Comparing food waste interests and environmental concerns in young adults: A qualitative reasoning approach

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Cognitive Systems Research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1016/j.cogsys.2024.101318
Konstantina Zacharaki, Queralt Prat-i-Pubill, Jennifer Nguyen, Nil Agell, Núria Agell
{"title":"Comparing food waste interests and environmental concerns in young adults: A qualitative reasoning approach","authors":"Konstantina Zacharaki,&nbsp;Queralt Prat-i-Pubill,&nbsp;Jennifer Nguyen,&nbsp;Nil Agell,&nbsp;Núria Agell","doi":"10.1016/j.cogsys.2024.101318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The large amount of food waste produced worldwide highlights the urgent need to investigate this phenomenon promptly with new methods in order to reduce it. In the present work, we consider a qualitative reasoning approach in an attempt to understand people’s interest in the food waste (FW) problem. In this direction, we run an in-person taste experiment and acquire data from 310 participants. We apply a measure based on hesitant linguistic terms sets (HLTS) to capture the degree of interest towards the environment as individuals respond to the New Environmental Paradigm scale (NEP) (<span><span>Dunlap et al., 2000</span></span>). We also calculate an index of hesitancy based on participants’ responses. Previously, they had to decide on whether a piece of fruit allegedly coming from the supermarket tastes better than another one allegedly coming from an alternative source such as applications designed to reduce food waste.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55242,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Systems Research","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 101318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041724001128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The large amount of food waste produced worldwide highlights the urgent need to investigate this phenomenon promptly with new methods in order to reduce it. In the present work, we consider a qualitative reasoning approach in an attempt to understand people’s interest in the food waste (FW) problem. In this direction, we run an in-person taste experiment and acquire data from 310 participants. We apply a measure based on hesitant linguistic terms sets (HLTS) to capture the degree of interest towards the environment as individuals respond to the New Environmental Paradigm scale (NEP) (Dunlap et al., 2000). We also calculate an index of hesitancy based on participants’ responses. Previously, they had to decide on whether a piece of fruit allegedly coming from the supermarket tastes better than another one allegedly coming from an alternative source such as applications designed to reduce food waste.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较年轻人对食物浪费的兴趣和对环境的关注:一种定性推理方法
世界范围内产生的大量食物浪费突出表明迫切需要用新方法及时调查这一现象,以减少它。在目前的工作中,我们考虑一种定性推理方法,试图了解人们对食物浪费(FW)问题的兴趣。在这个方向上,我们进行了一次亲自品尝实验,并从310名参与者那里获得了数据。我们采用一种基于犹豫语言术语集(HLTS)的测量方法来捕捉个人对新环境范式量表(NEP)的反应时对环境的兴趣程度(Dunlap et al., 2000)。我们还根据参与者的反应计算出犹豫指数。此前,他们必须决定一块据称来自超市的水果是否比另一块据称来自其他来源(如旨在减少食物浪费的应用程序)的水果味道更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Systems Research
Cognitive Systems Research 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Systems Research is dedicated to the study of human-level cognition. As such, it welcomes papers which advance the understanding, design and applications of cognitive and intelligent systems, both natural and artificial. The journal brings together a broad community studying cognition in its many facets in vivo and in silico, across the developmental spectrum, focusing on individual capacities or on entire architectures. It aims to foster debate and integrate ideas, concepts, constructs, theories, models and techniques from across different disciplines and different perspectives on human-level cognition. The scope of interest includes the study of cognitive capacities and architectures - both brain-inspired and non-brain-inspired - and the application of cognitive systems to real-world problems as far as it offers insights relevant for the understanding of cognition. Cognitive Systems Research therefore welcomes mature and cutting-edge research approaching cognition from a systems-oriented perspective, both theoretical and empirically-informed, in the form of original manuscripts, short communications, opinion articles, systematic reviews, and topical survey articles from the fields of Cognitive Science (including Philosophy of Cognitive Science), Artificial Intelligence/Computer Science, Cognitive Robotics, Developmental Science, Psychology, and Neuroscience and Neuromorphic Engineering. Empirical studies will be considered if they are supplemented by theoretical analyses and contributions to theory development and/or computational modelling studies.
期刊最新文献
(Mis)perceiving others: toward a second-person science of schizophrenia Progressive integration of the functions of attentional networks through a bioinspired framework composed of computational services User perception of mobile application usability: do individual differences matter? Editorial Board Representativity and univocity of traffic signs and their effect on trajectory movement in a driving-simulation task: regulatory signs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1