Balancing conflicting objectives in pre-salt reservoir development: A robust multi-objective optimization framework

Auref Rostamian, Amir Davari Malekabadi, Marx Vladimir De Souda Miranda, Vinicius Edurado Botechia, Denis José Schiozer
{"title":"Balancing conflicting objectives in pre-salt reservoir development: A robust multi-objective optimization framework","authors":"Auref Rostamian,&nbsp;Amir Davari Malekabadi,&nbsp;Marx Vladimir De Souda Miranda,&nbsp;Vinicius Edurado Botechia,&nbsp;Denis José Schiozer","doi":"10.1016/j.uncres.2024.100130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Optimizing production strategies for gas and oil fields is a critical challenge in petroleum engineering as it involves balancing multiple and often conflicting objectives, for instance, enhancing production rates, reducing operational costs, and mitigating the environmental effects of cumulative water or gas production. This study aims to develop and apply a robust multi-objective optimization framework to the UNISIM-II-D reservoir, which represents Brazilian pre-salt fields on nine representative models (RMs) to address geological uncertainties while considering three economic scenarios. The study focuses on maximizing expected monetary value (EMV) and the net present value of RM4 considering economic uncertainty (NPVeco of RM4), of the most pessimistic scenario among the RMs. The optimization variables are location, type (injection or production), and number of wells, while the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) is employed for multi-objective optimization. The study indicates that prioritizing EMV, the primary objective function, does not inevitably result in the NPVeco of RM4 achieving its optimal or near-optimal value. However, by employing the proposed framework, a 3 % improvement in EMV and a 28 % enhancement in the NPVeco of RM4 is achieved compared to the single objective optimization of EMV, which highlights the strength and robustness of the framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101263,"journal":{"name":"Unconventional Resources","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unconventional Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266651902400058X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimizing production strategies for gas and oil fields is a critical challenge in petroleum engineering as it involves balancing multiple and often conflicting objectives, for instance, enhancing production rates, reducing operational costs, and mitigating the environmental effects of cumulative water or gas production. This study aims to develop and apply a robust multi-objective optimization framework to the UNISIM-II-D reservoir, which represents Brazilian pre-salt fields on nine representative models (RMs) to address geological uncertainties while considering three economic scenarios. The study focuses on maximizing expected monetary value (EMV) and the net present value of RM4 considering economic uncertainty (NPVeco of RM4), of the most pessimistic scenario among the RMs. The optimization variables are location, type (injection or production), and number of wells, while the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) is employed for multi-objective optimization. The study indicates that prioritizing EMV, the primary objective function, does not inevitably result in the NPVeco of RM4 achieving its optimal or near-optimal value. However, by employing the proposed framework, a 3 % improvement in EMV and a 28 % enhancement in the NPVeco of RM4 is achieved compared to the single objective optimization of EMV, which highlights the strength and robustness of the framework.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mineralogy and geochemistry of shale from Shanxi Formation, Southern North China Basin: Implication for organic matter accumulation Optimization and potential assessment of CO2 geological storage caprock in the saline aquifers of the Qingjiang Basin, middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Exploring geothermal energy as a sustainable source of energy: A systemic review Offshore wind technology of India: Potential and perspectives Enhancing heat recovery efficiency in chimney exhaust systems using thermoelectric generators – Thermal modeling and parametric analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1