The infrastructural ecologies of industrial decarbonisation: Visual methods and psychosocial logics in place-based public engagement

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103874
Harriet Smith , Karen Henwood , Nick Pidgeon
{"title":"The infrastructural ecologies of industrial decarbonisation: Visual methods and psychosocial logics in place-based public engagement","authors":"Harriet Smith ,&nbsp;Karen Henwood ,&nbsp;Nick Pidgeon","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Major changes to land and sea infrastructure are underway to achieve decarbonisation of energy generation and industrial processes. People who live and work locally alongside energy production and industrial sites will most intensely experience the transitions. There are growing calls within the environment and climate change fields, and aligned social justice and policy research, to address how such change risks producing inequalities from the economic, spatial and political impacts. This paper presents research on public responses to industrial decarbonisation gathered from deliberative workshops carried out in Wales, UK. The paper offers a reframing of place that we term <em>infrastructural ecologies</em>, encapsulating the understanding of place as porous in relation to global flows whilst holding distinctive local attributes. The turn to infrastructure has shown place to involve ongoing constellations of material techno-functions entwined with psychic and sensory experiences. Change-making requires deepened understanding of how opinions are formed and remain in flux. We present a novel methodology to engage people across cognitive, emotional and affective registers. Central to the research is the use of photographs that provided tools to situate professional visions within everyday locales and meaning making as one way to level uneven power relations inherent in professionalised future visions. The paper utilises object relations theories to analyse how lively objects and psychic mechanisms are active in opinion making processes. Our discussion offers a deepened understanding of how decarbonisation of industry could align to shared goals amounting to a future that also aims to achieve social justice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103874"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004651","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Major changes to land and sea infrastructure are underway to achieve decarbonisation of energy generation and industrial processes. People who live and work locally alongside energy production and industrial sites will most intensely experience the transitions. There are growing calls within the environment and climate change fields, and aligned social justice and policy research, to address how such change risks producing inequalities from the economic, spatial and political impacts. This paper presents research on public responses to industrial decarbonisation gathered from deliberative workshops carried out in Wales, UK. The paper offers a reframing of place that we term infrastructural ecologies, encapsulating the understanding of place as porous in relation to global flows whilst holding distinctive local attributes. The turn to infrastructure has shown place to involve ongoing constellations of material techno-functions entwined with psychic and sensory experiences. Change-making requires deepened understanding of how opinions are formed and remain in flux. We present a novel methodology to engage people across cognitive, emotional and affective registers. Central to the research is the use of photographs that provided tools to situate professional visions within everyday locales and meaning making as one way to level uneven power relations inherent in professionalised future visions. The paper utilises object relations theories to analyse how lively objects and psychic mechanisms are active in opinion making processes. Our discussion offers a deepened understanding of how decarbonisation of industry could align to shared goals amounting to a future that also aims to achieve social justice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工业脱碳的基础设施生态:基于地点的公众参与中的视觉方法和社会心理逻辑
陆地和海洋基础设施正在发生重大变化,以实现能源生产和工业过程的脱碳。在能源生产和工业基地附近生活和工作的人们将最强烈地体验到这种转变。在环境和气候变化领域,以及一致的社会正义和政策研究中,越来越多的人呼吁解决这种变化如何从经济、空间和政治影响中产生不平等的风险。本文介绍了在英国威尔士进行的审议研讨会上收集的公众对工业脱碳的反应的研究。本文提供了一个我们称之为基础设施生态学的地方的重构,将对地方的理解概括为与全球流动相关的多孔性,同时保持独特的地方属性。转向基础设施已经显示出涉及与精神和感官体验交织在一起的物质技术功能的持续星座。做出改变需要加深对意见是如何形成和保持变化的理解。我们提出了一种新颖的方法来吸引人们跨越认知,情感和情感寄存器。该研究的核心是使用照片,这些照片提供了将专业愿景置于日常环境中的工具,并将意义创造作为一种方式来平衡专业化未来愿景中固有的不平衡权力关系。本文运用客体关系理论分析了鲜活的客体和心理机制在意见形成过程中的活跃程度。我们的讨论加深了对工业脱碳如何与共同目标保持一致的理解,这些目标相当于一个旨在实现社会正义的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Developing a capabilities-based low carbon transition framework: Insights from an empirical study of home improvement practices in Australia State versus private ownership: Local government preferences in wind power permitting in China Uncertainties and anticipated disturbances as drivers of tenant relocation in Swedish housing renovation Fission and friction: A systematic review of individual-level determinants of attitudes toward nuclear energy in advanced economies An inevitable future? The debate over mining for critical raw materials on Indigenous Sámi lands—A critical discourse analysis of Swedish news media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1