{"title":"Engineered probiotics that produce antibiotic binding sites: A potential strategy to protect gut microbiome and prevent antibiotic resistance","authors":"Mobina Saleh , Ruhollah Heydari , Mohammad Reza Ghanbari Boroujeni , Ramin Abiri","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2024.111558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Antibiotics play a pivotal role in combating infectious diseases globally, but their widespread use damages the gut microbiome, resulting in various diseases and the emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Reducing gut exposure to antibiotics during treatments is crucial for maintaining gut homeostasis. We suggest using edible engineered probiotics that express genes encoding antibiotic-binding peptides as a novel method to neutralize antibiotics and protect the gut flora. To produce these genetically modified organisms, CRISPR-Cas or other genome editing methods can be utilized. By inserting the gene encoding antibiotic-binding peptides along with the secretion complex into the probiotic, these engineered probiotics produce and secrete these peptides. The peptides that mimic natural antibiotic-binding sites specifically bind to and neutralize the intestinal drug residues (the administered antibiotics for infections outside the gut) and preserve the gut microbiome. Since the probiotics colonize and secrete these peptides in the distal intestine, antibiotic absorption in the proximal intestine remains unaffected. Using these engineered probiotics may reduce the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and prevent pathogen colonization. Further research in this area could advance the development of this promising approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 111558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987724003013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Antibiotics play a pivotal role in combating infectious diseases globally, but their widespread use damages the gut microbiome, resulting in various diseases and the emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Reducing gut exposure to antibiotics during treatments is crucial for maintaining gut homeostasis. We suggest using edible engineered probiotics that express genes encoding antibiotic-binding peptides as a novel method to neutralize antibiotics and protect the gut flora. To produce these genetically modified organisms, CRISPR-Cas or other genome editing methods can be utilized. By inserting the gene encoding antibiotic-binding peptides along with the secretion complex into the probiotic, these engineered probiotics produce and secrete these peptides. The peptides that mimic natural antibiotic-binding sites specifically bind to and neutralize the intestinal drug residues (the administered antibiotics for infections outside the gut) and preserve the gut microbiome. Since the probiotics colonize and secrete these peptides in the distal intestine, antibiotic absorption in the proximal intestine remains unaffected. Using these engineered probiotics may reduce the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and prevent pathogen colonization. Further research in this area could advance the development of this promising approach.
期刊介绍:
Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.