Malvina Baumann , Evgeny Girya , Laurent Crépin , Marie-Anne Julien , William Rendu , Bahtivor Saifullaev , Andrei Krivoshapkin
{"title":"Middle Paleolithic bone industry in Central Asia, first evidence from Obi-Rakhmat Grotto (Uzbekistan)","authors":"Malvina Baumann , Evgeny Girya , Laurent Crépin , Marie-Anne Julien , William Rendu , Bahtivor Saifullaev , Andrei Krivoshapkin","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of bone tools in contexts predating the Upper Paleolithic of <em>Homo sapiens</em> in Eurasia is no longer subject to debate. However, the recent evidence highlighting significant Neanderthal bone industries demonstrates that this phenomenon has been largely underestimated. A re-evaluation of each assemblage through a systematic search for bone artifacts is now a necessary prerequisite for accurately assessing the nature and variability of bone production over time and across past humanities. Such an approach should precede any attempt at a broader understanding of the mechanisms underlying their emergence and development. With this in mind, we initiated an investigation in Central Asia, a key region for Middle Paleolithic human settlements, where the potential for bone artifacts has remained weakly tested until now. Here, we present the preliminary results from Obi-Rakhmat (Uzbekistan). Dated to 90–40 ka BP, it is one of the few multilayered sites in the region to have yielded human remains. The original composition of the set of bone artifacts, which reflects that of the lithic assemblage, confirms our expectations and opens new avenues for research on this emerging topic.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 104961"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24005893","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The use of bone tools in contexts predating the Upper Paleolithic of Homo sapiens in Eurasia is no longer subject to debate. However, the recent evidence highlighting significant Neanderthal bone industries demonstrates that this phenomenon has been largely underestimated. A re-evaluation of each assemblage through a systematic search for bone artifacts is now a necessary prerequisite for accurately assessing the nature and variability of bone production over time and across past humanities. Such an approach should precede any attempt at a broader understanding of the mechanisms underlying their emergence and development. With this in mind, we initiated an investigation in Central Asia, a key region for Middle Paleolithic human settlements, where the potential for bone artifacts has remained weakly tested until now. Here, we present the preliminary results from Obi-Rakhmat (Uzbekistan). Dated to 90–40 ka BP, it is one of the few multilayered sites in the region to have yielded human remains. The original composition of the set of bone artifacts, which reflects that of the lithic assemblage, confirms our expectations and opens new avenues for research on this emerging topic.
在欧亚大陆智人旧石器时代晚期之前的环境中,骨工具的使用已经不再是争论的话题。然而,最近的证据突出了重要的尼安德特人骨骼产业,表明这一现象在很大程度上被低估了。现在,通过对骨制品的系统搜索对每个组合进行重新评估是准确评估骨生产随时间和过去人类的性质和可变性的必要先决条件。在采取这种办法之前,应首先尝试更广泛地了解其产生和发展的机制。考虑到这一点,我们在中亚开始了一项调查,这是旧石器时代中期人类定居点的一个关键地区,在那里,骨制品的潜力直到现在还没有得到充分的测试。在这里,我们介绍了Obi-Rakhmat(乌兹别克斯坦)的初步结果。它可以追溯到90-40 ka BP,是该地区为数不多的发现人类遗骸的多层遗址之一。这组骨制品的原始成分反映了石器组合的成分,证实了我们的期望,并为这一新兴主题的研究开辟了新的途径。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.