Transformative governance: Exploring theory of change and the role of the law

IF 4.6 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.esg.2024.100230
Korhonen-Kurki K., D'Amato D., Belinskij A., Lazarevic D., Leskinen P., Nylén E.-J., Pappila M., Penttilä O., Pitzén S., Pykäläinen N., Turunen T., Vikström S.
{"title":"Transformative governance: Exploring theory of change and the role of the law","authors":"Korhonen-Kurki K.,&nbsp;D'Amato D.,&nbsp;Belinskij A.,&nbsp;Lazarevic D.,&nbsp;Leskinen P.,&nbsp;Nylén E.-J.,&nbsp;Pappila M.,&nbsp;Penttilä O.,&nbsp;Pitzén S.,&nbsp;Pykäläinen N.,&nbsp;Turunen T.,&nbsp;Vikström S.","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2024.100230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transformative change is becoming a key concept in the scientific conceptualization of sustainability. We assess five environmental governance approaches: adaptive, earth system, evolutionary, transformative and transition governance. We ask 1) What characterizes the different governance approaches, and how do they understand the dynamics of change? 2) How is the role of law conceptualized in the context of these governance approaches? The five studied approaches present different and complementary ways of describing change and how it unfolds or can be steered. According to our literature review, collaboration, leadership, learning, plurality, empowering, innovation and vision are seen as key mechanisms for change, while law is often oversimplified in these governance approaches, either as an enabler of or as a barrier to change towards sustainability. Future avenues of research could include how disruptive elements could be introduced as a way of catalyzing change and how to strengthen legal analysis to transformative change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100230"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811624000302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transformative change is becoming a key concept in the scientific conceptualization of sustainability. We assess five environmental governance approaches: adaptive, earth system, evolutionary, transformative and transition governance. We ask 1) What characterizes the different governance approaches, and how do they understand the dynamics of change? 2) How is the role of law conceptualized in the context of these governance approaches? The five studied approaches present different and complementary ways of describing change and how it unfolds or can be steered. According to our literature review, collaboration, leadership, learning, plurality, empowering, innovation and vision are seen as key mechanisms for change, while law is often oversimplified in these governance approaches, either as an enabler of or as a barrier to change towards sustainability. Future avenues of research could include how disruptive elements could be introduced as a way of catalyzing change and how to strengthen legal analysis to transformative change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
变革型治理:探索变革理论和法律的作用
变革性变化正在成为可持续发展科学概念中的一个关键概念。我们评估了五种环境治理方法:适应性治理、地球系统治理、进化治理、变革治理和过渡治理。我们的问题是:1)不同治理方法的特点是什么?它们如何理解变化的动态?2)在这些治理方法的背景下,法律的作用是如何概念化的?所研究的五种方法呈现了描述变化以及如何展开或如何引导变化的不同和互补的方式。根据我们的文献综述,协作、领导、学习、多元化、赋权、创新和愿景被视为变革的关键机制,而法律在这些治理方法中往往被过度简化,要么作为可持续性变革的推动者,要么作为可持续性变革的障碍。未来的研究途径可能包括如何引入破坏性因素作为促进变革的一种方式,以及如何加强对变革的法律分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
From 'Predict and Provide' towards 'Reduce Demand': institutionalising Wellbeing Economy discourse in Welsh transport policy Navigating just transitions: Trade union strategies and climate delay in North Sea energy politics Explaining Ethiopia’s engagement in multilateral climate transparency arrangements: Why engage and with what implications for domestic climate action? Framing analysis of Japan and China's response to Fukushima water discharge: Technical rationality vs local experience Corporate earth system accountability: Governance strategies to reduce microplastic pollution from consumer products
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1