Xue Zhang , Shuzhen Liu , Xu Yan , Bin Nie , Shiyong Li , Xing Li , Ailin Luo , Yilin zhao
{"title":"Optic nerve subarachnoid space measurement as the best predictor of post-dural puncture headache after intravertebral anesthesia","authors":"Xue Zhang , Shuzhen Liu , Xu Yan , Bin Nie , Shiyong Li , Xing Li , Ailin Luo , Yilin zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2024.111557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intravertebral anesthesia is a commonly used method during surgery due to its easy administration, rapid effects, muscle relaxation, and pain control. However, post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a frequent complication following intravertebral anesthesia. The primary mechanism of PDPH is the leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through the dural puncture site, leading to a decrease in intracranial pressure (ICP). Symptoms typically include a headache that worsens when sitting or standing and improves when lying down, along with possible neck stiffness, nausea, and photophobia. The optic nerve subarachnoid space (ONSS), located behind the globe of the eye within the orbit, is filled with CSF and is continuous with the cranial subarachnoid space. The pressure in this space, often referred to as intraocular pressure (IOP) when discussing eye-related conditions, is typically discussed in the context of its relation to ICP when considering the optic nerve subarachnoid space. Therefore, the measurement of pressure in the ONSS by optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) may serve as the best predictor for PDPH, which might be an effective way to reflect changes in intracranial pressure after intravertebral anesthesia, offering valuable information for accurate prediction and prevention of PDPH.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 111557"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987724003001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Intravertebral anesthesia is a commonly used method during surgery due to its easy administration, rapid effects, muscle relaxation, and pain control. However, post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a frequent complication following intravertebral anesthesia. The primary mechanism of PDPH is the leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through the dural puncture site, leading to a decrease in intracranial pressure (ICP). Symptoms typically include a headache that worsens when sitting or standing and improves when lying down, along with possible neck stiffness, nausea, and photophobia. The optic nerve subarachnoid space (ONSS), located behind the globe of the eye within the orbit, is filled with CSF and is continuous with the cranial subarachnoid space. The pressure in this space, often referred to as intraocular pressure (IOP) when discussing eye-related conditions, is typically discussed in the context of its relation to ICP when considering the optic nerve subarachnoid space. Therefore, the measurement of pressure in the ONSS by optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) may serve as the best predictor for PDPH, which might be an effective way to reflect changes in intracranial pressure after intravertebral anesthesia, offering valuable information for accurate prediction and prevention of PDPH.
期刊介绍:
Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.