Capacity evaluation of ERTMS/ETCS HTD and moving block

IF 2.7 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jrtpm.2025.100506
Daniel Knutsen , Nils O.E. Olsson , Jiali Fu , Tomas Rosberg
{"title":"Capacity evaluation of ERTMS/ETCS HTD and moving block","authors":"Daniel Knutsen ,&nbsp;Nils O.E. Olsson ,&nbsp;Jiali Fu ,&nbsp;Tomas Rosberg","doi":"10.1016/j.jrtpm.2025.100506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper compares the capacity effect of different implementations of ERTMS/ETCS (European Rail Traffic Management System/The European Train Control System): Hybrid Train Detection (HTD) and moving block. This is done both on a conceptual level by looking at a scenario involving two trains, and for a simulated network. The effects are studied by modelling HTD and moving block in the simulation tool RailSys, looking at the performance indicators related to capacity: headway, capacity utilisation, and punctuality. The model uses existing infrastructure and a complete timetable. The results of the scenario with two trains show that similar results on headway can be achieved with HTD compared to moving block This is true even with relatively long virtual blocks of 500 m. The results from the simulated network show that various shares of trains with train integrity, as well as moving block, have a minor effect on the performance indicator punctuality. Moving block gives some improvements on capacity utilisation compared to HTD. However, by implementing shorter virtual blocks at sections of lower speed, it is possible to achieve results on capacity utilisation like that engendered by moving block.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100506"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210970625000034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper compares the capacity effect of different implementations of ERTMS/ETCS (European Rail Traffic Management System/The European Train Control System): Hybrid Train Detection (HTD) and moving block. This is done both on a conceptual level by looking at a scenario involving two trains, and for a simulated network. The effects are studied by modelling HTD and moving block in the simulation tool RailSys, looking at the performance indicators related to capacity: headway, capacity utilisation, and punctuality. The model uses existing infrastructure and a complete timetable. The results of the scenario with two trains show that similar results on headway can be achieved with HTD compared to moving block This is true even with relatively long virtual blocks of 500 m. The results from the simulated network show that various shares of trains with train integrity, as well as moving block, have a minor effect on the performance indicator punctuality. Moving block gives some improvements on capacity utilisation compared to HTD. However, by implementing shorter virtual blocks at sections of lower speed, it is possible to achieve results on capacity utilisation like that engendered by moving block.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ERTMS/ETCS HTD和移动块的容量评估
本文比较了ERTMS/ETCS(欧洲轨道交通管理系统/欧洲列车控制系统)、混合列车检测(HTD)和移动阻塞的不同实施方式的容量效应。这是在概念层面上通过查看涉及两列火车的场景和模拟网络来完成的。通过在仿真工具RailSys中模拟HTD和移动块来研究其影响,并查看与容量相关的性能指标:车头时距、容量利用率和准点率。该模型使用现有的基础设施和完整的时间表。两列火车的场景结果表明,与移动街区相比,HTD可以获得相似的车头时距结果,即使是相对较长的500米虚拟街区也是如此。仿真结果表明,列车完整性的不同份额以及运行阻塞对性能指标正点率的影响较小。与HTD相比,移动块在容量利用率方面有一些改进。然而,通过在较低速度的部分实现较短的虚拟块,可以实现像移动块那样的容量利用结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Train delay prediction for high-speed railway based on the SCM hybrid method Rolling stock management and railway efficiency: Evidence from a line-level analysis of regional rail services in France Integrated optimization of train stop planning, train timetabling, and maintenance planning for railway container system under passenger transport mode Editorial Board Reliability evaluation of rail freight transport processes — An agent-based approach combining microscopic rail simulation and freight network logistics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1