“For all kinds of reasons, it hasn't happened”: A novel integrative perspective for analysing the barriers to biomass crops for bioenergy in the United Kingdom

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.103936
Julie Ingram, Jane Mills, Honor Mackley-Ward
{"title":"“For all kinds of reasons, it hasn't happened”: A novel integrative perspective for analysing the barriers to biomass crops for bioenergy in the United Kingdom","authors":"Julie Ingram,&nbsp;Jane Mills,&nbsp;Honor Mackley-Ward","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Upscaling perennial biomass crops (PBC) for bioenergy is a key element of decarbonisation plans in the UK. However uptake of PBC by farmers has been historically poor and the bioenergy industry nascent, reflecting international contexts. This has been problematised from a number of social, economic and policy perspectives and scales. Positioning this work in transition studies, we aim to examine barriers and enablers to upscaling <em>Miscanthus</em> and SRC willow feedstock for bioenergy and greenhouse gas removal in the UK. This study applies a conceptual framework that inserts farm level perspectives such as sociocultural motivations into an Innovation Systems (IS) functions approach. Qualitative data was collected in semi-structured interviews and participatory workshops with farmers (PBC growers and non-growers) and selected IS stakeholders (advisers, land agents, biomass industry intermediaries/supply chain, agriculture, environment, forestry, policy and NGO representatives). Analysis was structured around seven IS functions considered necessary for IS build-up, integrating macro and micro levels. This approach offers a deep integrated understanding of barriers and enablers to upscaling PBC. Results showed misalignment of the IS functions which are iteratively entangled with farm level actors' social processes and decisions, something which have hitherto been little understood or theorised in the bioenergy context. Identifying potential intervention points to improve system performance and understanding how farmers and other stakeholders negotiate demands for PBC are particularly relevant to policy makers' ambitions for large scale planting and GGR projections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103936"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000179","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Upscaling perennial biomass crops (PBC) for bioenergy is a key element of decarbonisation plans in the UK. However uptake of PBC by farmers has been historically poor and the bioenergy industry nascent, reflecting international contexts. This has been problematised from a number of social, economic and policy perspectives and scales. Positioning this work in transition studies, we aim to examine barriers and enablers to upscaling Miscanthus and SRC willow feedstock for bioenergy and greenhouse gas removal in the UK. This study applies a conceptual framework that inserts farm level perspectives such as sociocultural motivations into an Innovation Systems (IS) functions approach. Qualitative data was collected in semi-structured interviews and participatory workshops with farmers (PBC growers and non-growers) and selected IS stakeholders (advisers, land agents, biomass industry intermediaries/supply chain, agriculture, environment, forestry, policy and NGO representatives). Analysis was structured around seven IS functions considered necessary for IS build-up, integrating macro and micro levels. This approach offers a deep integrated understanding of barriers and enablers to upscaling PBC. Results showed misalignment of the IS functions which are iteratively entangled with farm level actors' social processes and decisions, something which have hitherto been little understood or theorised in the bioenergy context. Identifying potential intervention points to improve system performance and understanding how farmers and other stakeholders negotiate demands for PBC are particularly relevant to policy makers' ambitions for large scale planting and GGR projections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Overcoming barriers and seizing opportunities for smart meters in developing countries: Insights from a large-scale field study in India Understanding local opposition to renewable energy projects in the nordic countries: A systematic literature review Measuring the invisible: A framework for quantifying energy justice in urban communities in the United States Men and the mask: Dramaturgical mask-wearing, masculinities and oilmen's ‘stoical’ emotional shielding practices in Scotland's offshore oilfields Challenging epistemic hierarchy: Reincorporating societal risks into nuclear safety goals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1