Management of DES coronary restenosis in a real-life setting in North African centers

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.acvd.2024.10.078
F. Boukerche , M. Kerrouche
{"title":"Management of DES coronary restenosis in a real-life setting in North African centers","authors":"F. Boukerche ,&nbsp;M. Kerrouche","doi":"10.1016/j.acvd.2024.10.078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>One of the main causes of failure of angioplasty with stent implantation is in-stent restenosis (ISR). Even though its incidence has considerably decreased in recent years, it remains the Achilles’ heel of the interventional approach in patients with coronary disease.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aimed to determine the predisposing factors of the different types of restenosis and evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of the 2 most frequently used treatments of stent restenosis: drug-eluting balloon (DEB) and placement of a new drug-eluting stent (redo-DES).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A prospective longitudinal analytical bicentric study, including all consenting patients presenting on coronary angiography in-stent restenosis, whether in the context of the exploration of stable angina or acute coronary syndrome. The different characteristics, mechanisms (analysis of initial PCI procedure, stent enhancement, and IVUS) management, and prognosis were noted. An angiographic control was systematically carried out between 6 and 12 months in patients treated with a Redo-DES or DEB (<span><span>Fig. 1</span></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 73 patients were evaluated: the mean age was 61.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10.2 years and 80.8% were male. The more frequent risk factor was diabetes with 67.1% (47 patients), and the main clinical presentation was CCS in 56.2% (41patients). The mean delay of in-stent restenosis occurrence was 20 months (4–48 months). The related artery includes the LAD in 61.6% and the two main characteristics of the initial lesion were calcified in 68.5% and the longest (&gt;<!--> <!-->24 mm) in 53.4% of patients. Stent under expansion was the most found mechanism in 54.8%. More than a half of the patients were treated with Redo-stenting and 34.2% with a DEB. The angiographic control was good with only two significant redo-restenosis in patients treated with a DEB and three in patients treated with a DES.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Diabetes mellitus, calcified and long lesions are the most important factors related to in-stent restenosis. Stent under expansion was the most found mechanism. Redo-stenting and DEB are safe and efficient treatments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55472,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":"118 1","pages":"Pages S16-S17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875213624004236","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

One of the main causes of failure of angioplasty with stent implantation is in-stent restenosis (ISR). Even though its incidence has considerably decreased in recent years, it remains the Achilles’ heel of the interventional approach in patients with coronary disease.

Objective

We aimed to determine the predisposing factors of the different types of restenosis and evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of the 2 most frequently used treatments of stent restenosis: drug-eluting balloon (DEB) and placement of a new drug-eluting stent (redo-DES).

Method

A prospective longitudinal analytical bicentric study, including all consenting patients presenting on coronary angiography in-stent restenosis, whether in the context of the exploration of stable angina or acute coronary syndrome. The different characteristics, mechanisms (analysis of initial PCI procedure, stent enhancement, and IVUS) management, and prognosis were noted. An angiographic control was systematically carried out between 6 and 12 months in patients treated with a Redo-DES or DEB (Fig. 1).

Results

A total of 73 patients were evaluated: the mean age was 61.3 ± 10.2 years and 80.8% were male. The more frequent risk factor was diabetes with 67.1% (47 patients), and the main clinical presentation was CCS in 56.2% (41patients). The mean delay of in-stent restenosis occurrence was 20 months (4–48 months). The related artery includes the LAD in 61.6% and the two main characteristics of the initial lesion were calcified in 68.5% and the longest (> 24 mm) in 53.4% of patients. Stent under expansion was the most found mechanism in 54.8%. More than a half of the patients were treated with Redo-stenting and 34.2% with a DEB. The angiographic control was good with only two significant redo-restenosis in patients treated with a DEB and three in patients treated with a DES.

Conclusion

Diabetes mellitus, calcified and long lesions are the most important factors related to in-stent restenosis. Stent under expansion was the most found mechanism. Redo-stenting and DEB are safe and efficient treatments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在北非中心的现实生活设置DES冠状动脉再狭窄的管理
血管成形术合并支架植入术失败的主要原因之一是支架内再狭窄。尽管近年来其发病率已显著下降,但它仍然是冠状动脉疾病患者介入治疗的致命弱点。目的探讨药物洗脱球囊(DEB)和新型药物洗脱支架(redo-DES)两种最常用的支架再狭窄治疗方法的疗效和安全性。方法一项前瞻性纵向分析双中心研究,包括所有同意接受冠状动脉造影的支架内再狭窄患者,无论是在探索稳定型心绞痛还是急性冠状动脉综合征的背景下。不同的特点,机制(分析初始PCI手术,支架增强和IVUS)管理和预后。在接受Redo-DES或DEB治疗的患者6 - 12个月间系统地进行血管造影对照(图1)。结果共评估73例患者:平均年龄为61.3±10.2岁,80.8%为男性。最常见的危险因素为糖尿病(67.1%,47例),主要临床表现为CCS(56.2%, 41例)。支架内再狭窄发生的平均延迟时间为20个月(4 ~ 48个月)。相关动脉包括LAD(61.6%),初始病变的两个主要特征是钙化(68.5%)和最长(>;24 mm),占53.4%。支架扩张是最常见的机制,占54.8%。超过一半的患者接受了redo支架置入术,34.2%的患者接受了DEB。血管造影控制良好,DEB组仅有2例出现明显的再狭窄,des组有3例。结论糖尿病、钙化和长病变是支架内再狭窄的重要因素。支架扩张是发现最多的机制。重新支架置入术和DEB是安全有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
87
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles and editorials. Topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial board Transcatheter closure of ostium secundum atrial septal defects in 2253 children and adults: Early outcomes Clinical impact of congestion in patients admitted for cardiogenic shock Combination of a proximity catheterization laboratory and high-volume operators is associated with improved outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1