Mapping the multidimensional trend of generative AI: A bibliometric analysis and qualitative thematic review

IF 5.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in human behavior reports Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100576
Dragoș M. Obreja , Răzvan Rughiniș , Daniel Rosner
{"title":"Mapping the multidimensional trend of generative AI: A bibliometric analysis and qualitative thematic review","authors":"Dragoș M. Obreja ,&nbsp;Răzvan Rughiniș ,&nbsp;Daniel Rosner","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Generative artificial intelligence (AI) represents an increasingly popular topic that is visible even in most research areas within the social sciences and humanities fields. However, little attention has been paid to the knowledge dimensions reflecting the potential macro-social implications of generative technologies. This study utilizes a two-fold methodology, consisting of a bibliometric analysis of articles published in the last decade (N = 484) and a subsequent qualitative thematic review of the most influential articles in each research area (N = 246). The objective is to investigate the main conceptual dimensions associated with generative AI in the social sciences. Applying a thematic analysis framework, we notice that the most popular dimensions are technological, ethical, and social. These dimensions primarily focus on investigating the implications of the generative use of AI on employees in professional sectors as well as on students and teachers in the educational environment. Moreover, the political dimension reflects macro-social consequences on governance and legal components related to ensuring social protection for professions that risk becoming obsolete due to the widespread adoption of ChatGPT-type technologies. Overall, our research emphasizes concrete scholarly tensions through which generative AI-based technologies are predominantly encouraged in the educational and organizational sectors, but the potential risks associated with copyright infringement and job loss might constitute important drivers of social change. We also notice that a Foucauldian power/knowledge framework would prove useful in understanding the underdiscussed effects of generative AI on the societal/macro level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100576"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824002094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) represents an increasingly popular topic that is visible even in most research areas within the social sciences and humanities fields. However, little attention has been paid to the knowledge dimensions reflecting the potential macro-social implications of generative technologies. This study utilizes a two-fold methodology, consisting of a bibliometric analysis of articles published in the last decade (N = 484) and a subsequent qualitative thematic review of the most influential articles in each research area (N = 246). The objective is to investigate the main conceptual dimensions associated with generative AI in the social sciences. Applying a thematic analysis framework, we notice that the most popular dimensions are technological, ethical, and social. These dimensions primarily focus on investigating the implications of the generative use of AI on employees in professional sectors as well as on students and teachers in the educational environment. Moreover, the political dimension reflects macro-social consequences on governance and legal components related to ensuring social protection for professions that risk becoming obsolete due to the widespread adoption of ChatGPT-type technologies. Overall, our research emphasizes concrete scholarly tensions through which generative AI-based technologies are predominantly encouraged in the educational and organizational sectors, but the potential risks associated with copyright infringement and job loss might constitute important drivers of social change. We also notice that a Foucauldian power/knowledge framework would prove useful in understanding the underdiscussed effects of generative AI on the societal/macro level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制生成式人工智能的多维趋势:文献计量分析和定性专题回顾
生成式人工智能(AI)是一个越来越受欢迎的话题,甚至在社会科学和人文科学领域的大多数研究领域都可以看到。然而,很少有人关注反映生成技术潜在宏观社会影响的知识维度。本研究采用双重方法,包括对过去十年发表的文章进行文献计量分析(N = 484),以及随后对每个研究领域最具影响力的文章进行定性专题审查(N = 246)。目的是研究与社会科学中生成式人工智能相关的主要概念维度。应用主题分析框架,我们注意到最受欢迎的维度是技术、道德和社会。这些维度主要侧重于调查人工智能对专业部门员工以及教育环境中学生和教师的生成性使用的影响。此外,政治层面反映了治理的宏观社会后果,以及与确保因广泛采用chatgpt类型技术而面临过时风险的职业的社会保护相关的法律组成部分。总的来说,我们的研究强调了具体的学术紧张关系,通过这种紧张关系,基于人工智能的生成技术在教育和组织部门得到了主要的鼓励,但与版权侵权和失业相关的潜在风险可能构成社会变革的重要驱动因素。我们还注意到,福柯式的权力/知识框架将有助于理解生成式人工智能在社会/宏观层面上未被充分讨论的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can't look away – The effects of social media cues signaling social evaluation on the attention allocation of socially anxious individuals The relationship between social support and social negativity on social media for virtual socializing and college students’ anxiety levels during the COVID-19 pandemic Reduce your social media use and be mindful for a better mental health: An experimental intervention study from Germany Reading between the lines: LLMs match or exceed human empathic accuracy using text alone Troubled water: Enhancing flood preparedness with eXtended reality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1