How do differences in airline passengers’ satisfaction with connectivity modes affect last-mile travel choices? A SALC modeling based on RRM

IF 6.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2025.104374
JiangBo Yu , JianCheng Weng , Tian Wang , PengFei Lin , YuXing Sun , JiaoLong Chai
{"title":"How do differences in airline passengers’ satisfaction with connectivity modes affect last-mile travel choices? A SALC modeling based on RRM","authors":"JiangBo Yu ,&nbsp;JianCheng Weng ,&nbsp;Tian Wang ,&nbsp;PengFei Lin ,&nbsp;YuXing Sun ,&nbsp;JiaoLong Chai","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Airport connectivity travel is the last mile of the air travel process. The characteristics of different connectivity travel modes are key factors influencing air passengers’ choices. However, the arriving passengers’ subjective expectations and satisfaction levels differ significantly across these modes. Therefore, considering differences in satisfaction of passengers with connectivity services, the study conducts a questionnaire survey at Beijing Capital International Airport and Beijing Daxing International Airport, and 542 valid questionnaires are obtained. Arriving passengers’ satisfaction with different modes was measured based on the structural equation model. The latent profile analysis was utilized to classify into different categories considering their satisfaction levels. A new model, the scale-adjusted latent class model based on Random Regret Minimization (RRM), is established, using passengers’ satisfaction categories as a scale parameter to analyze the impact of satisfaction differences on connectivity travel mode choices. The results show that there are two primary satisfaction categories, one group has high satisfaction with metro (HSM) and the other has high satisfaction with car-hailing (HSC). Passengers’ preference heterogeneity is revealed and can be divided into three classes, avoiding-transfer (ATC), cost-sensitive (CSC), and time-sensitive (TSC). Waiting time, comfort degree, travel out-of-pocket expenses (OPE), and transfer convenience significantly influence mode choice behavior of TSC. The CSC would be more concerned about the OPE. ATC emphasizes the transfer convenience. Strategies to enhance satisfaction with connectivity services are suggested, aiming to optimize the last mile of intercity travel and promote efficient urban transportation operations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 104374"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Airport connectivity travel is the last mile of the air travel process. The characteristics of different connectivity travel modes are key factors influencing air passengers’ choices. However, the arriving passengers’ subjective expectations and satisfaction levels differ significantly across these modes. Therefore, considering differences in satisfaction of passengers with connectivity services, the study conducts a questionnaire survey at Beijing Capital International Airport and Beijing Daxing International Airport, and 542 valid questionnaires are obtained. Arriving passengers’ satisfaction with different modes was measured based on the structural equation model. The latent profile analysis was utilized to classify into different categories considering their satisfaction levels. A new model, the scale-adjusted latent class model based on Random Regret Minimization (RRM), is established, using passengers’ satisfaction categories as a scale parameter to analyze the impact of satisfaction differences on connectivity travel mode choices. The results show that there are two primary satisfaction categories, one group has high satisfaction with metro (HSM) and the other has high satisfaction with car-hailing (HSC). Passengers’ preference heterogeneity is revealed and can be divided into three classes, avoiding-transfer (ATC), cost-sensitive (CSC), and time-sensitive (TSC). Waiting time, comfort degree, travel out-of-pocket expenses (OPE), and transfer convenience significantly influence mode choice behavior of TSC. The CSC would be more concerned about the OPE. ATC emphasizes the transfer convenience. Strategies to enhance satisfaction with connectivity services are suggested, aiming to optimize the last mile of intercity travel and promote efficient urban transportation operations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
A multi-objective model for fair location of stations and geofence parking area to address disorderly parking in free-floating micromobility systems Home delivery vs. out-of-home delivery: Syncretic value-based strategies for urban last-mile e-commerce logistics Pricing parking for fairness — A simulation study based on an empirically calibrated model of parking behavior The relationship between individual employment probabilities and accessibility to matching jobs: A study of the Netherlands Exploring the relationship between perceived bikeability and gender-inclusive micromobility usage: A study across 53 French cities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1