How do differences in airline passengers’ satisfaction with connectivity modes affect last-mile travel choices? A SALC modeling based on RRM

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2025.104374
JiangBo Yu , JianCheng Weng , Tian Wang , PengFei Lin , YuXing Sun , JiaoLong Chai
{"title":"How do differences in airline passengers’ satisfaction with connectivity modes affect last-mile travel choices? A SALC modeling based on RRM","authors":"JiangBo Yu ,&nbsp;JianCheng Weng ,&nbsp;Tian Wang ,&nbsp;PengFei Lin ,&nbsp;YuXing Sun ,&nbsp;JiaoLong Chai","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Airport connectivity travel is the last mile of the air travel process. The characteristics of different connectivity travel modes are key factors influencing air passengers’ choices. However, the arriving passengers’ subjective expectations and satisfaction levels differ significantly across these modes. Therefore, considering differences in satisfaction of passengers with connectivity services, the study conducts a questionnaire survey at Beijing Capital International Airport and Beijing Daxing International Airport, and 542 valid questionnaires are obtained. Arriving passengers’ satisfaction with different modes was measured based on the structural equation model. The latent profile analysis was utilized to classify into different categories considering their satisfaction levels. A new model, the scale-adjusted latent class model based on Random Regret Minimization (RRM), is established, using passengers’ satisfaction categories as a scale parameter to analyze the impact of satisfaction differences on connectivity travel mode choices. The results show that there are two primary satisfaction categories, one group has high satisfaction with metro (HSM) and the other has high satisfaction with car-hailing (HSC). Passengers’ preference heterogeneity is revealed and can be divided into three classes, avoiding-transfer (ATC), cost-sensitive (CSC), and time-sensitive (TSC). Waiting time, comfort degree, travel out-of-pocket expenses (OPE), and transfer convenience significantly influence mode choice behavior of TSC. The CSC would be more concerned about the OPE. ATC emphasizes the transfer convenience. Strategies to enhance satisfaction with connectivity services are suggested, aiming to optimize the last mile of intercity travel and promote efficient urban transportation operations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 104374"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Airport connectivity travel is the last mile of the air travel process. The characteristics of different connectivity travel modes are key factors influencing air passengers’ choices. However, the arriving passengers’ subjective expectations and satisfaction levels differ significantly across these modes. Therefore, considering differences in satisfaction of passengers with connectivity services, the study conducts a questionnaire survey at Beijing Capital International Airport and Beijing Daxing International Airport, and 542 valid questionnaires are obtained. Arriving passengers’ satisfaction with different modes was measured based on the structural equation model. The latent profile analysis was utilized to classify into different categories considering their satisfaction levels. A new model, the scale-adjusted latent class model based on Random Regret Minimization (RRM), is established, using passengers’ satisfaction categories as a scale parameter to analyze the impact of satisfaction differences on connectivity travel mode choices. The results show that there are two primary satisfaction categories, one group has high satisfaction with metro (HSM) and the other has high satisfaction with car-hailing (HSC). Passengers’ preference heterogeneity is revealed and can be divided into three classes, avoiding-transfer (ATC), cost-sensitive (CSC), and time-sensitive (TSC). Waiting time, comfort degree, travel out-of-pocket expenses (OPE), and transfer convenience significantly influence mode choice behavior of TSC. The CSC would be more concerned about the OPE. ATC emphasizes the transfer convenience. Strategies to enhance satisfaction with connectivity services are suggested, aiming to optimize the last mile of intercity travel and promote efficient urban transportation operations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
航空公司乘客对连接方式的满意度差异如何影响最后一英里的旅行选择?基于RRM的SALC建模
机场连接旅行是航空旅行过程的最后一英里。不同互联出行方式的特点是影响航空旅客出行选择的关键因素。然而,到达旅客的主观期望和满意度在这些模式之间存在显著差异。因此,考虑到旅客对互联互通服务满意度的差异,本研究在北京首都国际机场和北京大兴国际机场进行了问卷调查,共获得有效问卷542份。基于结构方程模型对不同模式下的到达旅客满意度进行了测量。使用潜在剖面分析,根据他们的满意度将其分为不同的类别。建立了基于随机遗憾最小化(RRM)的尺度调整潜在类模型,以乘客满意度类别作为尺度参数,分析满意度差异对连通性出行方式选择的影响。结果表明,出行满意度主要分为两类,一类是对地铁(HSM)的高满意度,另一类是对网约车(HSC)的高满意度。揭示了乘客偏好的异质性,并将其划分为避免换乘(ATC)、成本敏感型(CSC)和时间敏感型(TSC)三类。候车时间、舒适度、出行自付费用和换乘便利性显著影响TSC的模式选择行为。CSC会更关心OPE。ATC强调换乘的便利性。提出了提高互联互通服务满意度的策略,旨在优化城际交通的最后一公里,促进城市交通的高效运行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Modelling aggregate travel behaviour over time in the absence of panel data: methods and a case study from Colombia Assessing the impact of the Paris 2024 Olympic Games on bicycle lane utilization with electric bike-sharing data Evaluating the carbon emission impacts of shifting to ride-pooling: A user group perspective Is the mixed use city of short distances equally shorter for everybody? Evidence from the universe of Czech commuters Beyond direct flights: higher-order connectivity in China’s international air cargo network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1