Exploring temporal and spatial patterns and nonlinear driving mechanism of park perceptions: A multi-source big data study

IF 12 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Sustainable Cities and Society Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2024.106083
Xukai Zhao , He Huang , Guangsi Lin , Yuxing Lu
{"title":"Exploring temporal and spatial patterns and nonlinear driving mechanism of park perceptions: A multi-source big data study","authors":"Xukai Zhao ,&nbsp;He Huang ,&nbsp;Guangsi Lin ,&nbsp;Yuxing Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2024.106083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To fully realize the benefits of parks, they must be both accessible and usable, with those excelling in these aspects often perceived as more attractive. Traditional surveys for evaluating perceived park accessibility, usability, and attractiveness are expensive and time-consuming, prompting the adoption of social media data as a viable alternative. This study fine-tuned the Chinese-RoBERTa-wwm-ext model on a specially curated dataset to measure perceived accessibility, usability, and attractiveness across 270 parks in Beijing and Guangzhou through 153,872 online comments. We conducted statistical analyses to uncover temporal patterns and incorporate park perception scores into the 2SFCA method for spatial distribution analysis. Additionally, we utilized XGBoost, SHAP, and PDP to investigate the nonlinear driving mechanisms behind these perceptions. Key findings include: (1) Park visitation demonstrates a strong seasonal pattern, with central urban parks consistently outperforming suburban ones; (2) Central subdistricts might face reduced park services due to high population demands; (3) Accessibility is significantly influenced by ticket pricing and transportation availability, especially bus stations; (4) Usability is optimal at a moderate density of sports and fitness facilities (22 per km<sup>2</sup>) and proximity to residential areas; (5) Attractiveness benefits from closeness to the Central Business District and amenities such as toilets and restaurants, with a critical park size threshold of 9 km<sup>2</sup>. These public-oriented analyses identify areas for improvement and factors shaping public perceptions, providing valuable guidance for strategic decision-making and effective urban management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 106083"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670724009053","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To fully realize the benefits of parks, they must be both accessible and usable, with those excelling in these aspects often perceived as more attractive. Traditional surveys for evaluating perceived park accessibility, usability, and attractiveness are expensive and time-consuming, prompting the adoption of social media data as a viable alternative. This study fine-tuned the Chinese-RoBERTa-wwm-ext model on a specially curated dataset to measure perceived accessibility, usability, and attractiveness across 270 parks in Beijing and Guangzhou through 153,872 online comments. We conducted statistical analyses to uncover temporal patterns and incorporate park perception scores into the 2SFCA method for spatial distribution analysis. Additionally, we utilized XGBoost, SHAP, and PDP to investigate the nonlinear driving mechanisms behind these perceptions. Key findings include: (1) Park visitation demonstrates a strong seasonal pattern, with central urban parks consistently outperforming suburban ones; (2) Central subdistricts might face reduced park services due to high population demands; (3) Accessibility is significantly influenced by ticket pricing and transportation availability, especially bus stations; (4) Usability is optimal at a moderate density of sports and fitness facilities (22 per km2) and proximity to residential areas; (5) Attractiveness benefits from closeness to the Central Business District and amenities such as toilets and restaurants, with a critical park size threshold of 9 km2. These public-oriented analyses identify areas for improvement and factors shaping public perceptions, providing valuable guidance for strategic decision-making and effective urban management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公园感知的时空格局与非线性驱动机制:一个多源大数据研究
为了充分实现公园的好处,它们必须既方便又可用,在这些方面表现出色的公园通常被认为更有吸引力。传统的评估公园可达性、可用性和吸引力的调查既昂贵又耗时,这促使人们采用社交媒体数据作为可行的替代方案。本研究在一个特别策划的数据集上对中国- roberta - wm-ext模型进行了微调,通过153,872条在线评论来衡量北京和广州270个公园的可达性、可用性和吸引力。我们通过统计分析揭示了时间模式,并将公园感知得分纳入2SFCA方法进行空间分布分析。此外,我们利用XGBoost、SHAP和PDP来研究这些感知背后的非线性驱动机制。主要发现包括:(1)公园游客表现出强烈的季节性特征,中心城市公园的游客表现始终优于郊区公园;(2)由于人口需求旺盛,中心街道可能面临公园服务减少的问题;(3)可达性受车票价格和交通可达性的显著影响,尤其是公交车站;(4)体育健身设施密度适中(22个/ km2)、靠近居民区时,可用性最佳;(5)公园的吸引力来自于靠近中央商务区和厕所、餐厅等便利设施,公园的临界面积阈值为9平方公里。这些面向公众的分析确定了需要改进的领域和影响公众看法的因素,为战略决策和有效的城市管理提供了宝贵的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Cities and Society
Sustainable Cities and Society Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
13.70%
发文量
810
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including: 1. Smart cities and resilient environments; 2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management; 3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management); 4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities; 5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments; 6. Green infrastructure and BMPs; 7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management; 8. Urban agriculture and forestry; 9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure; 10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy; 11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities; 12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities; 13. Health monitoring and improvement; 14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies; 15. Smart city governance; 16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society; 17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies; 18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems. 19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management; 20. Waste reduction and recycling; 21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling; 22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;
期刊最新文献
Precision governance for urban decarbonization: Decoupling passenger and freight transport emissions by integrating explainable AI and clustering Evaluating the collective effects of vertical and ground greening on microclimate and energy consumption in a high-density building array “It’s fair once you’re in it” - Comparing public and government perceptions on Zero Emission Vehicle policy Physics-informed neural network calibration and application for urban cooling A CFD-CONTAM-BES framework incorporates wind pressure, air temperature, and indoor air circulation to estimate energy consumption of high-rise buildings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1