Watered down justice: Experiences of the offshore wind transition in Northeast coastal communities in the United States

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103919
Tiffany Smythe , Emma Korein , Sara Swett , David Bidwell , Jeremy Firestone , Kelsey Leonard
{"title":"Watered down justice: Experiences of the offshore wind transition in Northeast coastal communities in the United States","authors":"Tiffany Smythe ,&nbsp;Emma Korein ,&nbsp;Sara Swett ,&nbsp;David Bidwell ,&nbsp;Jeremy Firestone ,&nbsp;Kelsey Leonard","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Offshore wind is a growing part of coastal states' energy portfolios and is undergoing rapid expansion in the United States. A robust body of research examines this transition through the lens of energy justice, which we employed in an exploratory qualitative analysis of offshore wind in northeast United States coastal communities where the first projects are located. Our goal was to investigate community members' experiences of distributive, recognition, and procedural justice regarding offshore wind development. We selected five frontline coastal communities and conducted 37 interviews, seeking representation from local/state governments; port/working waterfront businesses; the fishing community, and community groups, with a focus on low-income and Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) community members. Thematic analysis of interviews revealed six themes and associated sub-themes synthesizing participants' experiences. Analysis revealed that community members observed and experienced linkages between distributive, recognition and procedural forms of justice. Findings both illustrate these linkages and provide insights into the individual tenets. Participants experienced the government-led planning and permitting process itself as the problem. They believed that the primacy of local communities was inadequately recognized, and held complex and nuanced views of benefits and burdens. Further, participants observed that low-income and BIPOC community members are experiencing injustices. Results support multiple recommendations for research and practice, including an integrated approach to energy justice scholarship and practice that acknowledges the linkages between the three justice tenets. We also recommend process improvements and a commitment to engaging with and supporting low-income and BIPOC communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103919"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624005103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Offshore wind is a growing part of coastal states' energy portfolios and is undergoing rapid expansion in the United States. A robust body of research examines this transition through the lens of energy justice, which we employed in an exploratory qualitative analysis of offshore wind in northeast United States coastal communities where the first projects are located. Our goal was to investigate community members' experiences of distributive, recognition, and procedural justice regarding offshore wind development. We selected five frontline coastal communities and conducted 37 interviews, seeking representation from local/state governments; port/working waterfront businesses; the fishing community, and community groups, with a focus on low-income and Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) community members. Thematic analysis of interviews revealed six themes and associated sub-themes synthesizing participants' experiences. Analysis revealed that community members observed and experienced linkages between distributive, recognition and procedural forms of justice. Findings both illustrate these linkages and provide insights into the individual tenets. Participants experienced the government-led planning and permitting process itself as the problem. They believed that the primacy of local communities was inadequately recognized, and held complex and nuanced views of benefits and burdens. Further, participants observed that low-income and BIPOC community members are experiencing injustices. Results support multiple recommendations for research and practice, including an integrated approach to energy justice scholarship and practice that acknowledges the linkages between the three justice tenets. We also recommend process improvements and a commitment to engaging with and supporting low-income and BIPOC communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
淡化的正义:美国东北沿海社区海上风电转型的经验
海上风电是沿海各州能源组合中日益增长的一部分,在美国正在迅速扩张。一个强大的研究机构通过能源正义的视角审视了这一转变,我们对第一个项目所在的美国东北部沿海社区的海上风电进行了探索性定性分析。我们的目标是调查社区成员在海上风电开发的分配、认可和程序正义方面的经验。我们选择了五个前线沿海社区,进行了37次访谈,寻求地方/州政府的代表;港口/工作的滨水业务;渔业社区和社区团体,重点关注低收入和黑人、土著和有色人种(BIPOC)社区成员。访谈的主题分析揭示了六个主题和相关的子主题,综合了参与者的经历。分析显示,社区成员观察到并体验到分配、承认和程序形式正义之间的联系。研究结果既说明了这些联系,也提供了对个别原则的见解。与会者认为,政府主导的规划和许可过程本身就是问题所在。他们认为,地方社区的首要地位没有得到充分认识,对利益和负担的看法复杂而微妙。此外,与会者注意到低收入和BIPOC社区成员正在经历不公正待遇。研究结果支持对研究和实践的多种建议,包括对能源司法学术和实践的综合方法,该方法承认三大司法原则之间的联系。我们还建议改进流程,并承诺与低收入和BIPOC社区接触并提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Developing a capabilities-based low carbon transition framework: Insights from an empirical study of home improvement practices in Australia State versus private ownership: Local government preferences in wind power permitting in China Uncertainties and anticipated disturbances as drivers of tenant relocation in Swedish housing renovation Fission and friction: A systematic review of individual-level determinants of attitudes toward nuclear energy in advanced economies An inevitable future? The debate over mining for critical raw materials on Indigenous Sámi lands—A critical discourse analysis of Swedish news media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1