Switching behavior in the adoption of electric vehicle in China: Perspective of push–pull-mooring framework

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2024.104359
Jun Li , Ao Zhang , Chengyuan Wang , Shanyong Wang , Liang Liang
{"title":"Switching behavior in the adoption of electric vehicle in China: Perspective of push–pull-mooring framework","authors":"Jun Li ,&nbsp;Ao Zhang ,&nbsp;Chengyuan Wang ,&nbsp;Shanyong Wang ,&nbsp;Liang Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2024.104359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As environmental issues caused by the transportation sector become increasingly severe, incentivizing consumers to shift to electric vehicles (EVs) has become ever more significant. This research examines how environmental concern and moral obligation (push factors), perceived operating costs and environmental threats (pull factors), and perceived risk (mooring factors) within the push–pull-mooring paradigm influence customers’ willingness to switch to EVs. The results show that environmental concern and moral obligation draw consumers to EVs, while perceived operating costs and environmental threats discourage consumers from choosing internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). Perceived risk negatively affects consumers’ willingness to switch to EVs, diminishing the impact of both push and pull factors. These findings are critical for China in achieving its “dual carbon” goals. We propose policy recommendations and suggestions to further promote EV adoption in light of the research conclusions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 104359"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424004075","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As environmental issues caused by the transportation sector become increasingly severe, incentivizing consumers to shift to electric vehicles (EVs) has become ever more significant. This research examines how environmental concern and moral obligation (push factors), perceived operating costs and environmental threats (pull factors), and perceived risk (mooring factors) within the push–pull-mooring paradigm influence customers’ willingness to switch to EVs. The results show that environmental concern and moral obligation draw consumers to EVs, while perceived operating costs and environmental threats discourage consumers from choosing internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). Perceived risk negatively affects consumers’ willingness to switch to EVs, diminishing the impact of both push and pull factors. These findings are critical for China in achieving its “dual carbon” goals. We propose policy recommendations and suggestions to further promote EV adoption in light of the research conclusions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国电动汽车使用中的切换行为:推拉系泊框架的视角
随着交通运输行业造成的环境问题日益严重,激励消费者转向电动汽车(ev)变得越来越重要。本研究考察了在推拉系泊模式下,环境关注和道德义务(推动因素)、感知运营成本和环境威胁(拉动因素)以及感知风险(系泊因素)如何影响客户转向电动汽车的意愿。结果表明,环境问题和道德责任吸引了消费者选择电动汽车,而感知到的运营成本和环境威胁阻碍了消费者选择内燃机汽车。感知风险会对消费者转向电动汽车的意愿产生负面影响,从而削弱了推动因素和拉动因素的影响。这些发现对中国实现“双碳”目标至关重要。结合研究结论,提出进一步推动电动汽车普及的政策建议和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Modelling aggregate travel behaviour over time in the absence of panel data: methods and a case study from Colombia Assessing the impact of the Paris 2024 Olympic Games on bicycle lane utilization with electric bike-sharing data Evaluating the carbon emission impacts of shifting to ride-pooling: A user group perspective Is the mixed use city of short distances equally shorter for everybody? Evidence from the universe of Czech commuters Beyond direct flights: higher-order connectivity in China’s international air cargo network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1