From complexity to integration: Insights for process design from an empirical case study of transdisciplinary planetary health collaboration in Indonesia

IF 4.6 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1016/j.esg.2024.100233
Jane Wardani , Joannette J. (Annette) Bos , Diego Ramirez-Lovering , Anthony G. Capon
{"title":"From complexity to integration: Insights for process design from an empirical case study of transdisciplinary planetary health collaboration in Indonesia","authors":"Jane Wardani ,&nbsp;Joannette J. (Annette) Bos ,&nbsp;Diego Ramirez-Lovering ,&nbsp;Anthony G. Capon","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2024.100233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transdisciplinary research has been increasingly advocated as necessary to address complex planetary health challenges spanning environmental and human health in different socio-economic contexts. Recognising global interdependence, such research must engage in equitable co-production for lasting, meaningful impact. Existing transdisciplinarity frameworks and practices from the environment, health, and development fields primarily focus on research processes and outcomes, generically mentioning ‘collaboration’ without sufficiently expanding how the process can be designed to facilitate equitable and sustained outcomes. This case study undertakes an empirical deep-dive into a planetary health research in Indonesia to better understand transdisciplinary collaboration from participants' experiences. Deductive and inductive analyses of the enabling and constraining factors offer novel insights into the collaborative process of stakeholder engagement, interaction, and integration. Rich examples from the case study were then synthesised into process design strategies to overcome structural constraints through boundary spanning, adaptive project management, and creating spaces for social learning and reflexivity. (150 words).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100233"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811624000338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transdisciplinary research has been increasingly advocated as necessary to address complex planetary health challenges spanning environmental and human health in different socio-economic contexts. Recognising global interdependence, such research must engage in equitable co-production for lasting, meaningful impact. Existing transdisciplinarity frameworks and practices from the environment, health, and development fields primarily focus on research processes and outcomes, generically mentioning ‘collaboration’ without sufficiently expanding how the process can be designed to facilitate equitable and sustained outcomes. This case study undertakes an empirical deep-dive into a planetary health research in Indonesia to better understand transdisciplinary collaboration from participants' experiences. Deductive and inductive analyses of the enabling and constraining factors offer novel insights into the collaborative process of stakeholder engagement, interaction, and integration. Rich examples from the case study were then synthesised into process design strategies to overcome structural constraints through boundary spanning, adaptive project management, and creating spaces for social learning and reflexivity. (150 words).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从复杂到整合:来自印度尼西亚跨学科全球卫生合作经验案例研究的流程设计见解
越来越多的人主张进行跨学科研究,认为这是解决在不同社会经济背景下涉及环境和人类健康的复杂的地球健康挑战所必需的。认识到全球相互依存,这类研究必须参与公平的合作生产,以产生持久、有意义的影响。来自环境、卫生和发展领域的现有跨学科框架和做法主要侧重于研究过程和成果,笼统地提到“合作”,而没有充分扩展如何设计这一过程以促进公平和持续的成果。本案例研究对印度尼西亚的一项行星卫生研究进行了实证深入研究,以便从参与者的经验中更好地了解跨学科合作。对促成因素和制约因素的演绎和归纳分析为涉众参与、交互和集成的协作过程提供了新颖的见解。然后将案例研究中的丰富示例综合到流程设计策略中,通过边界跨越、适应性项目管理以及为社会学习和反思创造空间来克服结构约束。(150字)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unpacking adaptation lock-ins: Explaining the persistence of the adaptation gap SDGs and living wages: Can global goals steer private sector sustainability? Special drawing rights and ecological vulnerability: Monetary hierarchy and the translation of values Horizontal venue-shopping and non-governmental organizations’ influence on regional fisheries management organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1