The energy efficiency paradox in electric vehicle adoption: Estimating the internal discount rate and the influences of behavioural factors

IF 6.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2024.104367
Rajeev Ranjan Kumar , Alok Raj , J. Ajith Kumar
{"title":"The energy efficiency paradox in electric vehicle adoption: Estimating the internal discount rate and the influences of behavioural factors","authors":"Rajeev Ranjan Kumar ,&nbsp;Alok Raj ,&nbsp;J. Ajith Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2024.104367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The adoption of electric vehicles (EV) has increased significantly in countries such as China and Norway. Yet, it is still a concern in countries such as India, where the demand for EVs is lower than that for gasoline vehicles (GV), despite the EVs’ greater long-run operational cost-effectiveness. A plausible factor is the trade-off that consumers face in an EV vs. GV purchase between EVs’ near-term higher upfront costs and their long-term lower operational costs. We investigate this by estimating the internal discount rate, which captures consumers’ preference for immediate benefits over future gains. In doing so, we invoke the “energy efficiency paradox,” which refers to consumers’ reluctance to adopt an energy-efficient technology despite its long-run cost-effectiveness. We also study the roles played by consumer inattention, risk aversion, and subjective norm in low EV uptake. We design and conduct an experimental survey of over 600 Indian consumers, and using a combination of empirical estimation techniques, we arrive at multiple results. We find that the internal discount rate is nearly 60%, suggesting that consumers underestimate future benefits from EV usage too heavily. Our results also show that an increase in the perceived annual savings by US $1,370 is highly likely to increase consumer EV adoption likelihood by 6.8% and inattentive consumers are 10.4% less likely to adopt an EV as compared to attentive consumers. Our findings contribute to a nuanced understanding of why consumers hesitate to adopt the EV and generate insights that can have prolonged implications for practitioners and academia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 104367"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424004154","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adoption of electric vehicles (EV) has increased significantly in countries such as China and Norway. Yet, it is still a concern in countries such as India, where the demand for EVs is lower than that for gasoline vehicles (GV), despite the EVs’ greater long-run operational cost-effectiveness. A plausible factor is the trade-off that consumers face in an EV vs. GV purchase between EVs’ near-term higher upfront costs and their long-term lower operational costs. We investigate this by estimating the internal discount rate, which captures consumers’ preference for immediate benefits over future gains. In doing so, we invoke the “energy efficiency paradox,” which refers to consumers’ reluctance to adopt an energy-efficient technology despite its long-run cost-effectiveness. We also study the roles played by consumer inattention, risk aversion, and subjective norm in low EV uptake. We design and conduct an experimental survey of over 600 Indian consumers, and using a combination of empirical estimation techniques, we arrive at multiple results. We find that the internal discount rate is nearly 60%, suggesting that consumers underestimate future benefits from EV usage too heavily. Our results also show that an increase in the perceived annual savings by US $1,370 is highly likely to increase consumer EV adoption likelihood by 6.8% and inattentive consumers are 10.4% less likely to adopt an EV as compared to attentive consumers. Our findings contribute to a nuanced understanding of why consumers hesitate to adopt the EV and generate insights that can have prolonged implications for practitioners and academia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Equitable tradable parking permit scheme for shared nonpublic parking management How does differentiated subsidy adjustment influence new energy vehicle sales? Beyond project segments: An econometric evaluation of traffic network volume forecasting Exploring the potential adoption of Mobility-as-a-Service in Beijing: A spatial agent-based model Understanding ride-sourcing drivers' working patterns based on platform operations data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1