies of nature–based nutrient management in improving aggregate organic carbon stability in vegetable fields. The findings highlight that appropriate nature–based nutrient management with organic waste could better implement the carbon neutrality in agroecosystems from the perspective of aggregate organic carbon stability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过农业有机废弃物的还田,以自然为基础的养分管理提高了土壤团聚体有机碳的稳定性
农业有机废弃物可以提高团聚体有机碳的稳定性,这对农田土壤固碳至关重要。然而,目前尚不清楚的是,在不同的以自然为基础的养分管理实践中,特别是部分有机替代时,总有机碳的稳定性是如何变化的。本研究旨在阐明不同有机废弃物(鸡粪、生物炭、秸秆和厨余碳基材料)对团聚体有机碳稳定性的影响,包括团聚体稳定性、物理保护有机碳含量和团聚体碳的可分解性。通过4年氮素和有机碳等量输入的自然养分管理,对土壤团聚体有机碳稳定性的提高进行了试验研究。结果表明,与不添加养分相比,所有以自然为基础的养分管理措施都提高了总有机碳的稳定性。施用生物炭可显著提高团聚体有机碳稳定性,提高团聚体稳定性5.8 ~ 11.4 %,提高团聚体有机碳含量83.9 ~ 152.4 %,提高团聚体难阻碳含量36.6 ~ 75.0 %。相比之下,秸秆还田对总有机碳稳定性的改善程度最低,这是由于参与碳降解的微生物呼吸和酶活性大幅增加。有机碳在大团聚体、小团聚体和微团聚体中分别增加了32.3% %、33.6% %和29.5% %。本研究剖析了以自然为基础的养分管理在提高菜田总有机碳稳定性方面的不同效率。研究结果表明,从总有机碳稳定性的角度来看,适当的有机废物营养管理可以更好地实现农业生态系统的碳中和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
Arable soil microbial communities are affected by plant community and agricultural management Soil layer depth–driven microbial metabolic division reveals the relationship between aggregate carbon sequestration and carbon source utilization under organic amendments Grazing by livestock modifies the response of soil microbes to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide Crop diversification drives microbial-mediated nitrogen accumulation via fungal necromass stabilization Effects of nitrogen fertilization on forage production, animal performance, and greenhouse gas emissions in tropical pastures: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1