Does AI adoption redefine financial reporting accuracy, auditing efficiency, and information asymmetry? An integrated model of TOE-TAM-RDT and big data governance

IF 5.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in human behavior reports Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100572
Saeed Awadh Bin-Nashwan , Jackie Zhanbiao Li , HaiChang Jiang , Anas Rasheed Bajary , Muhammad M. Ma'aji
{"title":"Does AI adoption redefine financial reporting accuracy, auditing efficiency, and information asymmetry? An integrated model of TOE-TAM-RDT and big data governance","authors":"Saeed Awadh Bin-Nashwan ,&nbsp;Jackie Zhanbiao Li ,&nbsp;HaiChang Jiang ,&nbsp;Anas Rasheed Bajary ,&nbsp;Muhammad M. Ma'aji","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accounting and auditing firms (AAFs) are experiencing a paradigm shift with the integration of artificial intelligence (AI), which has the potential to revolutionise important areas like fostering financial reporting accuracy, auditing efficiency, and diminishing information asymmetry. Yet, the effectiveness of AI adoption in achieving this goal is not guaranteed. Hence, this study aims to empirically explore what shapes AI adoption among AAFs, and what its potential role is in financial reporting accuracy, auditing efficiency, and information asymmetry. By applying a validated model of TOE-TAM-RDT and analysing using PLS-SEM, we found that AI adoption was shaped by competitive pressure, vendor ecosystem, top management support, relative advantage, AI readiness, and innovation climate. The adoption of AI-driven systems among AAFs exerted a positive impact on financial reporting accuracy, and auditing efficiency, while a negative impact on information asymmetry. Results further reveal a significant moderating effect of big data governance, demonstrating that proper management, quality, and ethical use of data within AAFs can amplify AI adoption benefits, boosting financial reporting accuracy, auditing efficiency, and mitigating information asymmetries between AAFs and stakeholders. These outcomes not only advance scholarly conversations on AI adoption in the financial and accounting landscape but also deliver actionable strategies for stakeholders to maximise AAFs’ benefits from this emerging revolutionary technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100572"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824002057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accounting and auditing firms (AAFs) are experiencing a paradigm shift with the integration of artificial intelligence (AI), which has the potential to revolutionise important areas like fostering financial reporting accuracy, auditing efficiency, and diminishing information asymmetry. Yet, the effectiveness of AI adoption in achieving this goal is not guaranteed. Hence, this study aims to empirically explore what shapes AI adoption among AAFs, and what its potential role is in financial reporting accuracy, auditing efficiency, and information asymmetry. By applying a validated model of TOE-TAM-RDT and analysing using PLS-SEM, we found that AI adoption was shaped by competitive pressure, vendor ecosystem, top management support, relative advantage, AI readiness, and innovation climate. The adoption of AI-driven systems among AAFs exerted a positive impact on financial reporting accuracy, and auditing efficiency, while a negative impact on information asymmetry. Results further reveal a significant moderating effect of big data governance, demonstrating that proper management, quality, and ethical use of data within AAFs can amplify AI adoption benefits, boosting financial reporting accuracy, auditing efficiency, and mitigating information asymmetries between AAFs and stakeholders. These outcomes not only advance scholarly conversations on AI adoption in the financial and accounting landscape but also deliver actionable strategies for stakeholders to maximise AAFs’ benefits from this emerging revolutionary technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能的采用是否重新定义了财务报告的准确性、审计效率和信息不对称?TOE-TAM-RDT与大数据治理一体化模式
随着人工智能(AI)的整合,会计和审计公司(AAFs)正在经历范式转变,人工智能有可能彻底改变重要领域,如提高财务报告准确性、审计效率和减少信息不对称。然而,人工智能在实现这一目标方面的有效性并没有得到保证。因此,本研究旨在通过实证探讨是什么影响了aaf采用人工智能,以及它在财务报告准确性、审计效率和信息不对称方面的潜在作用。通过应用经过验证的TOE-TAM-RDT模型并使用PLS-SEM进行分析,我们发现人工智能的采用受到竞争压力、供应商生态系统、高层管理支持、相对优势、人工智能准备程度和创新环境的影响。会计师事务所采用人工智能驱动系统对财务报告准确性和审计效率产生积极影响,对信息不对称产生消极影响。研究结果进一步揭示了大数据治理的显著调节作用,表明AAFs内部数据的适当管理、质量和道德使用可以放大人工智能采用的好处,提高财务报告的准确性、审计效率,并减轻AAFs与利益相关者之间的信息不对称。这些成果不仅推动了人工智能在金融和会计领域应用的学术对话,还为利益相关者提供了可操作的战略,以最大限度地从这一新兴的革命性技术中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can't look away – The effects of social media cues signaling social evaluation on the attention allocation of socially anxious individuals The relationship between social support and social negativity on social media for virtual socializing and college students’ anxiety levels during the COVID-19 pandemic Reduce your social media use and be mindful for a better mental health: An experimental intervention study from Germany Reading between the lines: LLMs match or exceed human empathic accuracy using text alone Troubled water: Enhancing flood preparedness with eXtended reality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1