Public sentiment and engagement on cybersecurity: Insights from Reddit discussions

IF 5.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in human behavior reports Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100573
Krishnashree Achuthan , Sugandh Khobragade , Robin Kowalski
{"title":"Public sentiment and engagement on cybersecurity: Insights from Reddit discussions","authors":"Krishnashree Achuthan ,&nbsp;Sugandh Khobragade ,&nbsp;Robin Kowalski","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cyber insecurity is recognized amongst the top severe global risks by the World Economic Forum.This study addresses a significant gap in our understanding of the social dynamics of public perception and online discourse related to cybersecurity, with a particular focus on how social media platforms shape and reflect public engagement. We employ sentiment analysis, topic modeling, and zero-shot text classification to analyze 33,893 news and user posts, along with the corresponding 194,591 news and user comments, across five subreddit discussion forums between 2012 and 2022. Through the lens of the Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF) and Protection Motivation Theory (PMT), we uncover patterns in topic engagement, emotional responses, community support, and the interplay of sentiment and comment types. Our findings reveal a complex landscape of public engagement with cybersecurity news, characterized by high interest in government surveillance, cyber warfare, and software vulnerabilities. Comments vary across topics, with technical advice dominating discussions, while skepticism and concern are prevalent in privacy-related areas. Community reactions tend towards critical engagement, with comments expressing concern, disappointment, and anger receiving high upvotes. Post sentiment weakly correlates with comment types, where more negative posts elicit increased expressions of concern, anger, and skepticism. The community's dynamic engagement with cybersecurity issues underscores the need for tailored communication strategies that acknowledge both emotional responses and the desire for practical solutions. This study contributes to an understanding of public engagement with cybersecurity issues on social media while offering insights for stakeholders seeking to foster informed, resilient, and engaged online communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100573"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824002069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cyber insecurity is recognized amongst the top severe global risks by the World Economic Forum.This study addresses a significant gap in our understanding of the social dynamics of public perception and online discourse related to cybersecurity, with a particular focus on how social media platforms shape and reflect public engagement. We employ sentiment analysis, topic modeling, and zero-shot text classification to analyze 33,893 news and user posts, along with the corresponding 194,591 news and user comments, across five subreddit discussion forums between 2012 and 2022. Through the lens of the Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF) and Protection Motivation Theory (PMT), we uncover patterns in topic engagement, emotional responses, community support, and the interplay of sentiment and comment types. Our findings reveal a complex landscape of public engagement with cybersecurity news, characterized by high interest in government surveillance, cyber warfare, and software vulnerabilities. Comments vary across topics, with technical advice dominating discussions, while skepticism and concern are prevalent in privacy-related areas. Community reactions tend towards critical engagement, with comments expressing concern, disappointment, and anger receiving high upvotes. Post sentiment weakly correlates with comment types, where more negative posts elicit increased expressions of concern, anger, and skepticism. The community's dynamic engagement with cybersecurity issues underscores the need for tailored communication strategies that acknowledge both emotional responses and the desire for practical solutions. This study contributes to an understanding of public engagement with cybersecurity issues on social media while offering insights for stakeholders seeking to foster informed, resilient, and engaged online communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公众对网络安全的情绪和参与:来自Reddit讨论的见解
网络安全被世界经济论坛认定为全球最严重的风险之一。本研究解决了我们对与网络安全相关的公众认知和在线话语的社会动态的理解上的一个重大差距,特别关注社交媒体平台如何塑造和反映公众参与。我们使用情感分析、主题建模和零shot文本分类来分析2012年至2022年间reddit五个子论坛上的33,893条新闻和用户帖子,以及相应的194,591条新闻和用户评论。通过社会风险放大框架(SARF)和保护动机理论(PMT)的视角,我们揭示了话题参与、情绪反应、社区支持以及情绪和评论类型相互作用的模式。我们的研究结果揭示了公众参与网络安全新闻的复杂格局,其特点是对政府监控、网络战和软件漏洞的高度兴趣。不同主题的评论各不相同,技术建议主导了讨论,而在与隐私相关的领域,怀疑和担忧普遍存在。社区反应倾向于批判性参与,表达担忧、失望和愤怒的评论获得了很高的支持。帖子情绪与评论类型的相关性较弱,更多的负面帖子会引起更多的关注、愤怒和怀疑。社区对网络安全问题的动态参与强调了定制沟通策略的必要性,这种沟通策略既要承认情绪反应,也要承认对实际解决方案的渴望。本研究有助于理解公众在社交媒体上参与网络安全问题,同时为寻求促进知情、有弹性和参与的在线社区的利益相关者提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can't look away – The effects of social media cues signaling social evaluation on the attention allocation of socially anxious individuals The relationship between social support and social negativity on social media for virtual socializing and college students’ anxiety levels during the COVID-19 pandemic Reduce your social media use and be mindful for a better mental health: An experimental intervention study from Germany Reading between the lines: LLMs match or exceed human empathic accuracy using text alone Troubled water: Enhancing flood preparedness with eXtended reality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1