Why are fairness concerns so important? Lessons from a last-mile transportation system

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2024.104361
Yiwei Chen , Hai Wang
{"title":"Why are fairness concerns so important? Lessons from a last-mile transportation system","authors":"Yiwei Chen ,&nbsp;Hai Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2024.104361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Last-Mile Problem refers to the provision of travel service for passengers from the nearest public transportation node to the final destination. The Last-Mile Transportation System (LMTS), which has recently emerged, provides on-demand last-mile transportation service for passengers. We consider an LMTS that consists of two types of passengers, regular-type passengers and special-type passengers (e.g., seniors, disabled people). The valuation of the last-mile service for special-type passengers is statistically higher than the one for regular-type passengers. Passengers incur disutility from waiting for the last-mile service. In this paper, we explore two fairness constraints on special-type passengers: (1) the fare for special-type passengers is restricted to be no higher than a given fraction of the fare for regular-type passengers; (2) special-type passengers cannot be served after regular-type passengers. We aim at understanding the role of these two fairness constraints on the LMTS operator’s pricing and service priority policies, with the objective of maximizing either profit or social welfare. Our theoretical analysis and numerical experiments using real public transport data show that if passenger waiting disutility is negatively correlated with the last-mile service valuation, i.e., regular-type passengers are more sensitive to waiting time, then the LMTS operator always has incentive to charge special-type passengers more than regular-type passengers, and serve regular-type passengers first. This entails the necessity of enforcing the two fairness constraints. In addition, even if passenger waiting disutility is positively correlated with the last-mile service valuation, i.e., special-type passengers are more sensitive to waiting time, the two fairness constraints are still necessary under some market environments. These findings demonstrate the importance of fairness concerns in on-demand transportation systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 104361"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424004099","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Last-Mile Problem refers to the provision of travel service for passengers from the nearest public transportation node to the final destination. The Last-Mile Transportation System (LMTS), which has recently emerged, provides on-demand last-mile transportation service for passengers. We consider an LMTS that consists of two types of passengers, regular-type passengers and special-type passengers (e.g., seniors, disabled people). The valuation of the last-mile service for special-type passengers is statistically higher than the one for regular-type passengers. Passengers incur disutility from waiting for the last-mile service. In this paper, we explore two fairness constraints on special-type passengers: (1) the fare for special-type passengers is restricted to be no higher than a given fraction of the fare for regular-type passengers; (2) special-type passengers cannot be served after regular-type passengers. We aim at understanding the role of these two fairness constraints on the LMTS operator’s pricing and service priority policies, with the objective of maximizing either profit or social welfare. Our theoretical analysis and numerical experiments using real public transport data show that if passenger waiting disutility is negatively correlated with the last-mile service valuation, i.e., regular-type passengers are more sensitive to waiting time, then the LMTS operator always has incentive to charge special-type passengers more than regular-type passengers, and serve regular-type passengers first. This entails the necessity of enforcing the two fairness constraints. In addition, even if passenger waiting disutility is positively correlated with the last-mile service valuation, i.e., special-type passengers are more sensitive to waiting time, the two fairness constraints are still necessary under some market environments. These findings demonstrate the importance of fairness concerns in on-demand transportation systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么公平问题如此重要?最后一英里交通系统的经验教训
最后一英里问题是指为乘客提供从最近的公共交通节点到最终目的地的出行服务。最近出现的“最后一英里运输系统”(LMTS),为乘客提供按需的最后一英里运输服务。我们考虑一个由两类乘客组成的LMTS,普通乘客和特殊乘客(如老年人、残疾人)。对特殊类型旅客的最后一公里服务的评价在统计上高于普通类型旅客。乘客因等待最后一英里的服务而产生负效用。本文探讨了对特殊旅客的两种公平性约束:(1)特殊旅客票价不得高于普通旅客票价的一定比例;(2)特殊旅客不能在普通旅客之后服务。我们的目标是理解这两个公平约束在LMTS运营商定价和服务优先政策中的作用,以实现利润最大化或社会福利最大化。本文的理论分析和基于真实公共交通数据的数值实验表明,如果乘客等待负效用与最后一英里服务价值呈负相关,即普通类型乘客对等待时间更为敏感,则LMTS运营商总是有动机向特殊类型乘客收取比普通类型乘客更高的费用,并优先为普通类型乘客提供服务。这就需要强制执行两个公平约束。此外,即使乘客候车负效用与最后一英里服务价值呈正相关,即特殊类型乘客对候车时间更为敏感,但在某些市场环境下,这两种公平约束仍然是必要的。这些发现证明了公平问题在按需运输系统中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the impact of the Paris 2024 Olympic Games on bicycle lane utilization with electric bike-sharing data Evaluating the carbon emission impacts of shifting to ride-pooling: A user group perspective Is the mixed use city of short distances equally shorter for everybody? Evidence from the universe of Czech commuters Beyond direct flights: higher-order connectivity in China’s international air cargo network Optimal railway freight subsidy scheme for hinterland container transportation network considering carbon tax and shippers’ choice behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1