The energy efficiency paradox in electric vehicle adoption: Estimating the internal discount rate and the influences of behavioural factors

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2024.104367
Rajeev Ranjan Kumar , Alok Raj , J. Ajith Kumar
{"title":"The energy efficiency paradox in electric vehicle adoption: Estimating the internal discount rate and the influences of behavioural factors","authors":"Rajeev Ranjan Kumar ,&nbsp;Alok Raj ,&nbsp;J. Ajith Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2024.104367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The adoption of electric vehicles (EV) has increased significantly in countries such as China and Norway. Yet, it is still a concern in countries such as India, where the demand for EVs is lower than that for gasoline vehicles (GV), despite the EVs’ greater long-run operational cost-effectiveness. A plausible factor is the trade-off that consumers face in an EV vs. GV purchase between EVs’ near-term higher upfront costs and their long-term lower operational costs. We investigate this by estimating the internal discount rate, which captures consumers’ preference for immediate benefits over future gains. In doing so, we invoke the “energy efficiency paradox,” which refers to consumers’ reluctance to adopt an energy-efficient technology despite its long-run cost-effectiveness. We also study the roles played by consumer inattention, risk aversion, and subjective norm in low EV uptake. We design and conduct an experimental survey of over 600 Indian consumers, and using a combination of empirical estimation techniques, we arrive at multiple results. We find that the internal discount rate is nearly 60%, suggesting that consumers underestimate future benefits from EV usage too heavily. Our results also show that an increase in the perceived annual savings by US $1,370 is highly likely to increase consumer EV adoption likelihood by 6.8% and inattentive consumers are 10.4% less likely to adopt an EV as compared to attentive consumers. Our findings contribute to a nuanced understanding of why consumers hesitate to adopt the EV and generate insights that can have prolonged implications for practitioners and academia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 104367"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424004154","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adoption of electric vehicles (EV) has increased significantly in countries such as China and Norway. Yet, it is still a concern in countries such as India, where the demand for EVs is lower than that for gasoline vehicles (GV), despite the EVs’ greater long-run operational cost-effectiveness. A plausible factor is the trade-off that consumers face in an EV vs. GV purchase between EVs’ near-term higher upfront costs and their long-term lower operational costs. We investigate this by estimating the internal discount rate, which captures consumers’ preference for immediate benefits over future gains. In doing so, we invoke the “energy efficiency paradox,” which refers to consumers’ reluctance to adopt an energy-efficient technology despite its long-run cost-effectiveness. We also study the roles played by consumer inattention, risk aversion, and subjective norm in low EV uptake. We design and conduct an experimental survey of over 600 Indian consumers, and using a combination of empirical estimation techniques, we arrive at multiple results. We find that the internal discount rate is nearly 60%, suggesting that consumers underestimate future benefits from EV usage too heavily. Our results also show that an increase in the perceived annual savings by US $1,370 is highly likely to increase consumer EV adoption likelihood by 6.8% and inattentive consumers are 10.4% less likely to adopt an EV as compared to attentive consumers. Our findings contribute to a nuanced understanding of why consumers hesitate to adopt the EV and generate insights that can have prolonged implications for practitioners and academia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电动汽车使用中的能效悖论:内部折现率估算及行为因素的影响
在中国和挪威等国家,电动汽车(EV)的采用大幅增加。然而,在印度等国家,尽管电动汽车的长期运营成本效益更高,但对电动汽车的需求低于汽油车(GV),这仍然是一个令人担忧的问题。一个貌似合理的因素是,消费者在购买电动汽车和GV时,面临着短期较高的前期成本和长期较低的运营成本之间的权衡。我们通过估计内部贴现率来调查这一点,内部贴现率反映了消费者对眼前利益的偏好,而不是未来的收益。在此过程中,我们援引了“能源效率悖论”,即消费者不愿意采用节能技术,尽管其长期成本效益。我们还研究了消费者注意力不集中、风险厌恶和主观规范在低电动汽车摄取中的作用。我们设计并开展了一项针对600多名印度消费者的实验性调查,并结合了经验估计技术,得出了多种结果。我们发现,内部贴现率接近60%,这表明消费者过于低估了使用电动汽车的未来好处。我们的研究结果还表明,每年节省1370美元很有可能使消费者采用电动汽车的可能性提高6.8%,而不专心的消费者采用电动汽车的可能性比专心的消费者低10.4%。我们的研究结果有助于细致入微地理解消费者对采用电动汽车犹豫不决的原因,并产生对从业者和学术界具有长期影响的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Autonomous vehicles in the public eye: A global social media analysis for smarter policies How are objective and perceived walkability associated with the health of older adults through walking behavior? Dynamic effect of subway expansion on the spatial and temporal distribution of road congestion The Relative Index of Metropolisation of the Territory: Quantifying spatial reorganisation driven by land-based transport Would you feel good sitting there? Psychological stress and social control in public transportation priority seating
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1