Can large language models meet the challenge of generating school-level questions?

Q1 Social Sciences Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100370
Subhankar Maity, Aniket Deroy, Sudeshna Sarkar
{"title":"Can large language models meet the challenge of generating school-level questions?","authors":"Subhankar Maity,&nbsp;Aniket Deroy,&nbsp;Sudeshna Sarkar","doi":"10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the realm of education, crafting appropriate questions for examinations is a meticulous and time-consuming task that is crucial for assessing students' understanding of the subject matter. This paper explores the potential of leveraging large language models (LLMs) to automate question generation in the educational domain. Specifically, we focus on generating educational questions from contexts extracted from school-level textbooks. Our study aims to prompt LLMs such as GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-3.5 Turbo, Llama-2-70B, Llama-3.1-405B, and Gemini Pro to generate a complete set of questions for each context, potentially streamlining the question generation process for educators. We performed a human evaluation of the generated questions, assessing their <em>coverage</em>, <em>grammaticality</em>, <em>usefulness</em>, <em>answerability</em>, and <em>relevance</em>. Additionally, we prompted LLMs to generate questions based on Bloom's revised taxonomy, categorizing and evaluating these questions according to their cognitive complexity and learning objectives. We applied both zero-shot and eight-shot prompting techniques. These efforts provide insight into the efficacy of LLMs in automated question generation and their potential in assessing students' cognitive abilities across various school-level subjects. The results show that employing an eight-shot technique improves the performance of human evaluation metrics for the generated complete set of questions and helps generate questions that are better aligned with Bloom's revised taxonomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34469,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100370"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X25000104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the realm of education, crafting appropriate questions for examinations is a meticulous and time-consuming task that is crucial for assessing students' understanding of the subject matter. This paper explores the potential of leveraging large language models (LLMs) to automate question generation in the educational domain. Specifically, we focus on generating educational questions from contexts extracted from school-level textbooks. Our study aims to prompt LLMs such as GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-3.5 Turbo, Llama-2-70B, Llama-3.1-405B, and Gemini Pro to generate a complete set of questions for each context, potentially streamlining the question generation process for educators. We performed a human evaluation of the generated questions, assessing their coverage, grammaticality, usefulness, answerability, and relevance. Additionally, we prompted LLMs to generate questions based on Bloom's revised taxonomy, categorizing and evaluating these questions according to their cognitive complexity and learning objectives. We applied both zero-shot and eight-shot prompting techniques. These efforts provide insight into the efficacy of LLMs in automated question generation and their potential in assessing students' cognitive abilities across various school-level subjects. The results show that employing an eight-shot technique improves the performance of human evaluation metrics for the generated complete set of questions and helps generate questions that are better aligned with Bloom's revised taxonomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大型语言模型能否应对生成学校级别问题的挑战?
在教育领域,为考试精心设计合适的问题是一项细致而耗时的任务,这对于评估学生对主题的理解至关重要。本文探讨了利用大型语言模型(llm)在教育领域自动生成问题的潜力。具体来说,我们专注于从学校教科书中提取的上下文中生成教育问题。我们的研究旨在促使法学硕士(如GPT-4 Turbo、GPT-3.5 Turbo、Llama-2-70B、Llama-3.1-405B和Gemini Pro)为每种环境生成一套完整的问题,从而潜在地简化教育工作者的问题生成过程。我们对生成的问题进行了人工评估,评估它们的覆盖范围、语法性、有用性、可回答性和相关性。此外,我们还促使法学硕士根据Bloom的修订分类法生成问题,并根据问题的认知复杂性和学习目标对这些问题进行分类和评估。我们同时使用了零发和八发提示技术。这些努力提供了法学硕士在自动问题生成方面的功效,以及它们在评估学生跨各个学校水平学科的认知能力方面的潜力。结果表明,采用八次射击技术提高了生成的完整问题集的人类评估指标的性能,并有助于生成与Bloom修订后的分类法更好地一致的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Decoding divides: The role of socioeconomic status and personality traits in AI divides and educational inequality Scaffolding critical thinking with generative AI: Design principles for integrating large language models in higher education Opening the blackbox of LLM-based automated essay scoring: Insights into feature weighting patterns and score validity Engagement in LLM chatbot-supported learning: The pivotal roles of GenAI competency and emotion Play with AI (PL-AI): A play-centered, design-based curriculum for AI literacy in pre-K and kindergarten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1