Factors associated with good death for end-of-life patients in the intensive care unit based on nurses’ perspectives: A systematic review

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103930
Ifa Hafifah , Wasinee Wisesrith , Noraluk Ua-Kit
{"title":"Factors associated with good death for end-of-life patients in the intensive care unit based on nurses’ perspectives: A systematic review","authors":"Ifa Hafifah ,&nbsp;Wasinee Wisesrith ,&nbsp;Noraluk Ua-Kit","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ensuring a good death in the intensive care unit (ICU) is crucial due to high global mortality rates. Despite the central role of nurses in end-of-life care, existing reviews often focus on patients or families and overlook nurses’ perspectives.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aims to investigate the factors associated with a good death for end-of-life patients in the ICU based on nurses’ perspectives by systematically summarizing current evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The researchers utilized a systematic review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO. Databases searched included Scopus, ProQuest, PubMed, ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria covered English-language quantitative studies published from the inception until February 20, 2024, that reported factors influencing a good death from the perspective of ICU nurses, and were available in full text. The exclusion criteria included studies with mixed participants if separate analyses for nurses were not provided. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies, and a narrative synthesis was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five high-quality studies were included, involving 1,654 ICU nurses with an average age between 28.64 and 41.40 years, predominantly female (54.8 % to 91 %). Identified factors included nurses’ personal factors, nurses’ job characteristics, nurses’ clinical competence in end-of-life care, and process of healthcare.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The review highlights the vital factor influencing a good death from ICU nurses’ perspectives. Awareness of personal and job-related factors, along with enhanced clinical competence in end-of-life care, are essential for supporting patients to achieve a good death.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for Clinical Practice</h3><div>ICU nurses can enhance their clinical competence in end-of-life care. Hospital managers should take into account nurses’ work experience when assigning staff and consider implementing fixed shifts. Future research should explore these factors globally and develop interventions to support a good death in the ICU.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 103930"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724003161","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Ensuring a good death in the intensive care unit (ICU) is crucial due to high global mortality rates. Despite the central role of nurses in end-of-life care, existing reviews often focus on patients or families and overlook nurses’ perspectives.

Objectives

This study aims to investigate the factors associated with a good death for end-of-life patients in the ICU based on nurses’ perspectives by systematically summarizing current evidence.

Methods

The researchers utilized a systematic review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO. Databases searched included Scopus, ProQuest, PubMed, ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria covered English-language quantitative studies published from the inception until February 20, 2024, that reported factors influencing a good death from the perspective of ICU nurses, and were available in full text. The exclusion criteria included studies with mixed participants if separate analyses for nurses were not provided. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies, and a narrative synthesis was performed.

Results

Five high-quality studies were included, involving 1,654 ICU nurses with an average age between 28.64 and 41.40 years, predominantly female (54.8 % to 91 %). Identified factors included nurses’ personal factors, nurses’ job characteristics, nurses’ clinical competence in end-of-life care, and process of healthcare.

Conclusions

The review highlights the vital factor influencing a good death from ICU nurses’ perspectives. Awareness of personal and job-related factors, along with enhanced clinical competence in end-of-life care, are essential for supporting patients to achieve a good death.

Implications for Clinical Practice

ICU nurses can enhance their clinical competence in end-of-life care. Hospital managers should take into account nurses’ work experience when assigning staff and consider implementing fixed shifts. Future research should explore these factors globally and develop interventions to support a good death in the ICU.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于护士观点的重症监护病房临终病人良好死亡相关因素:系统回顾
背景:由于全球高死亡率,在重症监护病房(ICU)确保良好死亡至关重要。尽管护士在临终关怀中发挥着核心作用,但现有的评论往往侧重于患者或家属,而忽视了护士的观点。目的本研究旨在通过系统总结现有证据,从护士的角度探讨ICU临终患者良好死亡的相关因素。方法研究人员采用系统评价,遵循PRISMA 2020指南,并在PROSPERO注册。检索的数据库包括Scopus、ProQuest、PubMed、ScienceDirect、EBSCOhost和b谷歌Scholar。纳入标准涵盖从开始到2024年2月20日发表的从ICU护士角度报告影响良好死亡因素的英语定量研究,并可获得全文。排除标准包括混合参与者的研究,如果没有提供护士的单独分析。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)批判性评估清单进行分析性横断面研究的偏倚风险评估,并进行叙事综合。结果纳入5项高质量研究,共纳入1,654名ICU护士,平均年龄28.64 ~ 41.40 岁,以女性为主(54.8% % ~ 91% %)。确定的因素包括护士个人因素、护士工作特征、护士临终关怀临床能力和护理过程。结论从ICU护士的角度分析了影响患者良好死亡的重要因素。对个人和工作相关因素的认识,以及提高临终关怀的临床能力,对于支持患者实现良好的死亡至关重要。对临床实践的启示icu护士可以提高其临终关怀的临床能力。医院管理者在分配人员时应考虑护士的工作经验,并考虑实行固定班次。未来的研究应在全球范围内探索这些因素,并制定干预措施,以支持ICU的良好死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
期刊最新文献
Interlinked ecosystems: the challenges and opportunities of infection in ICUs and long-term care facilities From cost to investment: Why ICU nurse staffing metrics must be weighted for nursing workload Facilitators and barriers to optimizing sedation practices in critically ill adult patients: A qualitative study Reimagining the ICU E-Diary: Integration, Intelligence, and Impact – Response to Luo et al. Determinants and trajectories of functional recovery in ICU survivors: a multidimensional perspective – Letter on Mesina et al.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1