How to? Co-productionist relational engagement in European Union energy projects

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103911
Vera M.E. Kools, Johanna I. Höffken
{"title":"How to? Co-productionist relational engagement in European Union energy projects","authors":"Vera M.E. Kools,&nbsp;Johanna I. Höffken","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Public engagement is key in sustainable energy transitions. Engagement with energy often takes place in European Union energy projects, which is repeatedly criticized for not living to its potential to grapple with social issues. Work on co-productionist relational engagement by Science and Technology Studies (STS) can help to overcome this critique with a more reflexive perspective. In this paper we explore how relational engagement can be brought into practice in the contexts of EU energy projects. We underline the need to consider contexts of engagement when aiming to operationalise relational engagement. We make a novel connection between STS engagement literature and project management literature, and combine this with empirical insights from EU H2020 energy projects. We identify three components for enacting relational engagement in EU energy projects. First, <em>practicing</em>, entails reflecting and responding upon the way engagement evolves. Second, <em>enabling</em>, means that projects should enable relational reflections and responses with flexibility for engagement. Third, engagement in the flexible spaces needs to be <em>steered</em> through indicators and engagement practitioners' skills. This shows that relational reflections and responses are bounded by the EU energy project contexts through levels of flexibility, indicators and skills. Nevertheless, we see opportunities to work with and within the boundaries to bring relational engagement into practice. We emphasize that rather than understanding relational engagement in practice as an all-or-nothing issue, opportunities for practicing relational engagement can be embraced to foster relational engagement that reflexively opens up more diversified engagement to addresses societal challenges for inclusive energy transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103911"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624005024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public engagement is key in sustainable energy transitions. Engagement with energy often takes place in European Union energy projects, which is repeatedly criticized for not living to its potential to grapple with social issues. Work on co-productionist relational engagement by Science and Technology Studies (STS) can help to overcome this critique with a more reflexive perspective. In this paper we explore how relational engagement can be brought into practice in the contexts of EU energy projects. We underline the need to consider contexts of engagement when aiming to operationalise relational engagement. We make a novel connection between STS engagement literature and project management literature, and combine this with empirical insights from EU H2020 energy projects. We identify three components for enacting relational engagement in EU energy projects. First, practicing, entails reflecting and responding upon the way engagement evolves. Second, enabling, means that projects should enable relational reflections and responses with flexibility for engagement. Third, engagement in the flexible spaces needs to be steered through indicators and engagement practitioners' skills. This shows that relational reflections and responses are bounded by the EU energy project contexts through levels of flexibility, indicators and skills. Nevertheless, we see opportunities to work with and within the boundaries to bring relational engagement into practice. We emphasize that rather than understanding relational engagement in practice as an all-or-nothing issue, opportunities for practicing relational engagement can be embraced to foster relational engagement that reflexively opens up more diversified engagement to addresses societal challenges for inclusive energy transitions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何?参与欧盟能源项目的合作生产关系
公众参与是可持续能源转型的关键。欧盟的能源项目经常涉及能源,而这些项目因未能发挥其解决社会问题的潜力而一再受到批评。科学与技术研究(STS)在合作生产者关系参与方面的工作可以帮助克服这种批评,以更省思的视角。在本文中,我们探讨了如何在欧盟能源项目的背景下将关系参与付诸实践。我们强调,在实施关系接触时,需要考虑接触的背景。我们在STS参与文献和项目管理文献之间建立了一种新颖的联系,并将其与欧盟H2020能源项目的实证见解相结合。我们确定了在欧盟能源项目中实施关系参与的三个组成部分。首先,实践需要反思和回应参与的发展方式。第二,使能,意味着项目应该使关系反射和响应具有参与的灵活性。第三,需要通过指标和参与从业者的技能来引导对灵活空间的参与。这表明,通过灵活性、指标和技能水平,关系反思和反应受到欧盟能源项目背景的限制。然而,我们看到了合作的机会,并在边界内将关系参与付诸实践。我们强调,与其将实践中的关系参与理解为一个要么全有要么全无的问题,不如拥抱实践关系参与的机会,以促进关系参与,从而反射性地开启更多元化的参与,以应对包容性能源转型的社会挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Developing a capabilities-based low carbon transition framework: Insights from an empirical study of home improvement practices in Australia State versus private ownership: Local government preferences in wind power permitting in China Uncertainties and anticipated disturbances as drivers of tenant relocation in Swedish housing renovation Fission and friction: A systematic review of individual-level determinants of attitudes toward nuclear energy in advanced economies An inevitable future? The debate over mining for critical raw materials on Indigenous Sámi lands—A critical discourse analysis of Swedish news media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1