First African validation study of HARMS2-AF and C2HEST scores to predict the onset of atrial fibrillation in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated by PCI: A report from the Moroccan data

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.acvd.2024.10.082
A. Bouchlarhem , N. Ismaili , N. El Ouafi
{"title":"First African validation study of HARMS2-AF and C2HEST scores to predict the onset of atrial fibrillation in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated by PCI: A report from the Moroccan data","authors":"A. Bouchlarhem ,&nbsp;N. Ismaili ,&nbsp;N. El Ouafi","doi":"10.1016/j.acvd.2024.10.082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) during acute coronary syndrome (ACS) represents a complex association given the high thrombo-embolic risk.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We analyzed the validity of the HARMS2-AF and C2HEST score in predicting NOAF in patients with ACS treated by PCI in an African population using data from a Moroccan population.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We examined the medical data of patients admitted to our CICU over a 4-year period. We excluded patients with AF prior to admission. Our primary outcome was an episode of NOAF in-hospital. Discrimination for NOAF was assessed using area under the receiver characteristic curve (AUC) values, and a comparison between the two scores was made using the De-long test. We also performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis to predict NOAF using the C2HEST score for a cut-off at 3 and the HARMS2-AF score for a cut-off at 7.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 763 patients, 76.3% men, with 75% of patients admitted for STEMI. NOAF was diagnosed in 8.4% with 93% within the first 48 h after admission. Patients with NOAF were older (70.27<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11.64 <em>vs.</em> 64.24<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11.55, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), with a longer length of hospital stay (5.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.86 <em>vs.</em> 3.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.05, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), a lower ejection fraction (40, 96<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12.25 <em>vs.</em> 46.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12.06, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), a higher C2HEST score (2.45<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.79 <em>vs.</em> 2.27<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.43, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.003), and a higher HARMS2-AF score (9.22<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.50 <em>vs.</em> 6.72<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.94, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, a C2HEST score<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->3 was independently associated with the occurrence of NOAF (odds ratio 3.54; 95% CI 2.07–6.07, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), as was a HARMS2-AF score<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->7 (odds ratio 5.56; 95% CI 2.91–10.61, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). ROC curve analysis showed good accuracy of the C2HEST score (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.665; 0.731; <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) and HARMS2-AF score (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.689; 0.754; <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) in predicting NOAF, with no significant difference between the two scores (De long test <em>p</em> value<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.326) (<span><span>Fig. 1</span></span>)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>As demonstrated by our results, HARMS2-AF and C2HEST scores can predict NOAF after ACS treated with PCI, which will allow selection of patients with a higher risk of stroke.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55472,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":"118 1","pages":"Pages S18-S19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875213624004273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) during acute coronary syndrome (ACS) represents a complex association given the high thrombo-embolic risk.

Objective

We analyzed the validity of the HARMS2-AF and C2HEST score in predicting NOAF in patients with ACS treated by PCI in an African population using data from a Moroccan population.

Method

We examined the medical data of patients admitted to our CICU over a 4-year period. We excluded patients with AF prior to admission. Our primary outcome was an episode of NOAF in-hospital. Discrimination for NOAF was assessed using area under the receiver characteristic curve (AUC) values, and a comparison between the two scores was made using the De-long test. We also performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis to predict NOAF using the C2HEST score for a cut-off at 3 and the HARMS2-AF score for a cut-off at 7.

Results

We included 763 patients, 76.3% men, with 75% of patients admitted for STEMI. NOAF was diagnosed in 8.4% with 93% within the first 48 h after admission. Patients with NOAF were older (70.27 ± 11.64 vs. 64.24 ± 11.55, p < 0.001), with a longer length of hospital stay (5.7 ± 3.86 vs. 3.8 ± 2.05, p < 0.001), a lower ejection fraction (40, 96 ± 12.25 vs. 46.6 ± 12.06, p < 0.001), a higher C2HEST score (2.45 ± 1.79 vs. 2.27 ± 1.43, p = 0.003), and a higher HARMS2-AF score (9.22 ± 3.50 vs. 6.72 ± 2.94, p < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, a C2HEST score > 3 was independently associated with the occurrence of NOAF (odds ratio 3.54; 95% CI 2.07–6.07, p < 0.001), as was a HARMS2-AF score > 7 (odds ratio 5.56; 95% CI 2.91–10.61, p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis showed good accuracy of the C2HEST score (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.665; 0.731; p < 0.001) and HARMS2-AF score (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.689; 0.754; p < 0.001) in predicting NOAF, with no significant difference between the two scores (De long test p value = 0.326) (Fig. 1)

Conclusion

As demonstrated by our results, HARMS2-AF and C2HEST scores can predict NOAF after ACS treated with PCI, which will allow selection of patients with a higher risk of stroke.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
87
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles and editorials. Topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Koch's triangle and coronary sinus anatomy assessed by three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping in paediatric patients with junctional tachycardia. Assessment of quitting versus using aspirin therapy in patients with stabilized coronary artery disease after stenting who require long-term oral anticoagulation: Rationale for and design of the AQUATIC double-blind randomized trial. Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes and increased platelet count. Beta-blockers after myocardial infarction: An evergreen therapy? What's new in the recent updated ESC guidelines on chronic coronary syndrome management?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1