Public sentiment and engagement on cybersecurity: Insights from Reddit discussions

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in human behavior reports Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100573
Krishnashree Achuthan , Sugandh Khobragade , Robin Kowalski
{"title":"Public sentiment and engagement on cybersecurity: Insights from Reddit discussions","authors":"Krishnashree Achuthan ,&nbsp;Sugandh Khobragade ,&nbsp;Robin Kowalski","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cyber insecurity is recognized amongst the top severe global risks by the World Economic Forum.This study addresses a significant gap in our understanding of the social dynamics of public perception and online discourse related to cybersecurity, with a particular focus on how social media platforms shape and reflect public engagement. We employ sentiment analysis, topic modeling, and zero-shot text classification to analyze 33,893 news and user posts, along with the corresponding 194,591 news and user comments, across five subreddit discussion forums between 2012 and 2022. Through the lens of the Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF) and Protection Motivation Theory (PMT), we uncover patterns in topic engagement, emotional responses, community support, and the interplay of sentiment and comment types. Our findings reveal a complex landscape of public engagement with cybersecurity news, characterized by high interest in government surveillance, cyber warfare, and software vulnerabilities. Comments vary across topics, with technical advice dominating discussions, while skepticism and concern are prevalent in privacy-related areas. Community reactions tend towards critical engagement, with comments expressing concern, disappointment, and anger receiving high upvotes. Post sentiment weakly correlates with comment types, where more negative posts elicit increased expressions of concern, anger, and skepticism. The community's dynamic engagement with cybersecurity issues underscores the need for tailored communication strategies that acknowledge both emotional responses and the desire for practical solutions. This study contributes to an understanding of public engagement with cybersecurity issues on social media while offering insights for stakeholders seeking to foster informed, resilient, and engaged online communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100573"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824002069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cyber insecurity is recognized amongst the top severe global risks by the World Economic Forum.This study addresses a significant gap in our understanding of the social dynamics of public perception and online discourse related to cybersecurity, with a particular focus on how social media platforms shape and reflect public engagement. We employ sentiment analysis, topic modeling, and zero-shot text classification to analyze 33,893 news and user posts, along with the corresponding 194,591 news and user comments, across five subreddit discussion forums between 2012 and 2022. Through the lens of the Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF) and Protection Motivation Theory (PMT), we uncover patterns in topic engagement, emotional responses, community support, and the interplay of sentiment and comment types. Our findings reveal a complex landscape of public engagement with cybersecurity news, characterized by high interest in government surveillance, cyber warfare, and software vulnerabilities. Comments vary across topics, with technical advice dominating discussions, while skepticism and concern are prevalent in privacy-related areas. Community reactions tend towards critical engagement, with comments expressing concern, disappointment, and anger receiving high upvotes. Post sentiment weakly correlates with comment types, where more negative posts elicit increased expressions of concern, anger, and skepticism. The community's dynamic engagement with cybersecurity issues underscores the need for tailored communication strategies that acknowledge both emotional responses and the desire for practical solutions. This study contributes to an understanding of public engagement with cybersecurity issues on social media while offering insights for stakeholders seeking to foster informed, resilient, and engaged online communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toward the Language MOOC (LMOOC’s) low dropout rate: The control-value theory of persistency in LMOOC (CVTPLMOOC) Inclusive digital platforms: Designing for and with users with mild intellectual disabilities or low literacy skills Master your practice! A quantitative analysis of Device and system handling training to enable competent interactions with intelligent voice assistants Response-efficacy messages produce stronger passwords than self-efficacy messages … for now: A longitudinal experimental study of the efficacy of coping message types on password creation behaviour Systematic literature review on usability and training outcomes of using digital training technologies in industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1