Xinyu Liu , Jie Yu , Jing Zhao , Robert J. Schneider
{"title":"Bikeshare impacts on bus ridership: Unraveling the rail proximity effect","authors":"Xinyu Liu , Jie Yu , Jing Zhao , Robert J. Schneider","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research investigates the causal effects of bikeshare on bus ridership, with a special focus on quantifying how rail transit influences this relationship. Drawing on data before and after the introduction of station-based bikeshare service in the City of Chicago, we estimated two sets of fixed-effects models. Initially, a general fixed-effects model was employed to study the influence of bikeshare service provision on ridership at both rail stations and bus stops. Subsequently, we used a fixed effects model with interaction terms to delve into the specific effects of bikeshare on bus stop ridership while effectively controlling for the proximity to rail stations. Besides, the heterogeneous effects of bikeshare on bus stop ridership under varied household income levels was studied. Our findings reveal that the introduction of bikeshare service is associated with a significant increase in rail ridership at the rail station level and a notable decrease in bus ridership at the stop level on weekdays and weekends/holidays. Moreover, we observe a higher substitution of bikeshare for bus trips at bus stops located near rail stations, indicating a manifest overlap between feeder bus services and bikeshare in these areas. The heterogeneity analysis further suggests the more pronounced negative impact of bikeshare provision on bus stop ridership in neighborhoods with high household income. These findings emphasize the importance of resource rebalance considering the interconnected relationships among rail, bus, and bikeshare services. Rather than evaluating bus and rail separately, agencies should assess the combined impact of bikeshare, as this approach will aid them in allocating limited transportation resources (e.g., rail, bus, and bikeshare) more effectively to communities and individuals with the greatest needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 104373"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research investigates the causal effects of bikeshare on bus ridership, with a special focus on quantifying how rail transit influences this relationship. Drawing on data before and after the introduction of station-based bikeshare service in the City of Chicago, we estimated two sets of fixed-effects models. Initially, a general fixed-effects model was employed to study the influence of bikeshare service provision on ridership at both rail stations and bus stops. Subsequently, we used a fixed effects model with interaction terms to delve into the specific effects of bikeshare on bus stop ridership while effectively controlling for the proximity to rail stations. Besides, the heterogeneous effects of bikeshare on bus stop ridership under varied household income levels was studied. Our findings reveal that the introduction of bikeshare service is associated with a significant increase in rail ridership at the rail station level and a notable decrease in bus ridership at the stop level on weekdays and weekends/holidays. Moreover, we observe a higher substitution of bikeshare for bus trips at bus stops located near rail stations, indicating a manifest overlap between feeder bus services and bikeshare in these areas. The heterogeneity analysis further suggests the more pronounced negative impact of bikeshare provision on bus stop ridership in neighborhoods with high household income. These findings emphasize the importance of resource rebalance considering the interconnected relationships among rail, bus, and bikeshare services. Rather than evaluating bus and rail separately, agencies should assess the combined impact of bikeshare, as this approach will aid them in allocating limited transportation resources (e.g., rail, bus, and bikeshare) more effectively to communities and individuals with the greatest needs.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions.
Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.