Bikeshare impacts on bus ridership: Unraveling the rail proximity effect

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2025.104373
Xinyu Liu , Jie Yu , Jing Zhao , Robert J. Schneider
{"title":"Bikeshare impacts on bus ridership: Unraveling the rail proximity effect","authors":"Xinyu Liu ,&nbsp;Jie Yu ,&nbsp;Jing Zhao ,&nbsp;Robert J. Schneider","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research investigates the causal effects of bikeshare on bus ridership, with a special focus on quantifying how rail transit influences this relationship. Drawing on data before and after the introduction of station-based bikeshare service in the City of Chicago, we estimated two sets of fixed-effects models. Initially, a general fixed-effects model was employed to study the influence of bikeshare service provision on ridership at both rail stations and bus stops. Subsequently, we used a fixed effects model with interaction terms to delve into the specific effects of bikeshare on bus stop ridership while effectively controlling for the proximity to rail stations. Besides, the heterogeneous effects of bikeshare on bus stop ridership under varied household income levels was studied. Our findings reveal that the introduction of bikeshare service is associated with a significant increase in rail ridership at the rail station level and a notable decrease in bus ridership at the stop level on weekdays and weekends/holidays. Moreover, we observe a higher substitution of bikeshare for bus trips at bus stops located near rail stations, indicating a manifest overlap between feeder bus services and bikeshare in these areas. The heterogeneity analysis further suggests the more pronounced negative impact of bikeshare provision on bus stop ridership in neighborhoods with high household income. These findings emphasize the importance of resource rebalance considering the interconnected relationships among rail, bus, and bikeshare services. Rather than evaluating bus and rail separately, agencies should assess the combined impact of bikeshare, as this approach will aid them in allocating limited transportation resources (e.g., rail, bus, and bikeshare) more effectively to communities and individuals with the greatest needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 104373"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research investigates the causal effects of bikeshare on bus ridership, with a special focus on quantifying how rail transit influences this relationship. Drawing on data before and after the introduction of station-based bikeshare service in the City of Chicago, we estimated two sets of fixed-effects models. Initially, a general fixed-effects model was employed to study the influence of bikeshare service provision on ridership at both rail stations and bus stops. Subsequently, we used a fixed effects model with interaction terms to delve into the specific effects of bikeshare on bus stop ridership while effectively controlling for the proximity to rail stations. Besides, the heterogeneous effects of bikeshare on bus stop ridership under varied household income levels was studied. Our findings reveal that the introduction of bikeshare service is associated with a significant increase in rail ridership at the rail station level and a notable decrease in bus ridership at the stop level on weekdays and weekends/holidays. Moreover, we observe a higher substitution of bikeshare for bus trips at bus stops located near rail stations, indicating a manifest overlap between feeder bus services and bikeshare in these areas. The heterogeneity analysis further suggests the more pronounced negative impact of bikeshare provision on bus stop ridership in neighborhoods with high household income. These findings emphasize the importance of resource rebalance considering the interconnected relationships among rail, bus, and bikeshare services. Rather than evaluating bus and rail separately, agencies should assess the combined impact of bikeshare, as this approach will aid them in allocating limited transportation resources (e.g., rail, bus, and bikeshare) more effectively to communities and individuals with the greatest needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共享单车对公交乘客的影响:揭示铁路邻近效应
本研究调查了共享单车对公交客流量的因果关系,特别关注于量化轨道交通如何影响这种关系。利用芝加哥市引入车站式共享单车服务前后的数据,我们估计了两组固定效应模型。首先,采用一般固定效应模型研究了在铁路车站和公交车站提供自行车服务对客流量的影响。在此基础上,采用固定效应模型,在有效控制公交车站距离的前提下,探讨了共享单车对公交车站客流量的具体影响。此外,还研究了不同家庭收入水平下共享单车对公交车站客流量的异质性影响。我们的研究结果表明,在工作日和周末/节假日,自行车共享服务的引入与火车站层面的铁路客流量显著增加和车站层面的公共汽车客流量显著减少有关。此外,我们观察到,在火车站附近的公共汽车站,自行车出行对公共汽车出行的替代率更高,这表明在这些地区,接驳巴士服务和自行车服务之间存在明显的重叠。异质性分析进一步表明,在高收入社区,共享单车对公交车站客流量的负面影响更为明显。这些发现强调了考虑到铁路、公共汽车和自行车共享服务之间的相互关系,资源再平衡的重要性。政府机构不应单独评估公共汽车和铁路,而应评估共享单车的综合影响,因为这种方法将帮助他们更有效地将有限的交通资源(例如,铁路、公共汽车和共享单车)分配给最需要的社区和个人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Penalties as prices? evaluating airline strategic responses to tarmac delay penalties in the US Modelling aggregate travel behaviour over time in the absence of panel data: methods and a case study from Colombia NeuralMetric: An accurate and efficient real-time safety metric for automated driving systems Designing rating-based mechanisms for dockless bike-sharing: Behavioral incentives and sustainable mobility Transshipment incidence, vessel-class composition, and carrier dominance: the footloose effect in container port throughput volatility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1