DECODING TOTAL FERTILIZATION FAILURE IN INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION CYCLES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SPERM AND OOCYTE PARAMETERS

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Reproductive biomedicine online Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104579
Selahattin Emiroglu , Havva Yesilleme , Miray Berber , Cihan Cakir , Gurkan Uncu
{"title":"DECODING TOTAL FERTILIZATION FAILURE IN INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION CYCLES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SPERM AND OOCYTE PARAMETERS","authors":"Selahattin Emiroglu ,&nbsp;Havva Yesilleme ,&nbsp;Miray Berber ,&nbsp;Cihan Cakir ,&nbsp;Gurkan Uncu","doi":"10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div><strong>This</strong> study aimed to identify parameters associated with total fertilization failure in ICSI cycles. Specifically, we investigated which male and female factors contribute to total fertilization failure. Additionally, we sought to identify patient populations at risk for total fertilization failure to develop preventive strategies for future cases.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study was conducted at the Bursa Uludağ University ART Center between 2011 and 2024. ICSI was performed on all retrieved oocytes. The study group included patients who had at least three oocytes retrieved and experienced total fertilization failure(n=98). The control group comprised patients with a fertilization rate above 80%(n=937). Comparative evaluations were made between the two groups regarding patients' baseline characteristics, basal hormonal parameters, ovarian stimulation profiles, semen parameters, and oocyte quality scores. Additionally, ovarian response was assessed using the Follicular Output Rate(FORT) and Follicle-to-Oocyte Index(FOI) in both groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between significant variables and fertilization failure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Baseline parameters between the study and control groups were statistically similar, indicating no significant differences in initial characteristics except for infertility duration<em>(p=0.002)</em> and etiology<em>(p&lt;0.001)</em>. Semen analysis, however, revealed that the study group had significantly lower sperm concentration(<em>p=0.002)</em> and motility<em>(p&lt;0.001)</em> compared to the control group, while sperm morphology<em>(p=0.492)</em> percentages were similar between the groups. The rate of azoospermia was also higher in the fertilization failure group. Concerning oocyte parameters, the study group showed a significantly lower FOI<em>(p=0.007)</em> compared to the control group, while oocyte maturation rates<em>(p=0.166)</em> were similar between the groups. Despite these differences, oocyte quality scores were comparable<em>(p=0.272)</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Our study highlights that total fertilization failure in ICSI cycles is significantly associated with lower sperm concentration, reduced motility, and azoospermia. Despite similar baseline parameters and oocyte quality scores between the study and control groups, the study group experienced no successful fertilization. These findings suggest that sperm factors are more crucial than oocyte quality in predicting fertilization success.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In conclusion, semen parameters, including lower sperm concentration and reduced motility, are key factors associated with total fertilization failure in ICSI cycles. These parameters should be closely monitored to identify patients at higher risk for total fertilization failure. Addressing these factors may improve fertilization outcomes and guide the development of targeted interventions to reduce total fertilization failure rates in future cycles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21134,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive biomedicine online","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 104579"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive biomedicine online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648324007685","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to identify parameters associated with total fertilization failure in ICSI cycles. Specifically, we investigated which male and female factors contribute to total fertilization failure. Additionally, we sought to identify patient populations at risk for total fertilization failure to develop preventive strategies for future cases.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at the Bursa Uludağ University ART Center between 2011 and 2024. ICSI was performed on all retrieved oocytes. The study group included patients who had at least three oocytes retrieved and experienced total fertilization failure(n=98). The control group comprised patients with a fertilization rate above 80%(n=937). Comparative evaluations were made between the two groups regarding patients' baseline characteristics, basal hormonal parameters, ovarian stimulation profiles, semen parameters, and oocyte quality scores. Additionally, ovarian response was assessed using the Follicular Output Rate(FORT) and Follicle-to-Oocyte Index(FOI) in both groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between significant variables and fertilization failure.

Results

Baseline parameters between the study and control groups were statistically similar, indicating no significant differences in initial characteristics except for infertility duration(p=0.002) and etiology(p<0.001). Semen analysis, however, revealed that the study group had significantly lower sperm concentration(p=0.002) and motility(p<0.001) compared to the control group, while sperm morphology(p=0.492) percentages were similar between the groups. The rate of azoospermia was also higher in the fertilization failure group. Concerning oocyte parameters, the study group showed a significantly lower FOI(p=0.007) compared to the control group, while oocyte maturation rates(p=0.166) were similar between the groups. Despite these differences, oocyte quality scores were comparable(p=0.272).

Discussion

Our study highlights that total fertilization failure in ICSI cycles is significantly associated with lower sperm concentration, reduced motility, and azoospermia. Despite similar baseline parameters and oocyte quality scores between the study and control groups, the study group experienced no successful fertilization. These findings suggest that sperm factors are more crucial than oocyte quality in predicting fertilization success.

Conclusion

In conclusion, semen parameters, including lower sperm concentration and reduced motility, are key factors associated with total fertilization failure in ICSI cycles. These parameters should be closely monitored to identify patients at higher risk for total fertilization failure. Addressing these factors may improve fertilization outcomes and guide the development of targeted interventions to reduce total fertilization failure rates in future cycles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解码卵胞浆内单精子注射周期的总受精失败:精子和卵母细胞参数的比较分析
目的研究ICSI周期中与全受精失败相关的参数。具体来说,我们调查了哪些男性和女性因素导致了完全受精失败。此外,我们试图确定有完全受精失败风险的患者群体,为未来的病例制定预防策略。材料与方法本回顾性研究于2011年至2024年在Bursa uludaku大学艺术中心进行。对所有取出的卵母细胞进行ICSI。研究组包括至少有三个卵母细胞被取出并经历完全受精失败的患者(n=98)。对照组为受精率大于80%的患者(n=937)。比较两组患者的基线特征、基础激素参数、卵巢刺激谱、精液参数和卵母细胞质量评分。此外,使用两组的卵泡输出率(FORT)和卵泡-卵母细胞指数(FOI)评估卵巢反应。采用Logistic回归分析检验显著变量与施肥失败的关系。结果研究组和对照组的基线参数在统计学上相似,表明除了不孕持续时间(p=0.002)和病因(p= 0.001)外,初始特征无显著差异。然而,精液分析显示,与对照组相比,研究组的精子浓度(p=0.002)和活动力(p= 0.001)显著降低,而两组之间的精子形态百分比(p=0.492)相似。受精失败组无精子症发生率也较高。在卵母细胞参数方面,实验组卵泡指数(FOI)显著低于对照组(p=0.007),而卵母细胞成熟率(p=0.166)与对照组相似。尽管存在这些差异,但卵母细胞质量评分具有可比性(p=0.272)。我们的研究强调,ICSI周期中的完全受精失败与精子浓度降低、运动能力降低和无精子症显著相关。尽管实验组和对照组的基线参数和卵母细胞质量评分相似,但实验组没有成功受精。这些发现表明,在预测受精成功方面,精子因素比卵母细胞质量更重要。结论精子浓度降低和活力降低是导致ICSI周期全受精失败的关键因素。应密切监测这些参数,以识别全受精失败风险较高的患者。解决这些因素可能会改善受精结果,并指导制定有针对性的干预措施,以降低未来周期的总受精失败率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive biomedicine online
Reproductive biomedicine online 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.50%
发文量
391
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Reproductive BioMedicine Online covers the formation, growth and differentiation of the human embryo. It is intended to bring to public attention new research on biological and clinical research on human reproduction and the human embryo including relevant studies on animals. It is published by a group of scientists and clinicians working in these fields of study. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, academics and patients. Context: The period of human embryonic growth covered is between the formation of the primordial germ cells in the fetus until mid-pregnancy. High quality research on lower animals is included if it helps to clarify the human situation. Studies progressing to birth and later are published if they have a direct bearing on events in the earlier stages of pregnancy.
期刊最新文献
Impact of the number of trophectoderm cells biopsied on the quality of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy Physician AI literacy: A key to unlocking AI's clinical potential Microbial contamination of ART culture media with Enterococcus faecalis: case report of a live birth following blastocyst transfer Response to: Physician AI Literacy: A Key to Unlocking AI's Clinical Potential Changing the narrative for poor-prognosis patients in IVF: unlocking success through a multicycle approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1