Investigating the willingness of shifting to MaaS in one-trip scenarios: Insights from comparative stated surveys

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2025.104384
Enjian Yao , He Hao , Long Pan , Rongsheng Chen , Yue Wang , Hui Xiao
{"title":"Investigating the willingness of shifting to MaaS in one-trip scenarios: Insights from comparative stated surveys","authors":"Enjian Yao ,&nbsp;He Hao ,&nbsp;Long Pan ,&nbsp;Rongsheng Chen ,&nbsp;Yue Wang ,&nbsp;Hui Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Considered as a potential solution to improve transport systems, Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) has attracted considerable attention and has been widely studied. However, how to guide users to shift from their current travel behavior (or non-MaaS) to MaaS at its early stage still needs more insights, which is critical for the sustainable development of MaaS. Motivated by this, we conducted a stated preference (SP) survey in Beijing with a novel experiment manner, which provides respondents with comparative scenarios to ask them to focus on differences between MaaS options and provided unimodal modes. Further, a latent-class-based model is developed, integrating travel habit and cross-scenario variables collected from the comparative SP experiments. According to the estimation results, we obtain two classes. The first represents respondents who tend to be familiar with MaaS and use shared mobility, and the other represents car enthusiasts. With respect to the preferences of these two classes, respondents in the former class may generate higher utility for all MaaS options. That said, they also tend to keep their mode choice in the scenario without MaaS when they choose private cars or taxis. On the contrary, respondents in the latter class may be negative about all MaaS options. Despite this, the previous mode choice of public transportation (PT) positively affects choosing MaaS options including PT. Further, we propose the shift to MaaS index to quantify willingness to shift to MaaS. Our findings demonstrate that respondents in class 1 are much more likely to shift to MaaS, and decreasing trip time does not have a strong effect on shifting to MaaS. Accordingly, some insights and policy implications are proposed for MaaS development, including promotional strategies, current transport mode changes, and the direction of MaaS development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 104384"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000126","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considered as a potential solution to improve transport systems, Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) has attracted considerable attention and has been widely studied. However, how to guide users to shift from their current travel behavior (or non-MaaS) to MaaS at its early stage still needs more insights, which is critical for the sustainable development of MaaS. Motivated by this, we conducted a stated preference (SP) survey in Beijing with a novel experiment manner, which provides respondents with comparative scenarios to ask them to focus on differences between MaaS options and provided unimodal modes. Further, a latent-class-based model is developed, integrating travel habit and cross-scenario variables collected from the comparative SP experiments. According to the estimation results, we obtain two classes. The first represents respondents who tend to be familiar with MaaS and use shared mobility, and the other represents car enthusiasts. With respect to the preferences of these two classes, respondents in the former class may generate higher utility for all MaaS options. That said, they also tend to keep their mode choice in the scenario without MaaS when they choose private cars or taxis. On the contrary, respondents in the latter class may be negative about all MaaS options. Despite this, the previous mode choice of public transportation (PT) positively affects choosing MaaS options including PT. Further, we propose the shift to MaaS index to quantify willingness to shift to MaaS. Our findings demonstrate that respondents in class 1 are much more likely to shift to MaaS, and decreasing trip time does not have a strong effect on shifting to MaaS. Accordingly, some insights and policy implications are proposed for MaaS development, including promotional strategies, current transport mode changes, and the direction of MaaS development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查在一次旅行场景中转向MaaS的意愿:来自比较陈述调查的见解
作为一种改善交通系统的潜在解决方案,移动即服务(MaaS)已经引起了广泛的关注和研究。然而,如何引导用户从目前的出行行为(或非MaaS)转向早期的MaaS,还需要更多的洞察,这对于MaaS的可持续发展至关重要。基于此,我们在北京开展了一项声明偏好(SP)调查,采用一种新颖的实验方式,为受访者提供了比较场景,要求他们关注MaaS选项与提供的单峰模式之间的差异。此外,本文还建立了一个基于潜在类别的模型,整合了从比较SP实验中收集的旅行习惯和跨场景变量。根据估计结果,我们得到了两类。前者代表了熟悉MaaS和使用共享出行的受访者,后者代表了汽车爱好者。关于这两类的偏好,前一类的受访者可能会对所有MaaS选项产生更高的效用。也就是说,当他们选择私家车或出租车时,他们也倾向于在没有MaaS的情况下选择模式。相反,后一类的受访者可能对所有MaaS选项持否定态度。尽管如此,先前的公共交通(PT)模式选择正向影响选择包括PT在内的MaaS选项。此外,我们提出了向MaaS转移的指数来量化向MaaS转移的意愿。我们的研究结果表明,第1类受访者更有可能转向MaaS,而减少出行时间对转向MaaS没有很强的影响。据此,对MaaS的发展提出了一些见解和政策启示,包括推广策略、当前运输方式的变化以及MaaS的发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the impact of the Paris 2024 Olympic Games on bicycle lane utilization with electric bike-sharing data Evaluating the carbon emission impacts of shifting to ride-pooling: A user group perspective Is the mixed use city of short distances equally shorter for everybody? Evidence from the universe of Czech commuters Beyond direct flights: higher-order connectivity in China’s international air cargo network Optimal railway freight subsidy scheme for hinterland container transportation network considering carbon tax and shippers’ choice behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1