Forest management interventions affect the trade-offs of multiple vegetation and soil ecosystem services in walnut forests in the Taihang Mountains, China

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Global Ecology and Conservation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03420
Xin Li , Yanmei Chen , Qianyuan Liu , Yanan Liu
{"title":"Forest management interventions affect the trade-offs of multiple vegetation and soil ecosystem services in walnut forests in the Taihang Mountains, China","authors":"Xin Li ,&nbsp;Yanmei Chen ,&nbsp;Qianyuan Liu ,&nbsp;Yanan Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial forests provide various ecosystem services (ESs) and contribute to mitigating global climate change. However, the differences and trade-offs among ESs under different interventions remain unclear. This study investigated the variations in ESs and their trade-offs in artificial walnut forests in the Taihang Mountains under four human interventions: original shrub-grassland, long-term unmanaged walnut forests, walnut forests with clearing of shrubs and grasses, and walnut forests with clearing of shrubs and grasses and application of fertilizers. These interventions were established after a walnut plantation on shrub-grass-dominated slopes in 2003. Four ESs were evaluated using the entropy weight method: maintenance of plant diversity, carbon sequestration, soil and water conservation, and soil nutrient maintenance. Trade-offs among ESs were analyzed using the root mean square deviation (RMSD). Results showed that: (1) both the ESs composite value and the average trade-off value between ESs initially increased, then decreased, with increasing human intervention. The highest ESs composite value (ESs = 0.5655) and the lowest average trade-off value (RMSD = 0.149) were observed in walnut forests with clearing of shrubs and grasses. (2) Most paired ESs exhibited moderate or high trade-offs with each other, but differences existed between the walnut forests and the original shrub-grassland. The original shrub-grassland showed lower trade-offs between maintenance of plant diversity and carbon sequestration, and between maintenance of plant diversity and soil nutrient maintenance, while these trade-offs increased after the conversion to walnut forests. (3) Redundancy analysis and Pearson correlation analysis revealed that aboveground biomass explained 63.9 % of the variation in ESs indicators in the walnut forests, and soil phosphorus storage was significantly correlated with the trade-offs between most paired ESs, indicating significant influences of vegetation and soil factors on ESs indicators and trade-offs. Our findings suggest that shrub and grass removal is a key intervention affecting ecosystem trade-offs in artificial forests. Therefore, effective management of plantation vegetation is necessary to support the multifunctional balance of ESs and promote plantation ecosystem stability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article e03420"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425000216","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial forests provide various ecosystem services (ESs) and contribute to mitigating global climate change. However, the differences and trade-offs among ESs under different interventions remain unclear. This study investigated the variations in ESs and their trade-offs in artificial walnut forests in the Taihang Mountains under four human interventions: original shrub-grassland, long-term unmanaged walnut forests, walnut forests with clearing of shrubs and grasses, and walnut forests with clearing of shrubs and grasses and application of fertilizers. These interventions were established after a walnut plantation on shrub-grass-dominated slopes in 2003. Four ESs were evaluated using the entropy weight method: maintenance of plant diversity, carbon sequestration, soil and water conservation, and soil nutrient maintenance. Trade-offs among ESs were analyzed using the root mean square deviation (RMSD). Results showed that: (1) both the ESs composite value and the average trade-off value between ESs initially increased, then decreased, with increasing human intervention. The highest ESs composite value (ESs = 0.5655) and the lowest average trade-off value (RMSD = 0.149) were observed in walnut forests with clearing of shrubs and grasses. (2) Most paired ESs exhibited moderate or high trade-offs with each other, but differences existed between the walnut forests and the original shrub-grassland. The original shrub-grassland showed lower trade-offs between maintenance of plant diversity and carbon sequestration, and between maintenance of plant diversity and soil nutrient maintenance, while these trade-offs increased after the conversion to walnut forests. (3) Redundancy analysis and Pearson correlation analysis revealed that aboveground biomass explained 63.9 % of the variation in ESs indicators in the walnut forests, and soil phosphorus storage was significantly correlated with the trade-offs between most paired ESs, indicating significant influences of vegetation and soil factors on ESs indicators and trade-offs. Our findings suggest that shrub and grass removal is a key intervention affecting ecosystem trade-offs in artificial forests. Therefore, effective management of plantation vegetation is necessary to support the multifunctional balance of ESs and promote plantation ecosystem stability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
森林管理干预影响太行山核桃林多种植被和土壤生态系统服务的权衡
人工森林提供各种生态系统服务,有助于减缓全球气候变化。然而,不同干预措施下ESs之间的差异和权衡仍不清楚。研究了太行山人工核桃林在原始灌丛草地、长期无管理核桃林、清灌木清草核桃林和清灌木清草加施肥核桃林四种人为干预措施下生态系统生态系统的变化及其权衡。这些干预措施是在2003年在灌木草为主的山坡上种植核桃后建立的。采用熵权法评价4种生态效益:维持植物多样性、固碳、水土保持和土壤养分维持。使用均方根偏差(RMSD)分析ESs之间的权衡。结果表明:(1)随着人为干预的增加,ESs综合值和ESs之间的平均权衡值均呈现先升高后降低的趋势。清除灌草后的核桃林生态系统的ESs综合值最高(ESs = 0.5655),平均权衡值最低(RMSD = 0.149)。(2)大多数对生态系统相互之间表现出中等或高度的权衡,但核桃林与原始灌丛草地之间存在差异。原始灌丛草地在维持植物多样性与固碳、维持植物多样性与维持土壤养分之间表现出较低的权衡,而在转化为核桃林后,这些权衡有所增加。(3)冗余分析和Pearson相关分析表明,地上生物量对核桃林生态环境指标变化的解释率为63.9 %,土壤磷储量与大多数配对生态环境指标之间的权衡存在显著相关,表明植被和土壤因素对生态环境指标和权衡有显著影响。我们的研究结果表明,去除灌木和草是影响人工森林生态系统权衡的关键干预措施。因此,对人工林植被进行有效管理是支持生态系统多功能平衡,促进人工林生态系统稳定的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
期刊最新文献
Mapping knowledge and conservation gaps in Atlantic nurse shark research: A global North-South perspective Climate shapes biodiversity–mycorrhiza interactions to control forest carbon DNA macrobarcoding reveals seasonal differences and spatial heterogeneity in the diet of Chinese Milu (Elaphurus davidianus) in China Multi-source captive breeding maintains nuclear genetic diversity in Alpine musk deer (Moschus chrysogaster) despite severe mitochondrial erosion What helps in the short term may hinder later: High grass abundance caused by the sowing of a competitive grass species limits meadow steppic grassland regeneration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1