Conflicting injustices in decolonization and indigenous land rights: The case of the Lake Turkana Wind Power project

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103912
Jacobo Ramirez , Eleonora Costantino , Christiane Durach , Jury Flickenschild , Han Chen Sun , Ikal Ang'elei , Paul Lekapana
{"title":"Conflicting injustices in decolonization and indigenous land rights: The case of the Lake Turkana Wind Power project","authors":"Jacobo Ramirez ,&nbsp;Eleonora Costantino ,&nbsp;Christiane Durach ,&nbsp;Jury Flickenschild ,&nbsp;Han Chen Sun ,&nbsp;Ikal Ang'elei ,&nbsp;Paul Lekapana","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the injustices faced by Indigenous peoples when they are not clearly recognized in green energy investments, taking the Lake Turkana Wind Power (LTWP) project in Kenya as a case study. The Indigeneity of Lake Turkana's self-identified Indigenous communities is deeply rooted in their ancestral lands. However, Kenya's ambiguity in categorizing Indigenous peoples and its detachment from international frameworks such as ILO 169 contribute to the perpetuation of energy injustices. The LTWP consortium exploits this ambiguity to detach itself from claims of “illegal” land acquisition. Meanwhile, the affected communities face fragmentation, restricted mobility, and involuntary resettlement. This research, grounded in decoloniality and pluriversalism approach, highlights the dynamics of symbolic attachment and detachment that influence Indigenous energy justice and land rights. By recognizing multiple ways of knowing and being, it argues for a decolonial shift that respects Indigenous sovereignty and integrates their perspectives into sustainable development frameworks. This study underscores the necessity of respecting Indigenous rights as a pathway toward achieving true justice and sustainability in energy projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103912"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624005036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the injustices faced by Indigenous peoples when they are not clearly recognized in green energy investments, taking the Lake Turkana Wind Power (LTWP) project in Kenya as a case study. The Indigeneity of Lake Turkana's self-identified Indigenous communities is deeply rooted in their ancestral lands. However, Kenya's ambiguity in categorizing Indigenous peoples and its detachment from international frameworks such as ILO 169 contribute to the perpetuation of energy injustices. The LTWP consortium exploits this ambiguity to detach itself from claims of “illegal” land acquisition. Meanwhile, the affected communities face fragmentation, restricted mobility, and involuntary resettlement. This research, grounded in decoloniality and pluriversalism approach, highlights the dynamics of symbolic attachment and detachment that influence Indigenous energy justice and land rights. By recognizing multiple ways of knowing and being, it argues for a decolonial shift that respects Indigenous sovereignty and integrates their perspectives into sustainable development frameworks. This study underscores the necessity of respecting Indigenous rights as a pathway toward achieving true justice and sustainability in energy projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在非殖民化和土著土地权利冲突的不公正:图尔卡纳湖风力发电项目的案例
本研究以肯尼亚图尔卡纳湖风力发电(LTWP)项目为例,考察了土著人民在绿色能源投资中没有得到明确承认时所面临的不公正待遇。图尔卡纳湖自我认同的土著社区的土著性深深植根于他们祖先的土地。然而,肯尼亚对土著人民的模糊分类及其与国际劳工组织169等国际框架的脱节导致了能源不公正的持续存在。LTWP财团利用这种模糊性将自己与“非法”土地征用的主张分离开来。与此同时,受影响的社区面临着分裂、流动受限和非自愿重新安置的问题。这项研究以非殖民化和多元主义方法为基础,突出了影响土著能源正义和土地权利的象征性依恋和超然的动态。通过承认认识和存在的多种方式,它主张尊重土著主权并将其观点纳入可持续发展框架的非殖民化转变。这项研究强调必须尊重土著人民的权利,以此作为实现能源项目真正公正和可持续性的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Developing a capabilities-based low carbon transition framework: Insights from an empirical study of home improvement practices in Australia State versus private ownership: Local government preferences in wind power permitting in China Uncertainties and anticipated disturbances as drivers of tenant relocation in Swedish housing renovation Fission and friction: A systematic review of individual-level determinants of attitudes toward nuclear energy in advanced economies An inevitable future? The debate over mining for critical raw materials on Indigenous Sámi lands—A critical discourse analysis of Swedish news media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1