Evaluation of interlocking block pavement performance under varying construction conditions by model chamber tests

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Case Studies in Construction Materials Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e04067
Inhyun Kim, Choong-Ki Chung, Jung-Hyun Ryu
{"title":"Evaluation of interlocking block pavement performance under varying construction conditions by model chamber tests","authors":"Inhyun Kim,&nbsp;Choong-Ki Chung,&nbsp;Jung-Hyun Ryu","doi":"10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e04067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the demand for interlocking block pavements (IBPs) grows to accommodate diverse traffic loads, it is crucial to comprehensively understand how construction conditions, such as block thickness, joint width, and bedding thickness, affect IBP performance. This study addresses these factors through a series of repeated loading tests on model IBPs constructed with bedding thicknesses of 30, 50, and 80 mm and joint widths of 5 and 8 mm for 100 mm-thick general blocks, and bedding thicknesses of 50, 80, and 110 mm with a joint width of 5 mm for 160 mm-thick heavy-duty blocks. The performance of IBPs was evaluated based on deflection resistance, load-dispersion ability, and interlocking effect, the latter being assessed through the relative deflection of adjoining blocks, a key mechanism for load resistance in IBPs. The results demonstrated that an enhanced interlocking effect was achievable with a bedding thickness of 50 mm and a joint width of 5 mm for general blocks. Additionally, heavy-duty blocks required an increased bedding thickness of 80 mm to achieve greater interlocking. Under these conditions, the blocks rotated sufficiently to produce an arching effect and higher relative deflection. Conversely, IBPs constructed under inadequate conditions exhibited rutting failures, with a maximum block uplift of 0.374 mm due to excessive stress transmission to the base and bedding sand migration. Finally, the elastic modulus, estimated from transmitted stress, reached higher values of 5417.06 and 2075.45 MPa for general and heavy-duty blocks, respectively, under optimal construction conditions. This study highlights the importance of construction factors in ensuring IBP performance and suggests that both deflection and interlocking effect should be considered key performance indicators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9641,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Construction Materials","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article e04067"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Construction Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214509524012191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the demand for interlocking block pavements (IBPs) grows to accommodate diverse traffic loads, it is crucial to comprehensively understand how construction conditions, such as block thickness, joint width, and bedding thickness, affect IBP performance. This study addresses these factors through a series of repeated loading tests on model IBPs constructed with bedding thicknesses of 30, 50, and 80 mm and joint widths of 5 and 8 mm for 100 mm-thick general blocks, and bedding thicknesses of 50, 80, and 110 mm with a joint width of 5 mm for 160 mm-thick heavy-duty blocks. The performance of IBPs was evaluated based on deflection resistance, load-dispersion ability, and interlocking effect, the latter being assessed through the relative deflection of adjoining blocks, a key mechanism for load resistance in IBPs. The results demonstrated that an enhanced interlocking effect was achievable with a bedding thickness of 50 mm and a joint width of 5 mm for general blocks. Additionally, heavy-duty blocks required an increased bedding thickness of 80 mm to achieve greater interlocking. Under these conditions, the blocks rotated sufficiently to produce an arching effect and higher relative deflection. Conversely, IBPs constructed under inadequate conditions exhibited rutting failures, with a maximum block uplift of 0.374 mm due to excessive stress transmission to the base and bedding sand migration. Finally, the elastic modulus, estimated from transmitted stress, reached higher values of 5417.06 and 2075.45 MPa for general and heavy-duty blocks, respectively, under optimal construction conditions. This study highlights the importance of construction factors in ensuring IBP performance and suggests that both deflection and interlocking effect should be considered key performance indicators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模型室试验评价不同施工条件下联锁砌块路面性能
随着对互锁块路面(IBPs)的需求不断增长,以适应不同的交通荷载,全面了解施工条件(如砌块厚度、接缝宽度和层理厚度)对IBP性能的影响至关重要。本研究通过一系列重复加载试验解决了这些因素,对100 mm厚的普通块体的层理厚度为30、50和80 mm,接缝宽度为5和8 mm,对160 mm厚的重型块体的层理厚度为50、80和110 mm,接缝宽度为5 mm的模型IBPs进行了一系列重复加载试验。IBPs的性能评估主要基于抗挠度、载荷分散能力和联锁效应,后者通过相邻块体的相对挠度来评估,这是IBPs抗载荷的关键机制。结果表明,当层理厚度为50 mm,节理宽度为5 mm时,一般块体的联锁效果增强。此外,重型区块需要增加80 mm的层理厚度,以实现更大的联锁。在这些条件下,砌块充分旋转以产生拱形效应和较高的相对挠度。相反,在不适当的条件下建造的ibp则出现车辙破坏,由于过度的应力传递到基底和层理砂运移,最大块体隆升0.374 mm。最后,在最优施工条件下,普通砌块和重型砌块的弹性模量分别达到5417.06和2075.45 MPa。本研究强调了结构因素在确保IBP性能中的重要性,并建议挠度和联锁效应应被视为关键性能指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
842
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Case Studies in Construction Materials provides a forum for the rapid publication of short, structured Case Studies on construction materials. In addition, the journal also publishes related Short Communications, Full length research article and Comprehensive review papers (by invitation). The journal will provide an essential compendium of case studies for practicing engineers, designers, researchers and other practitioners who are interested in all aspects construction materials. The journal will publish new and novel case studies, but will also provide a forum for the publication of high quality descriptions of classic construction material problems and solutions.
期刊最新文献
Study on mechanical properties and microscopic mechanism of expansive soil improved by eggshell ash-silica fume composite Utilization of industrial by-products as binders and fine aggregates for one-part lightweight controlled low-strength materials: Turning waste to value approach Clay activation through CO2-derived oxalic acid for advancing its reactivity and strength of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) A deep learning framework for microstructural analysis of nano-modified cementitious composites using metal intrusion and BSE imaging Design and evaluation of restoration strategies for a fractured ancient stone stele (618–907 CE): Experimental characterization, numerical simulation and theoretical analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1