{"title":"The energy efficiency paradox in electric vehicle adoption: Estimating the internal discount rate and the influences of behavioural factors","authors":"Rajeev Ranjan Kumar , Alok Raj , J. Ajith Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2024.104367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The adoption of electric vehicles (EV) has increased significantly in countries such as China and Norway. Yet, it is still a concern in countries such as India, where the demand for EVs is lower than that for gasoline vehicles (GV), despite the EVs’ greater long-run operational cost-effectiveness. A plausible factor is the trade-off that consumers face in an EV vs. GV purchase between EVs’ near-term higher upfront costs and their long-term lower operational costs. We investigate this by estimating the internal discount rate, which captures consumers’ preference for immediate benefits over future gains. In doing so, we invoke the “energy efficiency paradox,” which refers to consumers’ reluctance to adopt an energy-efficient technology despite its long-run cost-effectiveness. We also study the roles played by consumer inattention, risk aversion, and subjective norm in low EV uptake. We design and conduct an experimental survey of over 600 Indian consumers, and using a combination of empirical estimation techniques, we arrive at multiple results. We find that the internal discount rate is nearly 60%, suggesting that consumers underestimate future benefits from EV usage too heavily. Our results also show that an increase in the perceived annual savings by US $1,370 is highly likely to increase consumer EV adoption likelihood by 6.8% and inattentive consumers are 10.4% less likely to adopt an EV as compared to attentive consumers. Our findings contribute to a nuanced understanding of why consumers hesitate to adopt the EV and generate insights that can have prolonged implications for practitioners and academia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 104367"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424004154","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The adoption of electric vehicles (EV) has increased significantly in countries such as China and Norway. Yet, it is still a concern in countries such as India, where the demand for EVs is lower than that for gasoline vehicles (GV), despite the EVs’ greater long-run operational cost-effectiveness. A plausible factor is the trade-off that consumers face in an EV vs. GV purchase between EVs’ near-term higher upfront costs and their long-term lower operational costs. We investigate this by estimating the internal discount rate, which captures consumers’ preference for immediate benefits over future gains. In doing so, we invoke the “energy efficiency paradox,” which refers to consumers’ reluctance to adopt an energy-efficient technology despite its long-run cost-effectiveness. We also study the roles played by consumer inattention, risk aversion, and subjective norm in low EV uptake. We design and conduct an experimental survey of over 600 Indian consumers, and using a combination of empirical estimation techniques, we arrive at multiple results. We find that the internal discount rate is nearly 60%, suggesting that consumers underestimate future benefits from EV usage too heavily. Our results also show that an increase in the perceived annual savings by US $1,370 is highly likely to increase consumer EV adoption likelihood by 6.8% and inattentive consumers are 10.4% less likely to adopt an EV as compared to attentive consumers. Our findings contribute to a nuanced understanding of why consumers hesitate to adopt the EV and generate insights that can have prolonged implications for practitioners and academia.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions.
Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.