Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines

Yueqiao Jin , Lixiang Yan , Vanessa Echeverria , Dragan Gašević , Roberto Martinez-Maldonado
{"title":"Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines","authors":"Yueqiao Jin ,&nbsp;Lixiang Yan ,&nbsp;Vanessa Echeverria ,&nbsp;Dragan Gašević ,&nbsp;Roberto Martinez-Maldonado","doi":"10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integrating generative AI (GAI) into higher education is crucial for preparing a future generation of GAI-literate students. However, a comprehensive understanding of global institutional adoption policies remains absent, with most prior studies focusing on the Global North and lacking a theoretical lens. This study utilizes the Diffusion of Innovations Theory to examine GAI adoption strategies in higher education across 40 universities from six global regions. It explores the characteristics of GAI innovation, including compatibility, trialability, and observability, and analyses the communication channels and roles and responsibilities outlined in university policies and guidelines. The findings reveal that universities are proactively addressing GAI integration by emphasising academic integrity, enhancing teaching and learning practices, and promoting equity. Key policy measures include the development of guidelines for ethical GAI use, the design of authentic assessments to mitigate misuse, and the provision of training programs for faculty and students to foster GAI literacy. Despite these efforts, gaps remain in comprehensive policy frameworks, particularly in addressing data privacy concerns and ensuring equitable access to GAI tools. The study underscores the importance of clear communication channels, stakeholder collaboration, and ongoing evaluation to support effective GAI adoption. These insights provide actionable insights for policymakers to craft inclusive, transparent, and adaptive strategies for integrating GAI into higher education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34469,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X24001516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrating generative AI (GAI) into higher education is crucial for preparing a future generation of GAI-literate students. However, a comprehensive understanding of global institutional adoption policies remains absent, with most prior studies focusing on the Global North and lacking a theoretical lens. This study utilizes the Diffusion of Innovations Theory to examine GAI adoption strategies in higher education across 40 universities from six global regions. It explores the characteristics of GAI innovation, including compatibility, trialability, and observability, and analyses the communication channels and roles and responsibilities outlined in university policies and guidelines. The findings reveal that universities are proactively addressing GAI integration by emphasising academic integrity, enhancing teaching and learning practices, and promoting equity. Key policy measures include the development of guidelines for ethical GAI use, the design of authentic assessments to mitigate misuse, and the provision of training programs for faculty and students to foster GAI literacy. Despite these efforts, gaps remain in comprehensive policy frameworks, particularly in addressing data privacy concerns and ensuring equitable access to GAI tools. The study underscores the importance of clear communication channels, stakeholder collaboration, and ongoing evaluation to support effective GAI adoption. These insights provide actionable insights for policymakers to craft inclusive, transparent, and adaptive strategies for integrating GAI into higher education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育中的生成人工智能:机构采用政策和指导方针的全球视角
将生成式人工智能(GAI)整合到高等教育中,对于培养下一代具有生成式人工智能能力的学生至关重要。然而,对全球机构收养政策的全面理解仍然缺乏,大多数先前的研究都集中在全球北方,缺乏理论视角。本研究运用创新扩散理论,考察了全球6个地区40所大学在高等教育中采用GAI的策略。它探讨了GAI创新的特点,包括兼容性、可试验性和可观察性,并分析了大学政策和指导方针中概述的沟通渠道和角色和责任。研究结果表明,大学正在通过强调学术诚信、加强教学实践和促进公平来积极解决GAI整合问题。关键的政策措施包括制定道德GAI使用指南,设计真实的评估以减少误用,以及为教师和学生提供培训计划以培养GAI素养。尽管做出了这些努力,但在综合政策框架方面仍存在差距,特别是在解决数据隐私问题和确保公平获得GAI工具方面。该研究强调了明确的沟通渠道、利益相关者协作和持续评估对支持有效采用GAI的重要性。这些见解为政策制定者制定包容性、透明度和适应性战略,将GAI纳入高等教育提供了可操作的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Conversational AI in children's home literacy learning: effectiveness, advantages, challenges, and family perception Enhancing AI literacy for educators: Where to start and to what end? Artificial intelligence literacy at school: A systematic review with a focus on psychological foundations Large language models for education: An open-source paradigm for automated Q&A in the graduate classroom Generative AI in higher education: A bibliometric review of emerging trends, power dynamics, and global research landscapes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1