{"title":"To manage or abolish energy poverty? A governmentality analysis","authors":"Lee Towers","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article examines energy poverty in England with a focus on community energy actors providing energy advice in food banks and an immigration advice centre in the South East. It employs a governmentality perspective using a four-part analytical framework examining visibilities, techniques and technologies of government, political rationalities and subjectivities. The specific methods employed were participant observation and semi-structured interviews. I found a distinct difference in how government and funders see and act on this problem, to how community energy and associated actors see and act on this problem. The former see energy poverty as an issue of individual households' energy inefficiency and policy is focused on this, although without really addressing the problem. The latter see energy poverty as connected to the broader issue of multidimensional poverty, or many aspects of the current political economy impoverishing people. These differing ways of constructing the problem/solution lead to very different broader questions. On the one hand, the governance perspective asks how to <em>manage</em> energy poverty, which assumes this problem will and should continue. On the other hand, community energy and associated actors question the purpose of our energy system and by implication the wider political system. It is in the latter's questions that we will find a just transformation this country and the wider world needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103880"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004717","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article examines energy poverty in England with a focus on community energy actors providing energy advice in food banks and an immigration advice centre in the South East. It employs a governmentality perspective using a four-part analytical framework examining visibilities, techniques and technologies of government, political rationalities and subjectivities. The specific methods employed were participant observation and semi-structured interviews. I found a distinct difference in how government and funders see and act on this problem, to how community energy and associated actors see and act on this problem. The former see energy poverty as an issue of individual households' energy inefficiency and policy is focused on this, although without really addressing the problem. The latter see energy poverty as connected to the broader issue of multidimensional poverty, or many aspects of the current political economy impoverishing people. These differing ways of constructing the problem/solution lead to very different broader questions. On the one hand, the governance perspective asks how to manage energy poverty, which assumes this problem will and should continue. On the other hand, community energy and associated actors question the purpose of our energy system and by implication the wider political system. It is in the latter's questions that we will find a just transformation this country and the wider world needs.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.