Weaving traditions based on activity patterns in a pre-Columbian Diaguita community (AD 900 – 1536) of the semi-arid region of Chile

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104967
Rodrigo Retamal , Paola González , Aryel Pacheco
{"title":"Weaving traditions based on activity patterns in a pre-Columbian Diaguita community (AD 900 – 1536) of the semi-arid region of Chile","authors":"Rodrigo Retamal ,&nbsp;Paola González ,&nbsp;Aryel Pacheco","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to analyze patterns of entheseal changes to infer activity patterns in a sample (n = 112) of adult individuals from the El Olivar cemetery, Coquimbo Region, Chile.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The degree of muscular development was evaluated at 32 entheses for both the right and left sides of the appendicular skeleton. In cases where entheses were absent, univariate imputations were performed using ordinal logistic regressions. The entheses were grouped according to their primary movements. Muscle groups were standardized and analyzed independently by sex to control for sexual dimorphism. Age-related effects were addressed using ordinary regression models, and individuals with spondyloarthropathies (n = 10) were removed from the sample. Factor analysis was conducted for both non-imputed and imputed variables, and the results were compared and interpreted to infer movements and activity patterns among the analyzed individuals. Inferred activities were compared with available archaeological and ethnographic data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Males exhibited greater robustness in certain movements and on the right side, while females displayed lower robustness with no side differences. Distinct movement distributions along the first and second factors were observed between the sexes. Females concentrated thigh and upper limb movements as primary contributions to the first factor, whereas leg and foot movements contributed significantly to the second factor. Males showed a more scattered distribution of movements, with most upper limb movements primarily located on the right side of the plot, indicating a substantial contribution to the first factor. The right and left upper limbs among males demonstrated different movement distributions.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>After controlling for confounding factors, movements displayed an unequal distribution between males and females, suggesting that other factors may be related, such as the performance of different activities associated with workload and daily tasks. The concentration of upper limb and thigh movements in higher values of the first factor among females indicates activities primarily involving these body parts, while the lower limb remained fixed, as in kneeling or squatting positions. The second factor suggests activities like walking or running, which primarily engage the lower limb, with less involvement of the upper limb. Male movements appear to exhibit greater variability compared to female movements. Factor analyses indicate that shoulder movements and elbow flexion suggest engagement in activities requiring a wide range of upper limb movements. Furthermore, side associations imply that males engaged in certain activities that preferentially utilized one upper limb over the other. Grave goods from this site suggest deliberate ritual practices that intertwined the identities of certain individuals with specific activities, such as textile production among females and hunting/combat-related artifacts among males. Additional skeletal evidence, such as a higher prevalence of auditory exostoses among males, further supports the notion of a sexual division of labor. Ethnoarchaeological evidence also reinforces the association of textile production with female individuals. This research emphasizes the importance of defining and studying sex and gender to understand patterns of activity and social dynamics in the past. Integrating bioarchaeological data with archaeological and ethnoarchaeological evidence sheds light on gendered divisions of labor and associated inequalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 104967"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24005959","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to analyze patterns of entheseal changes to infer activity patterns in a sample (n = 112) of adult individuals from the El Olivar cemetery, Coquimbo Region, Chile.

Methods

The degree of muscular development was evaluated at 32 entheses for both the right and left sides of the appendicular skeleton. In cases where entheses were absent, univariate imputations were performed using ordinal logistic regressions. The entheses were grouped according to their primary movements. Muscle groups were standardized and analyzed independently by sex to control for sexual dimorphism. Age-related effects were addressed using ordinary regression models, and individuals with spondyloarthropathies (n = 10) were removed from the sample. Factor analysis was conducted for both non-imputed and imputed variables, and the results were compared and interpreted to infer movements and activity patterns among the analyzed individuals. Inferred activities were compared with available archaeological and ethnographic data.

Results

Males exhibited greater robustness in certain movements and on the right side, while females displayed lower robustness with no side differences. Distinct movement distributions along the first and second factors were observed between the sexes. Females concentrated thigh and upper limb movements as primary contributions to the first factor, whereas leg and foot movements contributed significantly to the second factor. Males showed a more scattered distribution of movements, with most upper limb movements primarily located on the right side of the plot, indicating a substantial contribution to the first factor. The right and left upper limbs among males demonstrated different movement distributions.

Discussion

After controlling for confounding factors, movements displayed an unequal distribution between males and females, suggesting that other factors may be related, such as the performance of different activities associated with workload and daily tasks. The concentration of upper limb and thigh movements in higher values of the first factor among females indicates activities primarily involving these body parts, while the lower limb remained fixed, as in kneeling or squatting positions. The second factor suggests activities like walking or running, which primarily engage the lower limb, with less involvement of the upper limb. Male movements appear to exhibit greater variability compared to female movements. Factor analyses indicate that shoulder movements and elbow flexion suggest engagement in activities requiring a wide range of upper limb movements. Furthermore, side associations imply that males engaged in certain activities that preferentially utilized one upper limb over the other. Grave goods from this site suggest deliberate ritual practices that intertwined the identities of certain individuals with specific activities, such as textile production among females and hunting/combat-related artifacts among males. Additional skeletal evidence, such as a higher prevalence of auditory exostoses among males, further supports the notion of a sexual division of labor. Ethnoarchaeological evidence also reinforces the association of textile production with female individuals. This research emphasizes the importance of defining and studying sex and gender to understand patterns of activity and social dynamics in the past. Integrating bioarchaeological data with archaeological and ethnoarchaeological evidence sheds light on gendered divisions of labor and associated inequalities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
期刊最新文献
Neither wheat, nor barley: An appraisal of the functional variability of the grinding and pounding stones from Hasankeyf Höyük, a Neolithic hunter-fisher-gatherer site on the upper Tigris Urban vs rural lifestyle in Roman Italy: a bioarchaeological and paleopathological investigation Early Neolithic grinding practices in central Europe: A case study from the LBK micro-region in southwestern Poland Woodlands, tree management, and fuel economy in Bronze Age eastern Crete: An anthracological approach Broken pots, unbroken habits? Traces of a special use activity related to pedestalled vessels in Starčevo and post-Starčevo communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1