Shuchen Wang , Zhenlin Jia , Desheng Xue , Baotian Pan
{"title":"A correction method between sample mass and EPR intensity in radiation dose reconstruction","authors":"Shuchen Wang , Zhenlin Jia , Desheng Xue , Baotian Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) radiation dose reconstruction, maintaining a consistent mass across a series of aliquots is crucial. However, due to sample limitations or experimental uncertainties, achieving this consistency may not always be possible. To address these challenges and optimize experimental processes, a theoretical model (<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mo>−</mo><mi>M</mi></mrow></math></span> model) was developed to describe the relationship between EPR intensity emanating from a TE<sub>011</sub> mode cylindrical resonant cavity and sample mass. The model was verified using the TEMPO paramagnetic standard and quartz, a common material employed in dosimetry reconstructions. Based on this model and the evaluation of the modulation magnetic field uniformity, correction methods for EPR intensity in solid powder samples were proposed. The model reveals that the non-uniformity of the microwave magnetic field distribution in the resonant cavity leads to spatial inconsistency in sample responses, resulting in a non-linear relationship between EPR intensity and sample mass, characterized by a “sinusoidal + linear” pattern. The parameter <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>I</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>cen.</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> is recommended as a metric for EPR intensity, as it intrinsically characterizes the spin concentration of the sample regardless of sample mass, thereby enhancing the accuracy of quantitative EPR measurements and equivalent dose evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21055,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Measurements","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 107364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Measurements","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448724003123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) radiation dose reconstruction, maintaining a consistent mass across a series of aliquots is crucial. However, due to sample limitations or experimental uncertainties, achieving this consistency may not always be possible. To address these challenges and optimize experimental processes, a theoretical model ( model) was developed to describe the relationship between EPR intensity emanating from a TE011 mode cylindrical resonant cavity and sample mass. The model was verified using the TEMPO paramagnetic standard and quartz, a common material employed in dosimetry reconstructions. Based on this model and the evaluation of the modulation magnetic field uniformity, correction methods for EPR intensity in solid powder samples were proposed. The model reveals that the non-uniformity of the microwave magnetic field distribution in the resonant cavity leads to spatial inconsistency in sample responses, resulting in a non-linear relationship between EPR intensity and sample mass, characterized by a “sinusoidal + linear” pattern. The parameter is recommended as a metric for EPR intensity, as it intrinsically characterizes the spin concentration of the sample regardless of sample mass, thereby enhancing the accuracy of quantitative EPR measurements and equivalent dose evaluation.
期刊介绍:
The journal seeks to publish papers that present advances in the following areas: spontaneous and stimulated luminescence (including scintillating materials, thermoluminescence, and optically stimulated luminescence); electron spin resonance of natural and synthetic materials; the physics, design and performance of radiation measurements (including computational modelling such as electronic transport simulations); the novel basic aspects of radiation measurement in medical physics. Studies of energy-transfer phenomena, track physics and microdosimetry are also of interest to the journal.
Applications relevant to the journal, particularly where they present novel detection techniques, novel analytical approaches or novel materials, include: personal dosimetry (including dosimetric quantities, active/electronic and passive monitoring techniques for photon, neutron and charged-particle exposures); environmental dosimetry (including methodological advances and predictive models related to radon, but generally excluding local survey results of radon where the main aim is to establish the radiation risk to populations); cosmic and high-energy radiation measurements (including dosimetry, space radiation effects, and single event upsets); dosimetry-based archaeological and Quaternary dating; dosimetry-based approaches to thermochronometry; accident and retrospective dosimetry (including activation detectors), and dosimetry and measurements related to medical applications.