Afterload Reduction After Non-invasive Low-level Tragus Stimulation In Acute Heart Failure

IF 8.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiac Failure Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.10.068
Michiaki Nagai , Keigo Dote , Masaya Kato , Shota Sasaki , Sunny Po , Tarun Dasari
{"title":"Afterload Reduction After Non-invasive Low-level Tragus Stimulation In Acute Heart Failure","authors":"Michiaki Nagai ,&nbsp;Keigo Dote ,&nbsp;Masaya Kato ,&nbsp;Shota Sasaki ,&nbsp;Sunny Po ,&nbsp;Tarun Dasari","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.10.068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>While pulse pressure (PP) arises mainly from the combined influences of stroke volume and large arterial compliance, central blood pressure (BP) has been recognized as a major indicator of left ventricular (LV) afterload. Non-invasive transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation has been reported to improve cardiac function in HF patients. In this study, we investigated the relationship between active low-level transcutaneous electrical stimulation (LLTS) and change of PP and central BP in patients with acute HF (AHF).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The 22 patients hospitalized for AHF after initial stabilization (median 80 yrs, males 60%) were randomly assigned to active or sham group, and LLTS (20Hz, 1mA) was delivered using an ear clip attached to the tragus (active group) or the earlobe (sham control group) for 1hour daily over 5 days. Brachial PP and central aortic systolic pressure (CASP) and heart rate (HR) were noninvasively measured before and after stimulation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between active (n=8) and sham (n=8) groups. In the active group, PP (73.7 vs 60.8mmHg), CASP (133 vs 119mmHg) and HR (79 vs 77bpm) were significantly decreased after stimulation (all p&lt;0.05). Not PP, but the changes in CASP (-11.5 vs 8.37mmHg) and HR (-4.63 vs 2.73bpm) before and after stimulation were significantly different between active and sham groups (all p&lt;0.001). No device-related side effects were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this study, the active LLTS resulted in an acute afterload reduction in the elderly AHF patients. Non-invasive LLTS may be useful and safe for reducing afterload rather than stroke volume or large aortic stiffness in AHF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 206-207"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071916424004901","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

While pulse pressure (PP) arises mainly from the combined influences of stroke volume and large arterial compliance, central blood pressure (BP) has been recognized as a major indicator of left ventricular (LV) afterload. Non-invasive transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation has been reported to improve cardiac function in HF patients. In this study, we investigated the relationship between active low-level transcutaneous electrical stimulation (LLTS) and change of PP and central BP in patients with acute HF (AHF).

Methods

The 22 patients hospitalized for AHF after initial stabilization (median 80 yrs, males 60%) were randomly assigned to active or sham group, and LLTS (20Hz, 1mA) was delivered using an ear clip attached to the tragus (active group) or the earlobe (sham control group) for 1hour daily over 5 days. Brachial PP and central aortic systolic pressure (CASP) and heart rate (HR) were noninvasively measured before and after stimulation.

Results

Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between active (n=8) and sham (n=8) groups. In the active group, PP (73.7 vs 60.8mmHg), CASP (133 vs 119mmHg) and HR (79 vs 77bpm) were significantly decreased after stimulation (all p<0.05). Not PP, but the changes in CASP (-11.5 vs 8.37mmHg) and HR (-4.63 vs 2.73bpm) before and after stimulation were significantly different between active and sham groups (all p<0.001). No device-related side effects were observed.

Conclusion

In this study, the active LLTS resulted in an acute afterload reduction in the elderly AHF patients. Non-invasive LLTS may be useful and safe for reducing afterload rather than stroke volume or large aortic stiffness in AHF.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性心力衰竭无创低水平耳屏刺激后负荷降低
脉压(PP)主要受脑卒中量和大动脉顺应性的综合影响,而中心血压(BP)已被认为是左心室后负荷的主要指标。据报道,无创经皮迷走神经刺激可改善心功能。在这项研究中,我们探讨了低水平经皮电刺激(LLTS)与急性心衰(AHF)患者PP和中央血压变化的关系。方法将22例AHF住院患者(中位年龄80岁,男性60%)随机分为活动组和假手术组,使用耳夹贴耳膜(活动组)或耳垂(假手术对照组),每天1小时,持续5天。无创测量刺激前后肱动脉PP、中央主动脉收缩压(CASP)和心率(HR)。结果活动组(n=8)和假手术组(n=8)的基线特征无显著差异。在活性组,刺激后PP (73.7 vs 60.8mmHg)、CASP (133 vs 119mmHg)和HR (79 vs 77bpm)显著降低(p < 0.05)。活性组和假手术组刺激前后CASP (-11.5 vs 8.37mmHg)和HR (-4.63 vs 2.73bpm)的变化差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。未观察到与器械相关的副作用。在这项研究中,活跃的LLTS导致老年AHF患者急性后负荷减轻。非侵入性LLTS可能对减少AHF后负荷有用且安全,而不是减少卒中容量或大主动脉僵硬度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: Integrating Pharmacologic, Device, and Advanced Heart Failure Therapies. Performance of the HFpEF-ABA, H2FPEF, and HFA-PEFF Algorithms in HFpEF: A Participant-Level Pooled Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Importance of the Physiological Examination in Cardiogenic Shock. Table of Contents Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1