Does digital grabbing boost affectivity in less empathic users? An interactive approach to affective laterality: Empathy, hand dominance, and action-context shape pleasantness experience

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in human behavior reports Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100568
Sergio C. Torres
{"title":"Does digital grabbing boost affectivity in less empathic users? An interactive approach to affective laterality: Empathy, hand dominance, and action-context shape pleasantness experience","authors":"Sergio C. Torres","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the interplay between dispositional empathy and emotional processing during embodied digital interactions. It builds upon the Spatial Affective Interaction (SAI) framework, which integrates neurobehavioral and cognitive perspectives on affective laterality, affective spatialization, and hand-proximity effects. The research particularly focuses on how lateralized manual interactions with emotional images (“emotional grabbing”) affect users’ pleasantness experiences. A sample of 240 right-handed participants used either their dominant right hand or non-dominant left hand to engage with 40 emotional images (20 pleasant and 20 unpleasant) using ipsilateral (same hand-side) or contralateral (opposite hand-side) interactions in a touchscreen environment. Key findings reveal asymmetries in pleasantness experiences that depend on hand dominance, ipsilateral interactions, and empathy levels. Specifically, participants reporting lower empathy associated increased pleasantness after using the dominant right hand to interact with right-positioned pleasant images. Conversely, interactions with left-positioned unpleasant images using the non-dominant left hand were associated with a heightened unpleasantness among low-empathy participants, with the opposite pattern observed in high-empathy individuals. These findings suggest that “emotional grabbing” may enhance sensitivity to emotional content in less empathic individuals, possibly by compensating an impaired activation of the action-observation network (AON), which integrates sensorimotor and empathy processes. The study underscores the relevance of considering hand dominance, emotional valence, and empathy in the future design of embodied digital interactions, to enhance emotional experiences of individuals with explicit empathy deficits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100568"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245195882400201X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the interplay between dispositional empathy and emotional processing during embodied digital interactions. It builds upon the Spatial Affective Interaction (SAI) framework, which integrates neurobehavioral and cognitive perspectives on affective laterality, affective spatialization, and hand-proximity effects. The research particularly focuses on how lateralized manual interactions with emotional images (“emotional grabbing”) affect users’ pleasantness experiences. A sample of 240 right-handed participants used either their dominant right hand or non-dominant left hand to engage with 40 emotional images (20 pleasant and 20 unpleasant) using ipsilateral (same hand-side) or contralateral (opposite hand-side) interactions in a touchscreen environment. Key findings reveal asymmetries in pleasantness experiences that depend on hand dominance, ipsilateral interactions, and empathy levels. Specifically, participants reporting lower empathy associated increased pleasantness after using the dominant right hand to interact with right-positioned pleasant images. Conversely, interactions with left-positioned unpleasant images using the non-dominant left hand were associated with a heightened unpleasantness among low-empathy participants, with the opposite pattern observed in high-empathy individuals. These findings suggest that “emotional grabbing” may enhance sensitivity to emotional content in less empathic individuals, possibly by compensating an impaired activation of the action-observation network (AON), which integrates sensorimotor and empathy processes. The study underscores the relevance of considering hand dominance, emotional valence, and empathy in the future design of embodied digital interactions, to enhance emotional experiences of individuals with explicit empathy deficits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Utilizing VR technology to explore the moral courage process and bystander behaviors: An experimental trial Toward the Language MOOC (LMOOC’s) low dropout rate: The control-value theory of persistency in LMOOC (CVTPLMOOC) Inclusive digital platforms: Designing for and with users with mild intellectual disabilities or low literacy skills Master your practice! A quantitative analysis of Device and system handling training to enable competent interactions with intelligent voice assistants Response-efficacy messages produce stronger passwords than self-efficacy messages … for now: A longitudinal experimental study of the efficacy of coping message types on password creation behaviour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1