Applicability and benefits of Standardised Nursing Terminology in Australia: A scoping review

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Collegian Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.colegn.2024.10.001
Rebecca M. Jedwab , Kerri Holzhauser , Kalpana Raghunathan , Zara K.M. Lord , Sally P. Duncan , Melanie A. Murray , Janette Gogler , Evelyn J.S. Hovenga AM
{"title":"Applicability and benefits of Standardised Nursing Terminology in Australia: A scoping review","authors":"Rebecca M. Jedwab ,&nbsp;Kerri Holzhauser ,&nbsp;Kalpana Raghunathan ,&nbsp;Zara K.M. Lord ,&nbsp;Sally P. Duncan ,&nbsp;Melanie A. Murray ,&nbsp;Janette Gogler ,&nbsp;Evelyn J.S. Hovenga AM","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Standardised Nursing Terminologies (SNTs) provide a set of agreed terms that are aligned to nurses’ assessments, interventions, and nurse-sensitive patient care outcomes. The use of such a terminology allows for improved visibility of nursing care and comparisons of interventions and outcomes to support and assess evidence-based practice. Whilst SNTs have been in use internationally for decades, there is a gap in practice and literature related to SNTs throughout Australia.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The objectives of this review were to explore recent literature to identify and understand (i) the benefits of SNTs, (ii) the limitations of SNTs, and (iii) the potential scope of SNTs for the Australian context.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scoping review was undertaken to search relevant literature in CINAHL, Cochrane Review, EMBASE, IEEE Xplore, Medline Complete, and Scopus databases using a date range of 2015–2023.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>A total of 36 studies were reviewed, none of which were Australian. Main benefits associated with integrating SNTs into health records include improved nursing documentation quality, facilitate visibility of nursing care, and enable nursing practice quality improvement. Key limitations identified were the lack of evidence about correlation between nurses’ knowledge level and the use of SNT in practice, lack of strong evidence related to benefits in terms of patient outcomes, workflow efficiencies or enhanced communication, poor representation of nursing practice in SNTs, and mapping limitations to achieve interoperability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In order to support SNT implementation and adoption throughout Australia, there is a need for Australian research as well as a national strategy for the adoption of an SNT taxonomy in Australia. This requires stakeholder policy development, government support to ensure standardisation, and broad education at academic and local level to enable comprehensive systems’ integration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"31 6","pages":"Pages 404-420"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000660","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Standardised Nursing Terminologies (SNTs) provide a set of agreed terms that are aligned to nurses’ assessments, interventions, and nurse-sensitive patient care outcomes. The use of such a terminology allows for improved visibility of nursing care and comparisons of interventions and outcomes to support and assess evidence-based practice. Whilst SNTs have been in use internationally for decades, there is a gap in practice and literature related to SNTs throughout Australia.

Purpose

The objectives of this review were to explore recent literature to identify and understand (i) the benefits of SNTs, (ii) the limitations of SNTs, and (iii) the potential scope of SNTs for the Australian context.

Methods

A scoping review was undertaken to search relevant literature in CINAHL, Cochrane Review, EMBASE, IEEE Xplore, Medline Complete, and Scopus databases using a date range of 2015–2023.

Findings

A total of 36 studies were reviewed, none of which were Australian. Main benefits associated with integrating SNTs into health records include improved nursing documentation quality, facilitate visibility of nursing care, and enable nursing practice quality improvement. Key limitations identified were the lack of evidence about correlation between nurses’ knowledge level and the use of SNT in practice, lack of strong evidence related to benefits in terms of patient outcomes, workflow efficiencies or enhanced communication, poor representation of nursing practice in SNTs, and mapping limitations to achieve interoperability.

Conclusions

In order to support SNT implementation and adoption throughout Australia, there is a need for Australian research as well as a national strategy for the adoption of an SNT taxonomy in Australia. This requires stakeholder policy development, government support to ensure standardisation, and broad education at academic and local level to enable comprehensive systems’ integration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Collegian
Collegian NURSING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN). The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues. Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor. The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription. ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Music therapy in intensive care: Family perspectives on humanising care Graduate nurses’ experience of support, training, and education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study A realist-informed exploration of factors influencing nurses’ management of mental state deterioration in acute hospital settings Advocating for patient safety: Power dynamics in nurse advocacy practice in Australia—An integrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1