Analysis of modeling and performance for PV and energy storage integration in suburban railways

IF 4.6 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Control Engineering Practice Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106252
Nutthaka Chinomi , Zhongbei Tian , Ning Yang , Nakaret Kano , Kejian Song , Lin Jiang
{"title":"Analysis of modeling and performance for PV and energy storage integration in suburban railways","authors":"Nutthaka Chinomi ,&nbsp;Zhongbei Tian ,&nbsp;Ning Yang ,&nbsp;Nakaret Kano ,&nbsp;Kejian Song ,&nbsp;Lin Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rail sector faces growing pressure to reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions, in line with global sustainability goals. Electrification of rail routes, along with the integration of renewable energy sources (RES), has become critical for enhancing energy efficiency and minimizing emissions. This study explores the integration of photovoltaic (PV) systems and energy storage systems (ESS) into AC railways, focusing on their impact on energy consumption and overall system performance. A mathematical model of the railway system is developed, and two case studies are performed on a standard AC railway route servicing suburban train. The model’s accuracy is validated according to the British Standard EN50641 under both normal and outage conditions, with results generally aligning with reference values, except for a minor deviation observed during outage scenarios. In Case Study 1, an initial examination compares integration at the substation level with integration at the catenary level, aiming to provide insights into various integration locations. The analysis reveals that the lowest daily operational cost is achieved at the substation integration point (0 km). However, integration at the 20 km catenary point achieves a comparable cost reduction, with a decrease of 8.6%, and the cost difference between the two locations is negligible, at only 0.01%. Following this, Case Study 2 investigates how varying capacities of PV and ESS affect energy generation and daily operational costs. The findings indicate that increasing capacities leads to expected reductions in both energy generation and operational costs. Nevertheless, these cost reductions may not be optimal due to the ESS control strategy employed in the study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 106252"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066125000152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rail sector faces growing pressure to reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions, in line with global sustainability goals. Electrification of rail routes, along with the integration of renewable energy sources (RES), has become critical for enhancing energy efficiency and minimizing emissions. This study explores the integration of photovoltaic (PV) systems and energy storage systems (ESS) into AC railways, focusing on their impact on energy consumption and overall system performance. A mathematical model of the railway system is developed, and two case studies are performed on a standard AC railway route servicing suburban train. The model’s accuracy is validated according to the British Standard EN50641 under both normal and outage conditions, with results generally aligning with reference values, except for a minor deviation observed during outage scenarios. In Case Study 1, an initial examination compares integration at the substation level with integration at the catenary level, aiming to provide insights into various integration locations. The analysis reveals that the lowest daily operational cost is achieved at the substation integration point (0 km). However, integration at the 20 km catenary point achieves a comparable cost reduction, with a decrease of 8.6%, and the cost difference between the two locations is negligible, at only 0.01%. Following this, Case Study 2 investigates how varying capacities of PV and ESS affect energy generation and daily operational costs. The findings indicate that increasing capacities leads to expected reductions in both energy generation and operational costs. Nevertheless, these cost reductions may not be optimal due to the ESS control strategy employed in the study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城郊铁路光伏储能一体化建模与性能分析
铁路部门面临着越来越大的压力,需要减少能源消耗和碳排放,以符合全球可持续发展目标。铁路电气化以及可再生能源的整合已成为提高能源效率和减少排放的关键。本研究探讨了光伏(PV)系统和储能系统(ESS)在交流铁路中的集成,重点研究了它们对能耗和整体系统性能的影响。建立了铁路系统的数学模型,并对服务郊区列车的标准交流铁路线路进行了两个案例研究。该模型的准确性根据英国标准EN50641在正常和停机条件下进行了验证,结果与参考值基本一致,除了在停机情况下观察到的轻微偏差。在案例研究1中,初步检查比较了变电站级别的集成与接触网级别的集成,旨在提供对各种集成位置的见解。分析表明,在变电站集成点(0公里)处实现了最低的日运行成本。然而,在20公里接触网点的集成实现了类似的成本降低,降低了8.6%,两个位置之间的成本差异可以忽略不计,仅为0.01%。在此之后,案例研究2探讨了不同容量的光伏和ESS对能源生产和日常运营成本的影响。调查结果表明,产能的增加将导致能源生产和运营成本的预期降低。然而,由于研究中采用的ESS控制策略,这些成本降低可能不是最佳的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Control Engineering Practice
Control Engineering Practice 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
12.20%
发文量
183
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper. The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC. Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.
期刊最新文献
Fixed-time sliding mode tracking control of a remotely operated vehicle based on fully actuated system theory Pre-Shift fill control of wet clutches in heavy tracked vehicles using velocity prediction and a model predictive control framework Safe reinforcement learning framework for high-obstacle climbing in heavy wheeled-legged robots Prior knowledge-augmented sparse wavelet spatio-temporal graph network for anomaly detection of electric submersible pumps Horizon-one model-predictive control with stability guarantee for a permanent magnet synchronous motor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1