Investigating the willingness of shifting to MaaS in one-trip scenarios: Insights from comparative stated surveys

IF 6.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2025.104384
Enjian Yao , He Hao , Long Pan , Rongsheng Chen , Yue Wang , Hui Xiao
{"title":"Investigating the willingness of shifting to MaaS in one-trip scenarios: Insights from comparative stated surveys","authors":"Enjian Yao ,&nbsp;He Hao ,&nbsp;Long Pan ,&nbsp;Rongsheng Chen ,&nbsp;Yue Wang ,&nbsp;Hui Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Considered as a potential solution to improve transport systems, Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) has attracted considerable attention and has been widely studied. However, how to guide users to shift from their current travel behavior (or non-MaaS) to MaaS at its early stage still needs more insights, which is critical for the sustainable development of MaaS. Motivated by this, we conducted a stated preference (SP) survey in Beijing with a novel experiment manner, which provides respondents with comparative scenarios to ask them to focus on differences between MaaS options and provided unimodal modes. Further, a latent-class-based model is developed, integrating travel habit and cross-scenario variables collected from the comparative SP experiments. According to the estimation results, we obtain two classes. The first represents respondents who tend to be familiar with MaaS and use shared mobility, and the other represents car enthusiasts. With respect to the preferences of these two classes, respondents in the former class may generate higher utility for all MaaS options. That said, they also tend to keep their mode choice in the scenario without MaaS when they choose private cars or taxis. On the contrary, respondents in the latter class may be negative about all MaaS options. Despite this, the previous mode choice of public transportation (PT) positively affects choosing MaaS options including PT. Further, we propose the shift to MaaS index to quantify willingness to shift to MaaS. Our findings demonstrate that respondents in class 1 are much more likely to shift to MaaS, and decreasing trip time does not have a strong effect on shifting to MaaS. Accordingly, some insights and policy implications are proposed for MaaS development, including promotional strategies, current transport mode changes, and the direction of MaaS development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 104384"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000126","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considered as a potential solution to improve transport systems, Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) has attracted considerable attention and has been widely studied. However, how to guide users to shift from their current travel behavior (or non-MaaS) to MaaS at its early stage still needs more insights, which is critical for the sustainable development of MaaS. Motivated by this, we conducted a stated preference (SP) survey in Beijing with a novel experiment manner, which provides respondents with comparative scenarios to ask them to focus on differences between MaaS options and provided unimodal modes. Further, a latent-class-based model is developed, integrating travel habit and cross-scenario variables collected from the comparative SP experiments. According to the estimation results, we obtain two classes. The first represents respondents who tend to be familiar with MaaS and use shared mobility, and the other represents car enthusiasts. With respect to the preferences of these two classes, respondents in the former class may generate higher utility for all MaaS options. That said, they also tend to keep their mode choice in the scenario without MaaS when they choose private cars or taxis. On the contrary, respondents in the latter class may be negative about all MaaS options. Despite this, the previous mode choice of public transportation (PT) positively affects choosing MaaS options including PT. Further, we propose the shift to MaaS index to quantify willingness to shift to MaaS. Our findings demonstrate that respondents in class 1 are much more likely to shift to MaaS, and decreasing trip time does not have a strong effect on shifting to MaaS. Accordingly, some insights and policy implications are proposed for MaaS development, including promotional strategies, current transport mode changes, and the direction of MaaS development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Equitable tradable parking permit scheme for shared nonpublic parking management How does differentiated subsidy adjustment influence new energy vehicle sales? Beyond project segments: An econometric evaluation of traffic network volume forecasting Exploring the potential adoption of Mobility-as-a-Service in Beijing: A spatial agent-based model Understanding ride-sourcing drivers' working patterns based on platform operations data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1